• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why the USA lost the Vietnam war.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WHY USA LOST THE VIETNAM WAR The Vietnam War or else known as the second Indochina war began in 1959 and lasted until April 30, 1975. It occurred in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia and fought between the North Vietnam (supported by communist allies) and the South Vietnam (supported by the United States and other member nations of the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO). It was fought to stop the spread of communism. The United States entered the war to prevent a communist takeover of South Vietnam as part of their wider strategy of containment. Military advisors arrived in 1950. U.S. involvement increased in the early 1960s deploy combat units were sent to Vietnam in 1965.The Americans decided to leave Vietnam in 1973. ...read more.

Middle

Not only that, but US soldiers' weapons were being supplied from 8,000 miles away and the Vietcong were being supplied by China and Russia which weren't so far away. Due to unfamiliarity to their way of fighting the US soldiers were unable to beat the Vietcong therefore becoming weak and heading for failure. Another reasons for the defeat was due to the lack of experience of the US soldiers, the treatment of the black soldiers - they were used as bait, and most of the soldiers took drugs, shot their officers and deserted whereas the Vietcong were very determined to drive the Americans out at whatever cost - they were motivated . The war became unpopular in US and lost public support because people didn't know why they should support it when it was 8,000 miles away. ...read more.

Conclusion

Whereas the Vietcong were very prepared (as they were at war so much), motivated and determined to fight. The Vietcong also fought a guerrilla war which was unfamiliar to the soldiers. The war resulted in 58,152 US deaths because of their weakness and the tactic the Vietcong used which was called 'hanging onto the belts'. This was when they stayed very close to the US troops so that when they attacked, the US could not defeat them without killing their own men. Overall, in my opinion I think that the US involvement was not completely necessary and because of that they were defeated. There were many reasons for why US lost and the one I consider as the main reason is the inexperience. Without the financial reasons, US might not have been able to leave Vietnam therefore resulting in more unnecessary deaths. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    take much from it and also because of the title it would make you think that it was worse than it was. The description shows that when the Americans were bombing Vietnam they were starting to get desperate and were still loosing the war despite having the most superior bomber

  2. Why USA lost the Vietnam War.

    The Viet Cong also had the support of the local villagers, comprising of mostly peasants, and this was beneficial to them in the long run in the sense that they were never low on troops who were eager to battle in order to secure their freedom.

  1. Why did the USA become involvedin Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s?

    Kennedy's successor, Lyndon Johnson, also believed in the Domino Theory, but wanted to concentrate more on America, and building a 'Great Society', but instead found himself stuck in a war on the other side of the world. Johnson realised that if he was going to win this war, he would need to do more than send some money and advisors.

  2. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    seems almost like a paradox - the righteousness of that word compared with the conditions that were faced on the ground in Vietnam. As it focuses towards these aspects more than the other possible reasons for the anti-war movement, it may be seen as not that useful; however, I would strongly discourage any sort of thinking along that line.

  1. The Vietnam War.

    As 1957 rolls around, President Diem makes a visit to the United States to address a joint session of Congress and, in turn, received a declaration of support from President Eisenhower. In October of 1957, Vietminh soldiers hiding in South Vietnam start to become hostile towards Diem's military personnel.

  2. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    Sharpened bamboo stakes hidden in shallow pits covered by leafs and sticks. But what the North Vietnamese and the Vietcong feared the most were bombing raid from the American planes. The Americans had developed a variety of bombs the cluster bomb were called the 'mother bomb' by the Vietnamese they

  1. How coverage of Vietnam in the USA led to demands for peace

    the United States, 28 percent as defeats, and 2 percent as inconclusive. After Tet, 44 percent of the battles were deemed victories, 32 percent defeats, and 24 percent inconclusive." (Hallin, 1986, p.161-162). The Tet Offensive was probably instrumental in causing a major reassessment of U.S.

  2. Why USA Lost the Vietnam War

    It was a failure of the political will of the Democrats who who controlled Congress in 1975 and abandon our allies in the end and allowed them to be overrun by their enemies. The USA failed in Vietnam because the whole war was wrong.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work