• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there a stalemate at the western front?

Extracts from this document...


Why was there a stalemate at the western front? The conventional explanation offered by historians for the stalemate on the western front (an area stretching from Belgium all the way down to the Alps) is that by 1914 technology and industrialism had overtaken military strategy and tactics, making them obsolete. Supposedly machine guns and rapid-fire artillery had made the traditional tactics worthless; linear tactics and cavalry charges were things of the past by 1914. This explanation is accurate to a degree; as far as it goes, it explains the situation. I contend, however, that this explanation ignores the crucial factor: leadership. It makes one wonder had the British commanders really been clued up to the art of modern warfare or maybe even taken a lesson in sanity maybe the war might not have been so disastrous in terms of casulaties. ...read more.


violated the most. On the first day of the Battle of the Somme 60,000 British soldiers died due mostly to ignorance but also to the fact that the commanders tended to attack the most strongly defended positions (which were supposed to have been destroyed by a barrage of artillery lasting a week), destroyed by shelling or not , this is ludicrous. The British seemed to have, not only an enormous amount of faith in their own ability but also the skill of hugely underestimating the enemy`s. The passage above does not seem to me so obviously to me the writings of a genius who has succinctly analyzed the very soul of warfare, creating on his journey tactics that would baffle the most intelligent of men rather a man with a keen eye for common sense (something the commanders lacked). ...read more.


Some may say that the lack of aerial reconaissance, the fact that Germany was prepared (through their own aerial reconaissance) or the ineffectiveness of the shelling to take out enemy forifications , troops and guns ( i dont think it was their place to use such an untested weapon and to place it on the lives of thousands of men when the soldiers were so inexperienced in using such a device) resulted in the poor performance of the generals but ultimately i think it comes down to a lack of respect for human life (to the extent that it can be held without putting oneself at a disadvantage in warfare) and the general insularity of the generals with regards to the recent advances in the technique of warfare, preferring to relive the glory in battle of the Napoleonic era. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Trench Warfare between 1914-17

    The Germans usually placed themselves above their opponents so that they would have to accept less advantaged ground. The Chalk soil enabled them to prepare strongly constructed trench systems virtually indestructible dugouts formed an essential features. Often the trenches would be dug on sand or clay.

  2. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

    The diggers were not exposed but only one or two men could work on the trench at a time. Tunnelling was like sapping except that a "roof" of soil was left in place while the trench line was established then removed when the trench was ready to be occupied.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the Western Front in the years 1915-1917.

    The French and the British troops together drove the Germans across the River Aisne. Both the Allied and the German war plan had failed. At the Battle of Ypres thousands of soldiers died. Both sides dug trenches to protect themselves and to stop the other side from advancing.

  2. Was there much change in the fighting methods employed by the British Army on ...

    In 1917, a fuse called 'No. 106' was developed, which was an extremely sensitive fuse that could detonate shells on immediate contact with wire or ground, therefore reducing the amount of cratering that occurred, and increasing the amount of wire that was cut. The British Army entered the war with basically no practical hand grenade or

  1. The Western Front

    The French 6th Army under General Joseph Gallieni moved against the exposed flank of General Alexander von Kluck's 1st German Army, which halted its south drive and turned aside to deal with Gallieni. This opened a 48-km gap between the 1st German Army and the 2nd Army under Field Marshal Karl von Buelow.

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    factual in regard to quality of ammunition state of the barbed wire. This second half of the source is therefore shown to be almost a complete lie, which renders the source to be very unreliable. He states "the barbed wire has never been so well cut, nor the artillery preparation

  1. Why had the Western Front been established by the end of 1914?

    Both countries were constantly trying to build the best ships and have the larger navy. Germany was building up itself up an awful lot thus becoming a threat to other countries. I think the intense rivalry meant that countries were constantly building up their arms making the situation far worse.

  2. Was Field Marshall Douglas Haig more important that the allied blockade of German naval ...

    It started with the typical huge bombardment and gas attacks. However, instead of the usual ?wave? of infantry, he followed up with attacks by smaller bands of specially trained and lightly equipped ?storm troops? who struck during a heavy fog along the entire front line.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work