• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there a revolution in Russia in the spring of 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Why was there a revolution in Russia in the spring of 1917? By 1917 the Romanovs, Russia's royal family had been controlling Russia for over three hundred years. Russia was an autocracy, which meant that the Tsar had total power. Although there was a parliament, the Duma, it had little influence and could only criticize the Tsar's government. Tsar Nicholas II, who was in control at the time, was a weak and incompetent ruler. He allowed himself to be influenced by people who did not want any changes to take place in Russia. It is very clear that Russia at this time was still very much a "19th century country in a 20th century world" and the terrible circumstances of the ordinary people illustrate this fact. There were still huge differences between the rich and the poor. About four-fifths of the population were peasants, many of whom could not read or write. In the towns workers were squashed into very poor accommodation and received little pay for long days. People were terrified of speaking out about the harsh conditions as the Tsar's government often used violence against the people. During an attempt at a revolution in 1905 over 9,000 people were executed. If there were disturbances in the streets the government would use Cossacks (soldiers from southern Russia) ...read more.


Due to this she relied heavily on the influence of Gregory Rasputin a "mad monk" believed to have powerful visions and healing powers. Alexandra thought her son would die without Rasputin and he became her constant companion. The Russian people disliked Rasputin even more than the Tsarina, as it was well known that Rasputin was Alexandra's closest confidant. They suspected he was trying to control Russia through her and he became known sarcastically as the "true lord of All the Russia's". During his many drunken parties, the monk would boast of his exploits with the Empress and her daughters, even going as far as proclaiming that the Tsar was at his fingertips. After several attempts, Rasputin was finally murdered in 1916, by cyanide poisoning. Despite the many problems outlined, the Tsar did not think that any single one could cause a powerful enough revolution to overcome the entire tsarist empire and he constantly ignored the Dumas's plea of help. Yet, despite this no one anticipated the very sudden and unexpected revolution ended the Romanov dynasty in less then a week in March of 1917. The revolution had not been planned, nor was it directed by any organized political group. ...read more.


When he finally arrived, his train was stopped. With no military backing or parliamentary support (the majority of the Dumas supported the people and had ignored the Tsars orders for them to disband), the last Romanov tsar Nicholas II, abdicated the throne on March 2 (or on March 15th) on behalf of himself and his son. His brother, Grand Duke Michael, in whose favour Nicholas had abdicated, followed suit. The Russian Empire was without an emperor and The Romanov dynasty, which had held power for over three hundred years, was over. Overall, I conclude that there was no single cause to the revolution in the spring of 1917. One simple protest due to bread and wage shortages could not have gone so far had other factors not been involved. It was more the accumulation of social and economic hardships combined with the negatives attitudes towards the royal family and its system of government. The country's economic condition was very backward, which made it unable to sustain the war effort against powerful, industrialized Germany. Russian manpower was virtually inexhaustible. Russian industry, however, lacked the capacity to arm, equip, and supply the some 15 million men who were sent into the war. When these harsh factors are examined it is not surprising that protests were ignited by the Russian people, leading to the overthrow of the Tsar and the ending of the Romanov dynasty. Katie Taylor 10H 4/27/07 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    Eventually he gave in and issued the 'October Manifesto' on 30th October. This promised: 1. A parliament or Duma elected by the people 2. Civil rights - e.g. freedom of speech and conscience 3. Uncensored newspapers and he right to form political parties As a result, the liberals and middle

  2. Long and short-term causes contributed to the March 1917 Revolution.

    The railway systems fell into chaos and trainloads of food were left rotting in the sidings. Many factories closed, causing great levels of unemployment. Because of the shortages, the prices of goods were rising continually, but wages were not, the workers had to work more hours.

  1. Why was there a German revolution in 1918 and how far had it gone ...

    Also as a result of the revolution Ebert and the working class won concessions. Trade unions were given negotiating rights with employers on pay and working conditions and an 8 hour working day. This was clearly an achievement gained a result of the revolution of 1918.

  2. To what extent was the Revolution of February/march, in Russia 1917, due to the ...

    1917, due to the nature of Tsarism and the policies of Nicholas II, it is important to understand the perspectives of the two dominant schools of history. The Liberal Schools, also known as the 'Optimists,' believe in 'evolution' - that Russia was gradually developing towards a modern and democratic society.

  1. The February Revolution 1917.

    and can't admit to themselves that they cannot deal with situation and that it is out of their reach. 'Tsarism collapsed at the beginning of 1917 because Nicholas was a weak Tsar who did not listen to his advisors' I think after studying all the sources, that there were other causal factors which forced the Tsar Nicholas to abdicate.

  2. Events leading to the end of the Tsarist Russia and the 1917 Revolution

    By the early 1914, the tsar was quite in control of the country but the outbreak of WW1 destroyed all that. When the Austrian-Hungarian invaded Serbia, the outcry from the public to defend their fellow slavs raised the tsars popularity to unprecedented height and this gave him hope that he could ride the storm that was brewing.

  1. Assess the extent to which the political incompetence of Nicholas II led to the ...

    Russia was in a very difficult and troubled time. Unmet class expectations and perceived social inequality contributed to the peasant's hatred of the Tsar. The peasant world was stirring, the capital more indifferent than ever (Ferro 1991 p 44). Russia's industries were beginning to develop and the number of people living in towns was increasing.

  2. "What caused the Russian people to act in such a radical manner as to ...

    This petition was signed by 135,000 people and asked for both political and economic reforms, such as a Duma which would be elected by the people, freedom of speech, labour legislation, an eight hour working day and the introduction of a new and fair tax system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work