• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the Tsar's government overthrown in February/March 1917

Extracts from this document...


Why was the Tsar's government overthrown in February/March 1917? The February/March revolution of 1917 in Russia, which resulted in the Tsar being overthrown, and a new provisional government replacing him, with the intentions of establishing a liberal republic, was the result of several mainly long-term factors, which can be grouped into four main categories of economic, political, military and social factors:- Economic The economic causes of the Russian Revolution largely originated in Russia's slightly outdated economy. Russia's agriculture was largely based on independent peasants, who seldom owned modern machinery. Suffering from a naturally cold climate, Russia's growing season was only 4-6 months, compared to 8-9 in most of Western Europe. However, vast territory and population still allowed Russia to be the largest exporter of agricultural products in the world, even supplying North America in the 1900's. Russia was still developing modern infrastructure and transport systems. Despite vast expansions under Sergei Witte to the railway system, Russia lacked the ability to effectively transport food over great distances. ...read more.


These unfulfilled hopes of democracy fuelled revolutionary ideas and violence targeted at the Tsarist regime. Social The social causes of the Russian Revolution mainly came from centuries of oppression towards the lower classes by the Tsarist regime and Nicholas's failures in World War I. While rural agrarian peasants had been emancipated from serfdom in 1861, they still resented paying redemption payments to the state, and demanded communal tender of the land they worked. Increasing peasant disturbances and sometimes full revolts occurred, with the goal of securing ownership of their land. The rapid industrialization of Russia also resulted in urban overcrowding and poor conditions for urban industrial workers (as mentioned above). Between 1890 and 1910, the population of the capital of St Petersburg swelled from 1,033,600 to 1,905,600, with Moscow experiencing similar growth. In one 1904 survey, it was found that an average of sixteen people shared each apartment in St Petersburg, with six people per room. There was also no running water, and piles of human waste were a threat to the health of the workers. ...read more.


The food shortages and famine which were being suffered by the majority of the Russian population were also crucial in contributing to the 1917 revolution as it further demonstrated the Tsar and his government's incompetency and even a possible lack of regard for the hardships of his people, in not trying harder with more success to grow enough crops to feed both his citizens and the soldiers on the front fighting a war with Germany for Russia. The relative strength, influence and widespread support for such groups as the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks also contributed to the Tsar's downfall, as when groups such as these supported and contributed to revolution, it meant large amounts of mainly working class people from industrial towns also supported the revolution. No one single factor was behind the February/March revolution in 1917, but instead the accumulation and combination of the many things described above led to the outpouring of feelings of discontent and dissatisfaction became so strong that they spilled over into a revolution, which the Tsar simply did not have the strength or support to stop. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    Of two reasons, which possibly could have forced Nicholas to abdicate, I believe that the fact that he could no longer control the workers in his capital city is the most important. If Nicholas had heeded Rodzianko's warning he might have been able to regain control, but he decided to ignore the warning and so led to his own downfall.

  2. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    Tsar was very cruel to his opposition and the Okhrana, the secret police dealt with them. If there were strikes, protests or riots, which often took place in times of famine, the much-feared Cossacks stopped them with great force and brutality.

  1. Long and short-term causes contributed to the March 1917 Revolution.

    In the 1900, 84% of the population were peasants, they were very resentful towards the aristocracy of Russia who had three-quarters of the land but only made up 2% of the population. The middle classes of Russia contributed to 14% of the population, they also had no say in the government and the civil services were often corrupt.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    The Tsar himself did not help matters - he was strongly criticised for some of his decisions and was seen by some Russians as wholly unsuitable to be a ruler. This is illustrated by sources C and D. In source C, the writer says 'He had not sought power and

  1. To what extent was the Revolution of February/march, in Russia 1917, due to the ...

    The effect of this was to inspire interest and support for revolutionary activity, and as they were a large number of people concentrated in small areas, their potential to become a threatening mob increased. The Tsar struggled with this dilemma of having to modernize to keep up with the rapidly

  2. The February Revolution 1917.

    It shows that there are a lot of people on the verge of despair and that they are on thin ice towards revolting which supports the fact of major growing unrest. And In my opinion makes Source D more useful and reliable than Source C.

  1. The February Revolution 1917 - Was Nicholas responsible for his own downfall?

    thinks that the strikes are not serious and everything will die down in time. However her and therefore the Tsar are obviously wrong because looking at other point of view from that time, revolution is quite likely. The next reason is the fact that the soldiers have begun to mutiny.

  2. Russia's involvement in WW1 was the main reason for the March 1917 revolution - ...

    He used the Church to get to the Russian people they were brainwashed into thinking Tsar Nicolas was G-D.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work