• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there a revolution in Russia in 1905?

Extracts from this document...


Why was there a revolution in Russia in 1905? Imperial Russia was a vast land, divided geographically but also riven politically, socially, ethnically, religiously and economically. Russia was an autocratic state. The political and constitutional power was centralised in the Tsar. In 1832 Tsar Nicholas I published a compilation, the Collected Laws of the Russian Empire which summarised the political system of Imperial Russia. It stated: 'The Emperor of all the Russians is an autocratic and unlimited monarch; God himself ordains that all must bow to his supreme power, not only out of fear but also out of conscience.' It is not surprising then that Russia was governed ruthlessly by successive Tsars and that Russia was a deeply divided society and each of the frustrated elements within it - the peasants, the industrial working class, the minorities and political extremists - all had different aspirations. The great bulk of the Russian people were peasants. By the Edict of Emancipation of 1861, Alexander II had ended the system by which peasants were owned by landlords and had no land of their own. The Edict freed them from serfdom and provided them with some land, but this land was generally poor and overcrowded. ...read more.


While this caused few problems in the 'home' provinces, in the more distant and outlying provinces, some of which were relatively recent additions to the Empire, these attempts led to opposition and discontent. Russification in Poland, for example, caused a huge outbreak of nationalism. This Polish nationalism proved to be a great rallying force that cut through political barriers in Poland. Groups like the 'Proletariat' and the 'National League' were determined to oppose Russian domination. Workers and peasants were the main reason for political opposition, as they were demanding rights and representation. The 'Social Revolutionaries' appointed themselves as aids to the vast peasantry of the Russian Empire. They were established in 1901, a follow on from 'The Populist movement' and concentrated on advocating terrorism as a means of achieving their objectives. The 'Social Democrats' were few in number and in 1903 split in two (the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks). They aided the working class and based their arguments on the principles of Marx. The Liberals also posed a political threat to the Tsar, they were made up of intellectuals and had a chain of business and family links. They expressed the need for freedom of speech and freedom of assembly etc. They managed to deliver their opinions through the Union of Unions in May 1905. ...read more.


This event caused a nationwide outbreak of disorder and with what followed many acts of terrorism and violence along with numerous strikes. These incidents were made worse by Russia's humiliating defeat against Japan. Further peasant dissatisfaction was caused by the governments attempt to seize their property due to failure to pay off mortgages, thus leading to thousands of peasant petitions and calls for reform. Many heard these calls and groups like the 'Union of Unions' (set up in May 1905) organised an alliance between themselves, workers and peasants. Non-Russians started to lift their heads and realised that the time was ripe for them to live their dreams and desires. They longed for the destruction of the Tsarist system. In conclusion there were various reasons as to why a revolution occurred in 1905: long term dissatisfaction by many classes: the peasants, industrial working class, minorities and political extremists; they all added to the build up of negative views and attitudes to the Tsarist regime. It was inevitable there would be a revolution, but it specifically occurred in 1905 due to factors such as the assassination of Plehve, 'Bloody Sunday' and political rivalry (e.g. 'Union of Unions' and the 'Paris Bloc'). Robert McEwan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Was the Russian government policy towards the peasants and the workers in Russia from ...

    When in 1820, the spread of European revolution had convinced Alexander I that encouragement given to liberalism was at the same time encouraging revolution. He turned to reactionary. When Nicholas I became the Tsar in 1825, the pressure for the abolition of serfdom grew rapidly.

  2. Explain why there was an Industrial Revolution

    A further cause of the Industrial Revolution was Britain's farmers producing more food. Once the population began to rise, there were more and more people needing food. Farmers could charge higher prices, make bigger profit and still sell all their produce.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    The growth of the economy meant a steady improvement in living standards. The great majority of Russians in the past period possessed such things as TV sets, refrigerators and washing machines. And all this had been achieved without unemployment or inflation.

  2. Why was the Tsarist regime able to survive the revolution of 1905?

    people of Russia as even if they had lost the war humiliatingly at least the peace treaty was not the same and the ministers thought that this may hopefully improve the Tsar's image, even if just slightly so. A major plus point from the end of the war was that

  1. Why was there a revolution in Russia in 1905

    Since landlords could not, or would not, pay labourers and since the peasants could not afford land themselves, almost a quarter of the previously cultivated area fell into disuse. The rapidly increasing population put great pressure of existing resources of food, especially in times of bad harvest.

  2. To what extent was the storming of the Bastille the most significant event of ...

    To generalise, it seems that while the economic situation alone cannot be attributed to the outbreak of the revolution, the crises contributed to the mergence of the major 'popular movement', made up of discontented workers and small traders. While political affairs and economic ones cannot be totally distinguished, without the

  1. 'Only Alexander II's policies made significant progress in avoiding revolution in Russia.' How valid ...

    In the reforms he gave power to the localities themselves through elected assemblies, via the introduction of the zemstva. This was certainly a change as previously the tsar himself had complete power, although the actual power of the zemstva was extremely limited.


    Russia suffered its worst famine of the nineteenth century, costing 1.5 - 2 million lives as well as brutally exposing the shortcomings of government policy. The catastrophe of the famine cost Vyshnegradsky his job and he was replaced by Sergei Witte in 1892.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work