• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were some forms of opposition more successful than others in the period 1798-1921?

Extracts from this document...


Why were some forms of opposition more successful than others in the period 1798-1921? The Act of Union, 1801. Ireland was to be joined to Great Britain into a single kingdom, the Dublin parliament was to be abolished. Ireland was to be represented at Westminster (all were Anglicans), the Anglican Church was to be recognised as the official Church of Ireland, no Catholics were to be allowed to hold public office and there was to be no Catholic Emancipation. Immediately we can see from this that any form of opposition would be to destroy this act. Fundamentally it destroyed all catholic rights and forced them to renounce their Catholic faith and take on a Protestant one. In Ireland Daniel O'Connell developed a reputation for his radical political views. By the early 1920's the Irish people started to listen to O'Connell's views and he gathered a large group of supporters. O'Connell had many aims in his political career. O'Connell's goal was to repeal against the act of union. When the Act of Union was passed in 1801 it did not help the Irish. It simply brought problems and distrust to the Irish people. O'Connell organised a meeting to discuss the repeal of the Act of Union, three quarters of a million Irish turned up. They were known as 'Monster Meetings'. We can see that O'Connell successfully created an Irish nation movement and completely changed the British view of the Irish. ...read more.


The Third Home Rule Bill seemed to confirm to Nationalists that Ireland's day had come; unlike the first two bills, it was a well thought out piece of legislation. Parnell had achieved what O' Connell or any Republican movement before him i.e. Fenians and Young Ireland had dreamed of. Parnell had got the home rule through Parliament however it was to be rejected by the House of Lords. Parnell had came to his peak he had achieved so much for the nationalist cause through the British parliamentary procedure however 1889 Parnell was found to having an affair with Kitty O Shea Gladstone and the Catholic church both condemn him, which ended his career he later dies in 1891. Therefore, we can see from this that constitutional nationalism was fairly successful in achieving it aims, by working through the system the opposition had nearly got what it wanted, but due to the nature of politics, the affair with a married woman spelt the end of his opposition. Concerning the revolutionary nationalism, the most famous attempt was the Easter Uprising. It was a failure. It lacked the support of the general public and was defeated by the British military. At the time of the Uprising, there was greater support for Constitutional Nationalism, which supported Home Rule. Both Connolly and Pearse understood that the Uprising would fail but they hoped that their efforts would open the doors to freedom and unify the nationalist movement. ...read more.


The power of the local priests was great and their influence within a local community, and especially among the older members of such communities, meant that they could undermine whatever influence the Fenians or any other form of opposition tried to establish. Thus we can see that if opposition were to be successful then it would need the support of the church due to it's powerful grip over the people's lives. Thus the general opposition to union did not have this support and so it ultimately failed In conclusion we can see that constitutional nationalism was more effective than revolutionary nationalism, however there were some forms of successful revolutionary nationalism, though not successful in the conventional terms perhaps. For example Michael Collins. Like all legends, he was captured in the cruellest yet effective way possible. Collins achievements were many: he helped fight the British to a stalemate by changing the rules of warfare and setting up an intelligence network to rival the Empire's. He helped negotiate a treaty, which gave Ireland the first stepping stone to become a Republic, and oversaw Ireland's turbulent transition to democracy. His achievements were, however, not without a price. He precipitated the bloody War of Independence against the British and the treaty deal brought back from London split the country into two fiercely opposing halves and plunged the country into the throes of a traumatic civil war. Thus ultimately opposition needed to be well organised and have enough support to succeed, constitutional nationalism had this through its methods of working through the system. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. Development of Irish Nationalism 1798-1921

    The Fenians were always a minority in the national movement, and their actions tended to arouse hostility rather than admiration in Ireland. However, their atrocities in the 60's motivated men like Gladstone into a program of reform for Ireland. This was perhaps their most surprising and unintended legacy.

  2. How far do these sources support the veiw that Irish Nationalism was a 'curious ...

    support of the catholic masses which no previous revolutionary group had recieved. The popular blend had changed from political radicalism to political revolution, shown in the 1918 election results. Source 7 shows that by 1921 the blend is still not fixed, its fluid and illustrates that the blend had changed.

  1. Why is Daniel O'connell considered to be a great nationalist leader?

    O'Connell was hugely successful in drumming up support from the masses, with the Catholic peasantry often turning up in hoardes to support. Again O'Connell relied on support from the Catholic Church, and many bishops openly came out in praise of the movement.

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    However, after 1845, they effectively gained limited support under Mitchel and Lalor due to the Famine and because according to Hoppen, for Lalor, "the people" were essentially the farmers. However, Hoppen argues that they were "practically ineffective" and "an ideal" whose ideas of a Commonwealth came too early.

  1. How Effectively did Irish Catholic and Nationalist Leaders advance their Cause in the years ...

    This necessitated a by-election and O'Connell decided to stand, which wasn't illegal despite the bar on Catholics taking up a seat. Not surprisingly, as he had guaranteed the vote of the members of the Catholic Association, he won, and this created a crisis.

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    He never proved successful. A `tithe war' broke out in the 1830's, which created unrest in the Irish peasantry on refusal of paying Tithes to the Anglican Church, which they did not belong. Another reason O' Connell never gave in any detail what would replace the union, which lead to

  1. Parnell and the Irish Question Why did Gladstone fail to pacify Ireland?

    although this did not mean that the Irish were any better off; the tithes still had to be paid but were now paid to the state rather than the Irish Church. Despite the fact that the Act 'solved once and for all the major religious grievance of the Irish Roman

  2. How far do the sources support the view that Irish Nationalism was an 'increasingly ...

    Thus, sources two and three as well as source one, support the view that Irish nationalism was an 'increasingly complicated...tree'. However, sources two and three are two very individual viewpoints. The study of further historical viewpoints, like Lyons' for example, would be very useful to created a more balanced view.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work