• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were the Bolsheviks able to seize power in Petrograd in 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why were the Bolsheviks able to seize power in Petrograd in 1917? There are a number of factors that led to the Bolsheviks being able to seize power in Petrograd. There wasn't one incident that can be attributed to causing the revolution by it's self. To understand how the revolution was able to take place we must understand the structure of Russia's society from the late 1800's until when the revolutions took place in 1917. Before the year 1917 Russia had been an autocracy, this means that one man alone had complete power over the whole of Russia. This man was known as the Tsar. His family, the Romanov's had ruled Russia since the 17th century. He had complete power over all of the people in Russia. To pass a law he did not need to consult any form of parliament, giving him the power to make any decisions he wanted. This made the Tsar a very powerful man. In the late 1800's Russia still hadn't undergone an industrial revolution and was seen as having a 'backward' society by the other powers in Europe. Russia still operated under the feudal system, which had been abolished in countries such as Britain for a few hundred years. Russia was a huge empire but having not undergone an industrial revolution, the majority of its citizens lived in poverty. A small proportion of the population were nobles and they allowed peasants to live on their land and work for them, consequently the peasants had no property of their own and lived in starvation and poverty. ...read more.

Middle

Under enormous pressure the Tsar backed down and gave concessions to the workers starting by setting up a parliament, known as the Duma, which was set up in 1905 and eventually lasted until 1917. Following more strikes by the workers the Tsar is forced to make more concessions, such as the allowance of trade unions and official political parties being set up. Another revolution in the December of 1905 came to nothing and only really succeeded in the setting up of the Duma, which was virtually powerless anyway. Despite elections being held by the Duma the country was still an autocracy, which consequently still meant the Tsar had the power to over rule any decisions made, which is exactly what he did. In the first two elections, the resulting parties proved too extreme so the Tsar dissolved the elections. So the Duma was worthless if the Tsar could just dissolve the elections if he didn't like the result. The Prime Minister at the time was called Stolypin, he suggested that the system was changed so that the people can vote. The result of which means a Conservative Party is voted in. At this time a number of extreme parties were banned by the Tsar and made illegal, this meant that Lenin was again forced to flee the country as the Bolsheviks were included in this. Stolypin then began to make a number of reforms including agricultural and land ownership reforms. ...read more.

Conclusion

In my opinion the two most important factors in allowing the Bolsheviks to seize power are the effects of the First World War and the unpopularity of the provisional government. If either of these did not happen then it is quite possible that there would never have been a revolution by the Bolsheviks. If I had to choose one then it would be the effects of the First World War because this made the working and living conditions worse which made the people force the Tsar to abdicate which gave the provisional government which made the people revolt against it. Also indirectly if there had been no war then perhaps Lenin would not have got back into Russia because the only reason that the Germans helped him get back was because they correctly thought he would create havoc in Russia and thus make Russia to surrender to Germany. But having considered all of the possible factors in allowing the Bolsheviks to power I have to conclude that the factors all pieced together in one big chain. Without one of the factors it may not have happened. However I believe that it was inevitable that a revolution would take place, it was just a matter of who would seize the chance, which is what the Bolsheviks did. They did not need to use hardly any force to take over the city, nor was there a great number of Bolshevik supporters in Russia, they were just the ones that acted most swiftly, under the expert guidance of Lenin. Sam Tiernan 11SM ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    Towns Association.This was later regarded as the General Board of Health . Smith was the first to gain in in-depth insight into medical matters and to analyse infectious diseases , such as cholera and yellow fever , to begin with .

  2. Why does the Tsar abdicate in 1917?

    While Pipes, argues that it was the rural attitudes that were circling the factories due to an influx of peasants into the workforce and political awareness was driving them to point out the flaws in the regime, other liberals, point out the famous phrase- "Revolutions start in bread queues".

  1. History Force essay. A specific individual and group, Lenin and the Bolsheviks ...

    Their military consisted of the Red Army, which was controlled by Trotsky, and was made up of 20,000 men. The Red Army seized the main points in Petrograd including the government buildings, the central railway station, the central post office and the central bank.

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    A Socialist priest how was head of the workers union asked the Tsar to come out and speak to the nation at his winter place "Do not believe the ministers, they are cheating thee in regard to real state of affairs.

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    land, and for the famines, and they didn't like the Tsarina, because they thought she was a German spy. However, many other people did like the tsarina, and I think that's why they explicitly said that the tsarina and her son have been sent off to a safe place.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    of an 'inspiring leader' who is 'strong, beautiful, wise and marvelous', source F describes Stalin as 'a narrow minded, malicious man', he even goes so far as to say Stalin is 'not a man, but a devil'. The sources are similar in that they both take their views to the extreme.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    this story to try and illustrate that the lack of concern these men had was down to "our" government policies, "It seems to me that the lack of concern our leaders show towards the people is the same attitude I met in far-off Siberia".

  2. Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

    This highlights that Lenin was very prepared since he was ensuring that no one would abandon the plan; and they would have to put maximum effort into the revolution. Additionally, on October 10th, a meeting was held in which he tried to persuade twelve party leaders that a revolution was necessary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work