• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there a stalemate at the western front?

Extracts from this document...


Why was there a stalemate at the western front? The conventional explanation offered by historians for the stalemate on the western front (an area stretching from Belgium all the way down to the Alps) is that by 1914 technology and industrialism had overtaken military strategy and tactics, making them obsolete. Supposedly machine guns and rapid-fire artillery had made the traditional tactics worthless; linear tactics and cavalry charges were things of the past by 1914. This explanation is accurate to a degree; as far as it goes, it explains the situation. I contend, however, that this explanation ignores the crucial factor: leadership. It makes one wonder had the British commanders really been clued up to the art of modern warfare or maybe even taken a lesson in sanity maybe the war might not have been so disastrous in terms of casualties. ...read more.


violated the most. On the first day of the Battle of the Somme 60,000 British soldiers died due mostly to ignorance but also to the fact that the commanders tended to attack the most strongly defended positions (which were supposed to have been destroyed by a barrage of artillery lasting a week), destroyed by shelling or not , this is ludicrous. The British seemed to have, not only an enormous amount of faith in their own ability but also the skill of hugely underestimating the enemy's. The passage above does not seem to me so obviously to me the writings of a genius who has succinctly analysed the very soul of warfare, creating on his journey tactics that would baffle the most intelligent of men rather a man with a keen eye for common sense (something the commanders lacked). ...read more.


Some may say that the lack of aerial reconnaissance, the fact that Germany was prepared (through their own aerial reconnaissance) or the ineffectiveness of the shelling to take out enemy fortifications , troops and guns ( i don't think it was their place to use such an untested weapon and to place it on the lives of thousands of men when the soldiers were so inexperienced in using such a device) resulted in the poor performance of the generals but ultimately i think it comes down to a lack of respect for human life (to the extent that it can be held without putting oneself at a disadvantage in warfare) and the general insularity of the generals with regards to the recent advances in the technique of warfare, preferring to relive the glory in battle of the Napoleonic era. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

    However, entrenching left the diggers exposed above ground and hence could only be carried out when free of observation such as in a rear area or at night. Sapping involved extending the trench by digging away at the end face.

  2. The Western Front

    The battle is also notable as the first in which tanks were used. Toward the end of the Somme offensive, 24 October, the French launched another attack on German positions at Verdun. The Germans were taken by surprise, and from Fleury to Fort Douaumont positions that had taken the Germans months to win were recovered in a few hours.

  1. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    Due to the fact that they are accurate, show that the source has some historical value. However, the third quote disagrees with the previous, as it is extremely pessimistic and displays an undignified attitude towards Haig, which could possibly represent the variation in opinions and attitudes between each individual soldier.

  2. Was there much change in the fighting methods employed by the British Army on ...

    there was prevalence of shrapnel, which was which was designed to wipe out troops that were in the open rather than being effective against trenches. However, by 1916 the situation had changed drastically and at the Battle of the Somme the 3rd army alone was allocated 3 million rounds.

  1. Why had the Western Front been established by the end of 1914?

    Each country was striving to increase their empire. This was to such an extent that between 1870 and 1914 the European powers arms spending increased by a massive 300%. This great acceleration in military spending made countries keep an eye out on the arms in other countries. If one country had better arms then another would try to better them.

  2. Why had the Western Front been established by the end of 1914?

    After the outbreak of war, I feel that the creation and eventual failure of the Schlieffen Plan was the next major reason why the Western Front had been established. German Chief of Staff, General Schlieffen, drew up the Schlieffen Plan in 1905.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the Western Front in the years 1915-1917.

    The general conditions that the soldiers faced was that it was very cold. No Man's Land was very muddy. There was a sea of mud there. Soldiers even drowned in it. They could not change for about a week. The mud filled up the soldiers' boots and socks.

  2. Trench Warfare between 1914-17

    Traverses built at regular intervals in the trenches prevented enfilading fire. The troops also constructed support and communication trenches, they scattered barbered wire, varying in size from 90 to 2,400 feet, onto the no man's land around their trenches. Trench Warfare between 1914-17 The German's defensive work on the Western Front was always more sophisticated than those of the Allies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work