• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the Treaty of Versailles so Controversial?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was the Treaty of Versailles so Controversial? The Treaty of Versailles is one of the most controversial international agreements. Many observers both politicians and historians have tended to blame the rise of the Nazis, Hitler and the outbreak of World War II on the Versailles peace settlement. For example the historian A.J.P Taylor condemned the Treaty particularly the reparations payments and the creation of Poland. The British economist John Maynard Keynes denounced the treaty claiming that it was too harsh on Germany and was particularly opposed to the consequences of the heavy reparations payments imposed on Germany claiming that they were impossible for Germany to pay. However Germany only had to pay a small figure of the total reparations. The main reasons for the controversy surrounding the Versailles peace agreement are: * The treaty failed to create a new balance of power. In the east a number of small unstable states such as Poland emerged. Britain and France only gained a short term advantage from this and they were too divided by mutual suspicions to implement the Treaty in the post war years * The key weakness in the treaty was that America who had played such an important point in negotiating the Treaty was prevented by the American senate form helping to execute and enforce the Treaty. * However to some extent when viewed from the perspective of 1945, the treaty does not seem to be harsh on Germany as they were still a great power. ...read more.

Middle

Wilson wanted to weaken Germany's military potential for all times, but he had nothing against a democratic Germany becoming a major economic power again and felt strongly about leaving it unified. He feared that an all too weak Germany might inspire France to strive for domination on the European continent. The problem was that the United States was not prepared to assume the new responsibilities it faced as a world power. As the main creditor of the Entente, it had only a short-term interest in European stability and in French and British wealth. The British economist John Maynard Keynes argued that the political and economic prosperity of Europe depended upon a German recovery. He prophesised that the German reparations would keep Germany impoverished and ultimately threaten all of Europe; this is shown to pass with the German invasion of Poland in 1939 creating the conflict of World War II. Keynes was a British economist present at the peace conference in 1919 and would therefore have firsthand knowledge of the negotiations. However the historian Rupert Lowe believes that Keynes was wrong and that helping both Britain and Germany made things worse not better. As already mentioned Keynes opinion on the treaty is more validated due to the first hand experience of the events surrounding the treaty, however due to this Keynes maybe biased towards the opinion that the treaty was harsh on Germany. ...read more.

Conclusion

It was too harsh to reconcile Germany with its former war enemies and to integrate it into a lasting peaceful post-war order, and it was too mild to weaken Germany so as to make it impossible for it to ever again become a great power. The actual peace terms harshly disappointed the Germans, who felt that they radically contradicted the promises Wilson had made to the pre revolutionary German governments. The Germans, felt betrayed by Wilson and the United States. However to some extent when viewed from the perspective of 1945, the treaty does not seem to be harsh on Germany as they were still a great power. Most treaties are meant to be a compromise, where there are always attempts to change parts that one party does not like. It is therefore quite possible that the majority of the territorial clauses of the treaty did represent a genuine compromise between the aims of the allies and Wilson's fourteen points. The treaty failed to create a new balance of power. In the east a number of small unstable states such as Poland emerged. Britain and France only gained a short term advantage from this and they were too divided by mutual suspicions to implement the Treaty in the post war years The key weakness in the treaty was that America who had played such an important point in negotiating the Treaty was prevented by the American senate that refused to ratify the treaty, from helping to execute and enforce the Treaty. Peter Styles ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    n with terrible weapons after all the horrors they committed. The Allies split the Germany into two different zones. This is which resulted in the formation of two separate countries, which were not reunited until 1989. Now that it has passed fifty years since the 2nd World War, Germany has changed in many ways.

  2. Was Hitler the cause of WW2? A.J.P Taylor wrote the controversial The origins ...

    Overall, I think the most important factor behind the outbreak of World War 2 was World War 1 because at the end of the First World War, many of the arguments that caused it still needed to be settled.

  1. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    the population and a collapse of the organization that Europe was based upon, not to mention the obscuration and the hiding of the civilization to desperately satisfy the immense need of the despaired individual. On the 13th of May 1919, Count Brockdorff-Rantzau addressed to the Peace Conference of the Allied and Associated Powers the Report of the German Economic commission.

  2. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    The treaty itself to the revisionist historians were unjustifiable which itself was a view that was dominant throughout the 1960�s and the view held on to many people which made it seem like a chimera where a view that was believed for so long that it had to be true.

  1. Wilson's Fourteen Points became the basis of the Treaty of Versailles, which was an ...

    Also from the Fourteen Points the United States retrieved more of a say towards the peace treaty, as well as a voice out to other countries showing people what we were about. On the other hand the Fourteen Points demanded for the freedom of seas, which was bad for Britain.

  2. German reaction to the Treaty of Versailles. The aims of Hitler and the ...

    * In 1934 Hitler ordered the German armed forces to rearm and prepare for war. * In 1935 Germany reintroduced conscription breaking the Treaty of Versailles. Germany built tanks, aeroplanes and submarines breaking the Treaty of Versailles. * In 1936 Germany remilitarises the Rhineland in violation of the Treaty of Versailles.

  1. "The Versailles Peace Settlement failed to secure British Foreign Policy interests"

    government, or by voting with the party in power to prevent its defeat. Britain also needed to be defended both internally and externally. The trade routes that Britain used were mainly through france and Germany into other neighbouring countries, without this entry, Britains trade would decrease, meaning unemployment and reduced customer demand.

  2. Woodrow Wilson's Views and the Peace Treaty.

    Obviously, Clemenceau liked the idea of seeing Germany split in two, as it separated Germany into two parts which could potentially harm the strength of the country. Therefore, he gave his full support to the Polish people?s demands. Lloyd George although had very similar views to Wilson on this issue,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work