• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there a stalemate at the western front?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why was there a stalemate at the western front? The conventional explanation offered by historians for the stalemate on the western front (an area stretching from Belgium all the way down to the Alps) is that by 1914 technology and industrialism had overtaken military strategy and tactics, making them obsolete. Supposedly machine guns and rapid-fire artillery had made the traditional tactics worthless; linear tactics and cavalry charges were things of the past by 1914. This explanation is accurate to a degree; as far as it goes, it explains the situation. I contend, however, that this explanation ignores the crucial factor: leadership. It makes one wonder had the British commanders really been clued up to the art of modern warfare or maybe even taken a lesson in sanity maybe the war might not have been so disastrous in terms of casualties. ...read more.

Middle

violated the most. On the first day of the Battle of the Somme 60,000 British soldiers died due mostly to ignorance but also to the fact that the commanders tended to attack the most strongly defended positions (which were supposed to have been destroyed by a barrage of artillery lasting a week), destroyed by shelling or not , this is ludicrous. The British seemed to have, not only an enormous amount of faith in their own ability but also the skill of hugely underestimating the enemy's. The passage above does not seem to me so obviously to me the writings of a genius who has succinctly analysed the very soul of warfare, creating on his journey tactics that would baffle the most intelligent of men rather a man with a keen eye for common sense (something the commanders lacked). ...read more.

Conclusion

Some may say that the lack of aerial reconnaissance, the fact that Germany was prepared (through their own aerial reconnaissance) or the ineffectiveness of the shelling to take out enemy fortifications , troops and guns ( i don't think it was their place to use such an untested weapon and to place it on the lives of thousands of men when the soldiers were so inexperienced in using such a device) resulted in the poor performance of the generals but ultimately i think it comes down to a lack of respect for human life (to the extent that it can be held without putting oneself at a disadvantage in warfare) and the general insularity of the generals with regards to the recent advances in the technique of warfare, preferring to relive the glory in battle of the Napoleonic era. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Trench Warfare between 1914-17

    They also established their positions with great deliberateness and efficiency, because they were determined to stay in them; there was to be no further retreat. Since the decision was theirs as to where they should entrench, they had first choice of terrain, and chose well in most cases.

  2. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

    There were three standard ways to dig a trench: entrenching, sapping and tunnelling. Entrenching, where a man would stand on the surface and dig downwards, was most efficient as it allowed a digging party to dig the length of the trench simultaneously.

  1. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the Western Front in the years 1915-1917.

    This plan of theirs was to knock France out the war in a few weeks before turning to fight against Russia as Germany feared war on two fronts, Eastern and Western. The Germans believed the Russians would take a few weeks to get ready and so they would knock out France first.

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    the total extremity of the deaths not being wholly understood by each individual soldier and officer. Although this source seems to be extremely unreliable, Haig may not have been completely responsible for the misinformation. He wasn't actually there; meaning source B is a secondary source, less reliable than a primary source.

  1. Was there much change in the fighting methods employed by the British Army on ...

    there was prevalence of shrapnel, which was which was designed to wipe out troops that were in the open rather than being effective against trenches. However, by 1916 the situation had changed drastically and at the Battle of the Somme the 3rd army alone was allocated 3 million rounds.

  2. The Western Front

    The American president, Woodrow Wilson, tried to negotiate between the two sides and received a fairly positive response from the Allies. On 13 Jan 1917 the German government announced that all sea traffic within certain areas close to Britain,

  1. Why had the Western Front been established by the end of 1914?

    Each country was striving to increase their empire. This was to such an extent that between 1870 and 1914 the European powers arms spending increased by a massive 300%. This great acceleration in military spending made countries keep an eye out on the arms in other countries. If one country had better arms then another would try to better them.

  2. Why had the Western Front been established by the end of 1914?

    After the outbreak of war, I feel that the creation and eventual failure of the Schlieffen Plan was the next major reason why the Western Front had been established. German Chief of Staff, General Schlieffen, drew up the Schlieffen Plan in 1905.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work