• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the Tsarist regime able to survive the revolution of 1905?

Extracts from this document...


01.11.02 Why was the Tsarist regime able to survive the revolution of 1905? First of all to understand how the Tsarist regime managed to survive the revolution of 1905 we need to take a closer look at what actually happened during 1905 and then possible to look at how the Tsar tackled these problems and therefore we can build up a picture of how they survived. There were many factors which led to the 1905 revolution, many of them long term causes and a couple which were short term but really blew things up in Russia and got the people very angry, causing them to revolt. The social aspect of Russia was in turmoil what with the rapid industrialisation. This meant that people had no legal way of expressing their political views, the working class people were dis-contented and oppressed, working conditions were extremely poor in most areas and the jobs paid very little for the long hours of labour. The peasants, many of them part of the working class were desperate and poverty stricken. The peasants owned no land for themselves and poor harvests along with extortionate taxes applied by the Tsar to pay for the industrialisation meant that they were crippled. The middle class were also dis-contented at the time because of a lack of political involvement for the majority of this sector. All of this accumulated to the majority of Russian society being against the state, only the state-dependent industrialists and the army supported the state. ...read more.


This stated: that a parliament or duma elected by the people, civil rights e.g. freedom of speech and conscience and uncensored newspapers and the right to form political parties. The Duma would share power with the Tsar and therefore people would have more of a say. At first the Tsar was unwilling to sign but he realised that this was the only way to end the revolution and so this was signed and proposed to the people on 30th Oct 1905. This resulted in the liberals and middle classes believing that they had won democratic government and meant that they stopped their protests and began to support the government again and work with what they had achieved. I think though that they may have had clouded mis-judgment though when they accepted the terms as I think that the people knew the Tsar well enough to realise that he would work the manifesto to his benefit and retain full control of Russia. The Tsar was though very devious later on, after the manifesto was issued but the parties may have been a little bit na�ve in believing he would carry out everything that he said he would do. Not everyone though was satisfied with the October Manifest and they realised what little was being offered to them and so decided to carry on with their revolution. They were now though very much the weaker side what with the majority of Russia once again supporting the Tsar and so Nicholas found it much easier to suppress their oppositions and disturbances without any more damage to his name. ...read more.


All the workers were made to begin employment again or face thugs going into the countryside to beat or kill them. I think that this may have stirred up yet more hatred towards the Tsar as they would have felt worthless and un-important to him. He did not care enough to give them any democratic rights and he had his men killing them if they demonstrated to show their dis-content. I believe that dis-content never fully went away with certain parties and social classes in Russia but they had to accept defeat as the main opposition were happy with the October Manifest. As we have seen they were however wrong to accept the manifesto as the Tsar managed to reverse the whole manifest via the fundamental laws because his troops remained loyal and would back should any opposition try to create another overthrow when the fundamental laws were issued. The troops and the autocracy, the most powerful people still believed in the Tsar and this was his most powerful asset. If he lost them he would quite easily be pushed off the throne. As I mentioned when analysing Trotsky's quote I think that 1905 was a dress rehearsal for 1917 when a full blown revolution took place, the Tsar had to abdicate as even his troops went against. The Tsar led a very specific and well thought out regime and his ministers worked it well to ensure that he survived this set of event in 1905, relatively unscathed as once again he took full control of Russia and its government. Elizabeth Power 12mco History essay - how did Tsar survive the 1905 revolution Page1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. "Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905 but not that of March ...

    They regularly suffered famines. Also the Russian population rose by nearly 50% in the previous 60 years which meant that the peasant population was also increasing which was putting more pressure on the land.

  2. Why was Nicholas II able to survive the 1905 revolution but was forced to ...

    February 1917 can be seen as leaderless in a different way. The main revolutionary leaders were in exile. The members of their groups by this time were accustomed to absent leaders, were more capable. Though few emerged as individual leaders, they were able to direct their groups through these masses towards clearer goals.

  1. How did the Tsar survive the 1905 Revolution?

    Peasant discontent was heightened by fear of what they believed was the government's reclamation of property where mortgages had not yet been paid back. The assertion of national minorities amidst the turbulence found perhaps highest form in Georgia's declaration of independence.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    This is true because the 'commitern' that Trotsky set up to export communism worldwide was disbanded because Stalin did not trust foreigners. Source H claims that Stalin was a monster, no a man, because he was paranoid and killed people for no apparent reason other than his own suspicions.

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the 1905 revolution but not the 1917 revolution?

    These led to the Tsar losing his trust again. One major problem for the Tsar was himself. One of the reasons he survived the 1905 revolution was by accepting the October manifesto. When he broke the promise he proved that he couldn't be trusted and lost the loyalty of the peasants.

  2. Why did the Tsar Abdicate after the 1917 Revolution but not after the 1905 ...

    This huge spurt of growth in the population meant peasants were receiving less land to grow food and homes were becoming crowded with whole families being crammed into one room. Many young men fled, or were forced from their villages to go and work in the cities.


    Although Alexander II had made some progress in modernising Russia's economy, Britain and Germany were now forging ahead even more quickly. Russia was a difficult country to industrialise, due mainly to its size and the problem it had with serfdom.

  2. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    winter palace in order to present a petition to reform their living conditions. The peasants and working class of Russia were outraged at their living status and demanded improvement such as the right to have trade unions and an end to war with Japan.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work