• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

Why were major cities of Britain bombed by the Germans in 1940-41?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment One Question - 1 Why were major cities of Britain bombed by the Germans in 1940-41? Germany and Britain fought a battle from August to September called Battle of Britain. This fight was for control over skies. There were four major battles in battle of Britain in which Britain won. After being defeated by Britain, Germans knew that they would not be able to invade Britain, so they began to attack it in different ways and adopted new tactics. They knew that if they carry their troops and tanks on ships R.A.F (Royal Air Force) of Britain would destroy them and sink their ships. So, they decided to destroy R.A.F first. They not only planned to destroy R.A.F but also Britain's economy and its war effort by destroying its factories. Factories were the main economy of Britain so for destroying its economy, they bombed them. They also knew that Britain would do its level best to keep them away from their colonies so as to maintain their empire. So Germany tried to frighten Britain and desperately changed their tactics to create fear and panic among people. They attacked the docks in London so as to stop supplies of food being brought into Britain. They started bombing its main towns and cities. The most affected towns by German bombing were Coventry, Glasgow, and East end. In all, Germans killed over 60,000 people due to air raids and they destroyed over 250,000 houses, so that people loose their morale and hope and government surrender itself in front of German dictatorship. Question-2 Describe the effects of the blitz on everyday life in Britain? Germany started invading Britain in September 1940. German bombers flew over Britain at nighttime and threw high explosives on it. Instead of doing precision bombing in which only main centers are targeted they commenced carpet bombing killing thousands of innocent's people. During war, whole of Britain was facing a massive loss and destruction due to heavy bombing by Germany. ...read more.

Middle

Source D is a primary source because it has been taken in 1940. It mainly supports the evidence of Source B because it shows damage done to civilian morale and distress to ordinary people. It also mostly supports B because it was censored for a time. Even though it is not as shocking as Source B it still had the potential to reduce morale. This is shown in Source D where I think it shows a man looting somebody else possessions and another man pointing at him accusing him of doing so. Regardless of the fact whether this man is genuine or not, Source D still shows damage and devastation as a result of bombing. Sources B and C do support this but the extent of the damage is much worse in Source D and Source B as people are not prepared to stand around and smile after their houses and possessions after they had been wrecked. All the Sources tell us different things about the air raids. Source C shows morale was high at the beginning of the Blitz but after two months we can see in Source D that the bombing was continuing and Source B shows us that the bombing went on for a long time, over three years, not just months as many people at the time had thought. I think that Source C does not really support Source D as Source C is a pose photograph and was released as propaganda to keep up morale. I think Sources B and D show reality and what was really going on at the time I think that is why they were censored because the photographs would show the destruction that the government had would want to conceal from the public eye as it could destroy the cooperation of the British people. Sources D and B are different though because they show damage done to different kinds of people being affected but as a hole this shows us that anybody could be affected by the Blitz. ...read more.

Conclusion

Where people's homes had been damaged and other people went and took their stuff which is shown in Source D. This shows that some people took advantage of other peoples unfortunate situations and that some people were committing very selfish acts. A reason to suggest that the statement in itself is a myth is that many people were willing to accept evacuees and many of those were treated well and that the true state of the children from the inner cities became widely known. But children were not always well treated and some families just accepted children because they needed the money which was to be given by the government. This is a serious case of children being ill treated and I can guarantee that there was more like it. This shows that people used evacuation as a chance to gain extra money but that wasn't always the case and that some people may have enjoyed helping others out. Another cause to suggest that the statement is false is that people made do because they knew there was little alternative. There was no major civil disturbances, people were not rioting or demonstrating this suggests that people endured the hardships of the war because they knew that some good would come out of it at the end of the war. Another reason to suggest that these people were brave and united is that there were a lot of volunteer groups. These people were not paid they just genuinely wanted to help others. There were people who joined the ARP, they made sure that people were safe at night and made sure that people obeyed the blackout regulations. There were The AFS, The Auxiliary Fire Service who were volunteers who supported the Fire Service. These people risked there lives to help and save others. So, Overall I cannot properly say that whether I agree with the statement or not because people did carry on with their lives and were brave and united but there were also cases of people being self-centred and not caring about how their actions will affect others. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extend do you agree with Rhodes view that the British Empire was ...

    5 star(s)

    the resent rise in revenue was due to the cheap native labor from the colonies. Cp hill wanted people to understand that only rich and powerful Englishmen /women benefited from the Empire. Cp hill interpretation is more valued then that of Cecil Rhode's as cp hill is a historian which

  2. Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain(TM)s major cities in ...

    Although these are all important reasons that link up with each other, I think that the most important cause of why the government decided to evacuate children from Britain's major cities is probably the Government attitudes. Arguably, the government had public reasons for evacuation and private reasons.

  1. Economic decline in Britain

    However unemployment and misery stayed and provoked social divisions. In 1973 Britain entered in the European Economic Community (EEC) which really helped exchanges between countries. Thanks to the Marshal Aid, Britain recovered from the debts from the war. Also Britain took advantage of North Sea Oil, exported it and became self-sufficient in oil helping the economy.

  2. Assimilation. The problem with immigration in Britain was that the people werent coming from ...

    However later waves of immigrants migrated after they gained independence were no longer under British rule. This meant that these immigrants weren't taught English in there country. Instead they used there native language and hence found it hard to talk with English people.

  1. What was the contribution of tanks towards winning the war for Britain?

    It was said: "Tanks changed an active war to a mobile war." So, in conclusion, it is fair to say that tanks were successful in this aspect; they had the ability to cross trenches and break the stalemate which was, of course, a major thing at the time.

  2. Why were the major cities of Britain bombed by Germans in 1940-41?

    With these destroyed, the battle on the front would be weaker due to a lack of equipment. Also bombing these factories would make people jobless and poor, therefore ruining the economy of Britain. Another important target for the Germans were food preparation areas (e.g.

  1. How did Britain remain undefeated from June 1940 to 1943 in World War 2?

    In the last week of August and the first week of September 1940, German attacks intensified, and 103 fighter pilots died and another 128 were seriously injured. At this time, Britain was at breaking point, and then on September 7th, a giant fleet of bombers headed for Britain, but headed for London instead of the airfields.

  2. Comparing three sources describing the German bombing of Britain.

    Finally, representation three?s main purpose was to educate and inform students about the Second World War (since the article was featured within a textbook). Because of its purpose, representation three does not take any sides and remains impartial for the entire duration of the text.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work