• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were the opponents of the Tzars from 1855 ultimately more successful than those who opposed the Communists regime after 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Why were the opponents of the Tzars from 1855 ultimately more successful than those who opposed the Communists regime after 1917? The Tzarist Empire fell when Tzar Nicholas II was forced to abdicate in 1917 by Tzarist opposition where as the Communists were not forced by opposition but freely chose to end communism under Gorbachev in 1989. This suggests the question is true that ultimately opponents of the Tzar were more successful as they put an end to Tzarist rule where as opponents of the Communists failed to end Communism. The only times there was actually successful opposition was in February and October 1917 with the before mentioned abdication of Tzar Nicholas II and a successful revolution by Lenin and the Communists. However there was also limited success in times with the 1905 revolution, Kronstadt, civil war, early stages of collectivisation and Khrushchev's succession. To answer this question there are two areas to investigate including the threat of the opposition and the regimes in relation to the opposition. Firstly this paragraph will be discussing the nature and threat of opposition under Tzarist rule. Under Alexander II the new openness encouraged by reforms meant opposition grew in the form of writers and students wanting radical demands for a constitution which the Tzar was unable to meet. With the newly allowed freedom by the censors writers began to discuss further reforms and that the Tzar was contributing to the backwardness of Russia. ...read more.


In terms of opposition to the Tzar the sheer support is large however as the opposition was entirely peaceful it is of a different nature and less of a threat to the Tzar; especially in a country where only violence seems to change political direction. The Tzar in relation to the opposition was very extreme with 200 killed, this with out a doubt showing why opposition wasn't successful because it was so fiercely destroyed. The less threatening Bloody Sunday led to more extreme opposition and the visions of Bloody Sunday caused mass peasant revolts and even the Tzar's uncle Grand Duke Sergei was assassinated this made the Tzar so anxious he published the October Manifesto which granted freedom of speech, meeting and association. This wasn't enough to satisfy the peasants and a Union of Peasants was set up and finally a mutiny on the battleship 'Potemkin' which sparked mutiny in the whole armed forces. By mid October the whole of Russia was paralyzed by strike, this meant that all of the Tzar's opponents were now united. This now meant the Tzar was forced to accept cabinet government and appointed Russia's first Prime Minister Count Witte. This opposition was quite fierce as it was supported by vast numbers of the population and completed halted the Russian economy. This forced Tzar Nicholas II to distribute some of his power in the form of appointing a Prime Minister which he would not have done that lightly. ...read more.


This opposition of no particular group just generally the whole country was extremely successful opposition as it caused the overthrow of 300 years of Romanov rule. This was more successful than the opposition of communism because of the far less threat of fear compared to the degree under communism. In conclusion, I think that yes the opponents of the Tzars from 1855 were ultimately more successful than those who opposed the Communists regime after 1917. This was because firstly there was a greater threat to the Tzarist regime between 1855-1917 with the poor standard of living and famine which was more extreme in Tzarist time. This led to circumstances resulting in opposition such as the 1905 revolution and the forced abdication of the Tzar because of the failing war and lack of reforms. In terms of the Tzarist regime in relation to the opposition they brutally put down opposition but not to the same extend as the Communists who used more fear tactics to scare opposition. Furthermore with the cult of personality especially of Stalin, opposition was less likely to arise as people believed Stalin to be even like a god figure and with clever use of propaganda that the Communists made better use of to keep their support high and opposition low. However I think the key factor why the opponents of the Tzars from 1855 were ultimately more successful than those who opposed the Communists regime after 1917 were the extreme measures that would happen to Communist opposition no matter what scale such as certain death! ?? ?? ?? ?? Nick Williams ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    This is illustrated well by source F, it reads '...The attitude of the countryside to the war has, right from the outset, been extremely unfavourable...Now in the country there is no belief that the war will be successful'. Source E also illustrates the food shortages and terrible conditions during the war.

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    The people would of supported him but fortunately for Lenin he could use Tsar Nicholas's faults to help him understand what the Russian public wanted and he was able to persuade them to start supporting the Bolsheviks Party. 2) Using some of the causes in the list explain how both

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    However, Nicholas had left St. Petersburg at the first signs of trouble. The people were met by soldiers and mounted Cossacks. Without warning they opened fire and charged. It was a decisive day and a key factor demonstrating how Tsarist Russia began to 'break at the seams.'

  2. Why did Tzar Nicholas II abdicate in 1917 and not in 1905?

    Ultimately he was able to control the revolution in 1905 and his position wasn't threatened. But in 19 17 Russia was losing the First World War. This was much worse than any war they had previously been in, Russia's land and was being threatened and the Russian population was forced to move.

  1. Assess the strengths & weakness of Russia around 1855

    Not to mention this caused famine nearly all the time in Russia this mixed with traditional agricultural methods resulted in there always an area in Russia where people were dieing of starvation, this is a major weakness to Russia society.

  2. 'Only Alexander II's policies made significant progress in avoiding revolution in Russia.' How valid ...

    instead of being a way of controlling the peasants as it had been prior to the Crimean War, would have been far more likely to incite disorder. It seems with the momentum for change after the failure in the Crimean War, for the new tsar to simply do nothing would

  1. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    Therefore I think that these sources could be used by a historian to study Bloody Sunday and provide them with some very useful pieces of information. f) How far do these sources support the view that 'Bloody Sunday' was caused by poor living and working conditions in St.Petersburg?

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    Question 2: Why did Stalin make these changes (6) Stalin gave a fairly famous speech about the need to modernise Russia, which had an extract that went: "We (Russia) are a hundred years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this lag in ten years.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work