• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the Treaty of Versailles so Controversial?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was the Treaty of Versailles so Controversial? The Treaty of Versailles is one of the most controversial international agreements. Many observers both politicians and historians have tended to blame the rise of the Nazis, Hitler and the outbreak of World War II on the Versailles peace settlement. For example the historian A.J.P Taylor condemned the Treaty particularly the reparations payments and the creation of Poland. The British economist John Maynard Keynes denounced the treaty claiming that it was too harsh on Germany and was particularly opposed to the consequences of the heavy reparations payments imposed on Germany claiming that they were impossible for Germany to pay. However Germany only had to pay a small figure of the total reparations. The main reasons for the controversy surrounding the Versailles peace agreement are: * The treaty failed to create a new balance of power. In the east a number of small unstable states such as Poland emerged. Britain and France only gained a short term advantage from this and they were too divided by mutual suspicions to implement the Treaty in the post war years * The key weakness in the treaty was that America who had played such an important point in negotiating the Treaty was prevented by the American senate form helping to execute and enforce the Treaty. * However to some extent when viewed from the perspective of 1945, the treaty does not seem to be harsh on Germany as they were still a great power. ...read more.

Middle

Wilson wanted to weaken Germany's military potential for all times, but he had nothing against a democratic Germany becoming a major economic power again and felt strongly about leaving it unified. He feared that an all too weak Germany might inspire France to strive for domination on the European continent. The problem was that the United States was not prepared to assume the new responsibilities it faced as a world power. As the main creditor of the Entente, it had only a short-term interest in European stability and in French and British wealth. The British economist John Maynard Keynes argued that the political and economic prosperity of Europe depended upon a German recovery. He prophesised that the German reparations would keep Germany impoverished and ultimately threaten all of Europe; this is shown to pass with the German invasion of Poland in 1939 creating the conflict of World War II. Keynes was a British economist present at the peace conference in 1919 and would therefore have firsthand knowledge of the negotiations. However the historian Rupert Lowe believes that Keynes was wrong and that helping both Britain and Germany made things worse not better. As already mentioned Keynes opinion on the treaty is more validated due to the first hand experience of the events surrounding the treaty, however due to this Keynes maybe biased towards the opinion that the treaty was harsh on Germany. ...read more.

Conclusion

It was too harsh to reconcile Germany with its former war enemies and to integrate it into a lasting peaceful post-war order, and it was too mild to weaken Germany so as to make it impossible for it to ever again become a great power. The actual peace terms harshly disappointed the Germans, who felt that they radically contradicted the promises Wilson had made to the pre revolutionary German governments. The Germans, felt betrayed by Wilson and the United States. However to some extent when viewed from the perspective of 1945, the treaty does not seem to be harsh on Germany as they were still a great power. Most treaties are meant to be a compromise, where there are always attempts to change parts that one party does not like. It is therefore quite possible that the majority of the territorial clauses of the treaty did represent a genuine compromise between the aims of the allies and Wilson's fourteen points. The treaty failed to create a new balance of power. In the east a number of small unstable states such as Poland emerged. Britain and France only gained a short term advantage from this and they were too divided by mutual suspicions to implement the Treaty in the post war years The key weakness in the treaty was that America who had played such an important point in negotiating the Treaty was prevented by the American senate that refused to ratify the treaty, from helping to execute and enforce the Treaty. Peter Styles ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    As the Allies liberated the death camps throughout Europe, people everywhere were shocked. Between the years 1945 and 1949, many Nazi leaders were put on trial for the war crimes that they had committed against humanity. While on trial, these men claimed that they were only following orders.

  2. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    the population and a collapse of the organization that Europe was based upon, not to mention the obscuration and the hiding of the civilization to desperately satisfy the immense need of the despaired individual. On the 13th of May 1919, Count Brockdorff-Rantzau addressed to the Peace Conference of the Allied and Associated Powers the Report of the German Economic commission.

  1. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    - Independence of Serbia and Bulgaria * Both Serbia and Bulgaria were controlled by the Turks for many years. * But both wanted to fight against Turks and get independence. * After the Treaty of Adrianople, Serbia was under Russian control.

  2. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    in full and this forced Britain and France to keep the reparation payments in order to comply with the demands from the USA.

  1. Wish there was a Lord Keynes here, today?

    enriched ourselves, even if it did not sow the decay of the whole civilized life of Europe." Keyness was aware of the need to satisfy domestic lobbies but he also alerted the leaders of the then civilized world of 2 important principles.

  2. Explain how the Treaty of Versailles created problems for Germany between 1919-24.

    With Eisner dead, the moderate socialists and the communists argued about which of them should take his place. The communists soon got their own way and in March 1919 made Bavaria into a soviet republic on Russian lines. They made the lives of people in Munich hell and the government in Weinmar put Munich under siege.

  1. Analyse the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Versailles Settlement.

    While restrictions sought to rest Anglo-|German naval rivalries, peacemakers were concerned Germany be left strong enough to battle the threat of communism. Henig8 states that the Germans knew this from the conference beginning, they had convinced themselves of it. The assembled delegates notion that a relatively strong Germany would not

  2. Woodrow Wilson's Views and the Peace Treaty.

    also knew that splitting Germany in two would give him support at home. On this matter, I agree with Wilson. I believe that in order for one country to gain access to the sea one cannot harm the people of another country; the German people who were to live were.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work