• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why the USA lost the Vietnam war.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WHY USA LOST THE VIETNAM WAR The Vietnam War or else known as the second Indochina war began in 1959 and lasted until April 30, 1975. It occurred in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia and fought between the North Vietnam (supported by communist allies) and the South Vietnam (supported by the United States and other member nations of the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO). It was fought to stop the spread of communism. The United States entered the war to prevent a communist takeover of South Vietnam as part of their wider strategy of containment. Military advisors arrived in 1950. U.S. involvement increased in the early 1960s deploy combat units were sent to Vietnam in 1965.The Americans decided to leave Vietnam in 1973. ...read more.

Middle

Not only that, but US soldiers' weapons were being supplied from 8,000 miles away and the Vietcong were being supplied by China and Russia which weren't so far away. Due to unfamiliarity to their way of fighting the US soldiers were unable to beat the Vietcong therefore becoming weak and heading for failure. Another reasons for the defeat was due to the lack of experience of the US soldiers, the treatment of the black soldiers - they were used as bait, and most of the soldiers took drugs, shot their officers and deserted whereas the Vietcong were very determined to drive the Americans out at whatever cost - they were motivated . The war became unpopular in US and lost public support because people didn't know why they should support it when it was 8,000 miles away. ...read more.

Conclusion

Whereas the Vietcong were very prepared (as they were at war so much), motivated and determined to fight. The Vietcong also fought a guerrilla war which was unfamiliar to the soldiers. The war resulted in 58,152 US deaths because of their weakness and the tactic the Vietcong used which was called 'hanging onto the belts'. This was when they stayed very close to the US troops so that when they attacked, the US could not defeat them without killing their own men. Overall, in my opinion I think that the US involvement was not completely necessary and because of that they were defeated. There were many reasons for why US lost and the one I consider as the main reason is the inexperience. Without the financial reasons, US might not have been able to leave Vietnam therefore resulting in more unnecessary deaths. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    I think that the source was produced to shows how not only people fighting in the Vietnam war were being affected but also people back in America were being affected. Also people did not like what they were seeing/ hearing via media and they wanted Americans troops to return.

  2. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    though the Americans had more technology and were more superior with bombs than the Vietcong they still had no sight of victory. Source G is a description of a chemical warfare attack by the Americans, using Napalm, which was their first chemical weapon; this had similar effects as weed killer because it burnt everything in its path.

  1. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    Day had been reporting the Vietnam War since it had begun only a few years prior to this seminar and was knowledgeable on the topic of why and when the war really developed in the full-scale conflict it did. This in turn means that the provenance is supported because we

  2. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    But searching and destroying the enemy was one thing, but all to often the enemy couldn't be founded and this got the American frustrated so they started to burn villages in sum cases the villages had no role in helping the Vietcong, these raids were known as the 'Zippo' raid after the lighter.

  1. Why USA lost the Vietnam War.

    The Viet Cong also had the support of the local villagers, comprising of mostly peasants, and this was beneficial to them in the long run in the sense that they were never low on troops who were eager to battle in order to secure their freedom.

  2. The Vietnam War.

    the United States assumes full responsibility for the training of South Vietnam's military forces. As the deadline for the Geneva reunification elections passes, a choice made by Diem, the United States chooses to support the decision in his refusal to hold them.(Karnow 233)

  1. How coverage of Vietnam in the USA led to demands for peace

    In particular, the camera of Kent State photojournalism student John Filo captured a fourteen-year old runaway, Mary Ann Vecchio, screaming over the body of the dead student, Jeffrey Miller, who had been shot in the mouth. The photograph (shown on the right), which won a Pulitzer Prize, became the most

  2. Why USA Lost the Vietnam War

    By this time Congress was dominated by ultra left liberals that wanted to see a Communist victory, not peace in Vietnam. Once Nixon was driven from power they cut off almost all aid to South Vietnam.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work