• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there a stalemate at the western front?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was there a stalemate at the western front? The conventional explanation offered by historians for the stalemate on the western front (an area stretching from Belgium all the way down to the Alps) is that by 1914 technology and industrialism had overtaken military strategy and tactics, making them obsolete. Supposedly machine guns and rapid-fire artillery had made the traditional tactics worthless; linear tactics and cavalry charges were things of the past by 1914. This explanation is accurate to a degree; as far as it goes, it explains the situation. I contend, however, that this explanation ignores the crucial factor: leadership. It makes one wonder had the British commanders really been clued up to the art of modern warfare or maybe even taken a lesson in sanity maybe the war might not have been so disastrous in terms of casulaties. ...read more.

Middle

violated the most. On the first day of the Battle of the Somme 60,000 British soldiers died due mostly to ignorance but also to the fact that the commanders tended to attack the most strongly defended positions (which were supposed to have been destroyed by a barrage of artillery lasting a week), destroyed by shelling or not , this is ludicrous. The British seemed to have, not only an enormous amount of faith in their own ability but also the skill of hugely underestimating the enemy`s. The passage above does not seem to me so obviously to me the writings of a genius who has succinctly analyzed the very soul of warfare, creating on his journey tactics that would baffle the most intelligent of men rather a man with a keen eye for common sense (something the commanders lacked). ...read more.

Conclusion

Some may say that the lack of aerial reconaissance, the fact that Germany was prepared (through their own aerial reconaissance) or the ineffectiveness of the shelling to take out enemy forifications , troops and guns ( i dont think it was their place to use such an untested weapon and to place it on the lives of thousands of men when the soldiers were so inexperienced in using such a device) resulted in the poor performance of the generals but ultimately i think it comes down to a lack of respect for human life (to the extent that it can be held without putting oneself at a disadvantage in warfare) and the general insularity of the generals with regards to the recent advances in the technique of warfare, preferring to relive the glory in battle of the Napoleonic era. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

    However, entrenching left the diggers exposed above ground and hence could only be carried out when free of observation such as in a rear area or at night. Sapping involved extending the trench by digging away at the end face.

  2. The Western Front

    Western Front on the river Somme in N France was the Battle of the Somme 1 July-18 Nov 1916. The object of this joint French and British advance, planned by the Marshal of France, Joseph Joffre, and UK commander in chief Douglas Haig, was to drive the Germans north toward

  1. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    However, it is not often that historians can see such re-enactments, and may therefore help to give a better understanding of the conditions the soldiers lived in and their corresponding opinions. Furthermore, this re-enactment is likely to be based on reasonably accurate information regarding these conditions and opinions, as the writer's (Ben Elton)

  2. Was there much change in the fighting methods employed by the British Army on ...

    Only 500, 000 rounds were there to support the offensive at Loos, which is only one round in 16 minutes for heavy guns and one round in 10 minutes for field guns each day. Haig was then forced to resort to untried gas weapons, and even when shells were available

  1. Why had the Western Front been established by the end of 1914?

    Germany could see that Britain had an excellent navy. They believed that until they could rival this they would not be able to enlarge their empire. Eventually Germany created a big naval force that could rival any other in the world.

  2. Why had the Western Front been established by the end of 1914?

    It was designed and planned for use in the event of war between France and Russia, and the main purpose of it was to prevent Germany having to fight a war on two fronts, by rapidly taking control over Paris, the French capital.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the Western Front in the years 1915-1917.

    The mud filled up the soldiers' boots and socks. They found it very hard to survive in these conditions. The food the soldiers ate was repetitive; it was boring and not very nice. They didn't get hot food very often. They ate bully beef, hard biscuits, bread, margarine and jam.

  2. Trench Warfare between 1914-17

    The French and their allies did not want position to be permanent and they built less defensive trenches and also a favoured tactic was to bombard the opposing lines for several days before an attack was due to start, with the aim of destroying the enemy's moral.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work