• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the Edwardian times a 'golden age'?

Extracts from this document...


Why was the Edwardian times a 'golden age'? The Edwardian period is supposedly one which is superior to any other period in recent history, one where the British empire was at it's peak, and where the people were very patriotic. Young boys enjoyed cricket, football, rugby and even camping. Bachelors travelled Europe freely meantime women copied the latest European fashions and hairstyles. Similarly, the rest of the world saw success; Madame curie discovers radioactivity while the first Nobel Prize is awarded. The Wright Brothers launch an aeroplane, Henry Ford mass produces his car as Albert Einstein unveils the theory of relativity. Despite all of this, was life as great as it appeared to be? Did everybody really live in this perfect world? Or was it just for the people who could afford it? England was a dominant force in the civilised world, it's empire was one of the largest, and greatly influenced so much of the world. ...read more.


The middle class was relatively well off and had at least one servant in a decent house. However the poor usually grew families in very cramped small rooms. Men in this class, working in industry would earn little more than �1 a week, woman less than this. Consequently, independent research showed evidence about people in poverty. For example, Charles Booth discovered in 1903 that one third of London was in 'dire poverty'. David Lloyd George, the chancellor of exchequer at the time, was intrigued by his findings, himself having first hand experience in poverty. Research was followed through by Seebohm Rowntree in York, a friend of, and under the influence of David George. His research found that the cause of poverty was linked to ill health, low wage, unemployment or old age rather than drinking or gambling addictions. He also found out that families were usually in the situation of poverty either when 'they were young', or when 'they were too old for work'. ...read more.


People thought it was better to be in difficult money situations rather than the women being at work. Although in some cases, the money problems were so dire, they had to work. Woman who had the same jobs as men, would get paid less than a man would, this sexism aroused scepticism. It was because of the help of woman in the brutal war times that people considered the idea. In conclusion, it is clear that the Edwardian Period was not at all a 'golden age', but still had many impurities in it. There was an evident split amongst the citizens, dire poverty and strong sexism. I believe this idea of a 'golden age' could have emerged from the patriotism felt by the richer people. I also believe that this label owed itself to nostalgia. Looking back at the Edwardian Period must have seemed like a 'golden age' in the horrific wars that followed. The long years marred by wars and depressions, independent spirits drained and worn out, the most likely reason for this name is nostalgia. Therefore, the Edwardian 'golden age' did not exist. Arti Vaghela History 16/09/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Women & the British Car Industry

    Advertisement 1 shows a model sat in the car which doesn't contribute to the car industry at all, let alone significantly. Advertisement 2 also portrays women as ditzy and insignificant the advert implies women wouldn't buy or drive a car which shows the attitude the car industry itself had towards women's role in it.

  2. Britain in The Age of Total War

    It is because of this, source D was published and source B was not. Source D would not have been so demoralizing and source B, which has dead bodies, compared to damaged buildings and property in the streets, would have.

  1. Britain in the Age of Total War

    label of "sorting personal property" on both sources to keep morale up. The source's are also alike as they show the British "grit", although Source C could have been staged and Source B had a more angered and fearful image than the image from the label.

  2. Britain in the Age of Total War, 1939-45

    killed as a result of the bombing could have been demoralising for the people. It could also have lead to the suggestion that Britain were incapable of winning the war. This would not encourage people to do their bit to help with the war effort.

  1. Britain in the Age of Total War, 1939-45.

    In source B I can see the evidence as it is a photograph and I can see how the Blitz effected people as the photograph shows a picture of a bombed school and there are bodies in sacks. Also I can learn that the government wanted to keep morale of

  2. Britain in the age of total war 1939-1945.

    Source C is also a photograph, and is dated 15 September 1940. The photograph shows a number of men, women and children gathered together smiling, waving and with their thumbs up standing in front of various pieces of furniture. There is also a caption which was published with it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work