Why was Europe at the Brink of Change at the Turn of the Twentieth Century.

Authors Avatar

John Ryding

Why was Europe at the Brink of Change at the Turn of the Twentieth Century                      

The defeat of Napoleon in the early part of the 19th century inspired among European nations the desire that another dictator and his country should never be allowed to upset the delicate balance of empires that was prevalent at that time.  At the 1815 Congress of Vienna, saw countries come together to agree how Europe should be restored after the ravages of the Napoleonic Wars, it was agreed that the empires and Kings who dominated Europe should work together in what was called The Concert of Europe.  This period brought economic and military stability in the years up to the 1870’s.  However there a certain factors that brought an end to this, in this essay, I will discuss; how the rise of nationalism threatened Empires, how in Russia, the autocratic system of government became threatened by the peoples will for democracy, and the formation of the German state and how this created tension in central Europe.  

During the 18th century, nationalism - the belief that loyalty to a person's nation and its political and economic goals comes before any other public loyalty - took hold among people who shared a common language, history, or culture.  Such people began to view themselves as members a national group or nation.  Nationalism led to the creation of two new powers - Italy and Germany - through the uniting of many small states.  On the other hand, nationalism weakened the eastern European empires of Austria-Hungary, Russia, and Ottoman Turkey.  The Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires in particular began to find it increasingly difficult, due to a drain on economic and military power, to keep these new nations under their influence.  In 1828, Greece successful gained its independence from the Ottoman Empire, setting a precedent to other similar sized, often smaller nations, to seek their own freedom.  1896, also saw the inaugural Olympic Games.  Foreign leaders and diplomats were keen to espouse the peaceful nature of the games however, the Frenchman Henri Massis wrote, “Sport calls for endurance and sangfroid, the military virtues, and it keeps youth in a warlike frame of mind.”  (Quote, Ferro, La Grande Guerre, 1969 pg15)  As people realised that they could support their national sporting heroes on the world stage, sympathetic press and pro-nationalist leaders realised that if fellow nationals could be made to unite and support an athlete then they could also unite and sue for independence.

Join now!

As well as the rise of nationalism in the Balkan states, Russia faced its own internal problems.  As other Tsars before him, Alexander II, believed strongly in the principles of conservatism and autocracy, however his country’s emphatic defeat in the Crimean war led him to institute changes in Russia that would put his country on a par with other European states.  The peasants in Russia were still the property of their landowner, this lead to the emancipation of the serfs.  The result was disastrous, the serfs who were freed were disappointed and enraged as they had to pay compensation to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay