• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were the opponents of the Tzars from 1855 ultimately more successful than those who opposed the Communists regime after 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Why were the opponents of the Tzars from 1855 ultimately more successful than those who opposed the Communists regime after 1917? The Tzarist Empire fell when Tzar Nicholas II was forced to abdicate in 1917 by Tzarist opposition where as the Communists were not forced by opposition but freely chose to end communism under Gorbachev in 1989. This suggests the question is true that ultimately opponents of the Tzar were more successful as they put an end to Tzarist rule where as opponents of the Communists failed to end Communism. The only times there was actually successful opposition was in February and October 1917 with the before mentioned abdication of Tzar Nicholas II and a successful revolution by Lenin and the Communists. However there was also limited success in times with the 1905 revolution, Kronstadt, civil war, early stages of collectivisation and Khrushchev's succession. To answer this question there are two areas to investigate including the threat of the opposition and the regimes in relation to the opposition. Firstly this paragraph will be discussing the nature and threat of opposition under Tzarist rule. Under Alexander II the new openness encouraged by reforms meant opposition grew in the form of writers and students wanting radical demands for a constitution which the Tzar was unable to meet. With the newly allowed freedom by the censors writers began to discuss further reforms and that the Tzar was contributing to the backwardness of Russia. ...read more.


In terms of opposition to the Tzar the sheer support is large however as the opposition was entirely peaceful it is of a different nature and less of a threat to the Tzar; especially in a country where only violence seems to change political direction. The Tzar in relation to the opposition was very extreme with 200 killed, this with out a doubt showing why opposition wasn't successful because it was so fiercely destroyed. The less threatening Bloody Sunday led to more extreme opposition and the visions of Bloody Sunday caused mass peasant revolts and even the Tzar's uncle Grand Duke Sergei was assassinated this made the Tzar so anxious he published the October Manifesto which granted freedom of speech, meeting and association. This wasn't enough to satisfy the peasants and a Union of Peasants was set up and finally a mutiny on the battleship 'Potemkin' which sparked mutiny in the whole armed forces. By mid October the whole of Russia was paralyzed by strike, this meant that all of the Tzar's opponents were now united. This now meant the Tzar was forced to accept cabinet government and appointed Russia's first Prime Minister Count Witte. This opposition was quite fierce as it was supported by vast numbers of the population and completed halted the Russian economy. This forced Tzar Nicholas II to distribute some of his power in the form of appointing a Prime Minister which he would not have done that lightly. ...read more.


This opposition of no particular group just generally the whole country was extremely successful opposition as it caused the overthrow of 300 years of Romanov rule. This was more successful than the opposition of communism because of the far less threat of fear compared to the degree under communism. In conclusion, I think that yes the opponents of the Tzars from 1855 were ultimately more successful than those who opposed the Communists regime after 1917. This was because firstly there was a greater threat to the Tzarist regime between 1855-1917 with the poor standard of living and famine which was more extreme in Tzarist time. This led to circumstances resulting in opposition such as the 1905 revolution and the forced abdication of the Tzar because of the failing war and lack of reforms. In terms of the Tzarist regime in relation to the opposition they brutally put down opposition but not to the same extend as the Communists who used more fear tactics to scare opposition. Furthermore with the cult of personality especially of Stalin, opposition was less likely to arise as people believed Stalin to be even like a god figure and with clever use of propaganda that the Communists made better use of to keep their support high and opposition low. However I think the key factor why the opponents of the Tzars from 1855 were ultimately more successful than those who opposed the Communists regime after 1917 were the extreme measures that would happen to Communist opposition no matter what scale such as certain death! ?? ?? ?? ?? Nick Williams ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    However, general dissatisfaction would not be enough -as the Tsar was still very respected and loved by the general population. Conditions would have to get really bad for the Tsar to be disliked, as he was still widely believed to be appointed by God, and adored by the Russians.

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    Nicholas had total lost control of his country. So in a final attempt to keep Tsarist going on in Russia, He asked his brother, Michael to help. But Michael refused and Nicholas abdicated. Without Nicholas being weak and not wanting to run the country.

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    tons in 1913 to 73.3 million tons in 1928 to 68.4 million tons in 1933 to 97.4 million tons in 1937 so despite some major setbacks in 1913 and 1928 Russia was better off by 1937. Changes in agriculture and industry were linked in one way.

  2. Assess the strengths & weakness of Russia around 1855

    Not to mention this caused famine nearly all the time in Russia this mixed with traditional agricultural methods resulted in there always an area in Russia where people were dieing of starvation, this is a major weakness to Russia society.

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    The government's attempt to deal with Russia's problems failed dramatically. In 1903 it slightly relaxed its censorship and other oppressive measures. This resulted in an explosion of anti-government pamphlets, articles and books. It also tried to set up government-approved unions (others were illegal)

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    At the same time, Roosevelt's advisers had come up with a series of rules and regulations which would prevent the reckless speculation which contributed to the Wall Street Crash. The immediate action which Franklin D. Roosevelt took astounded most Americans and they began to think that Franklin D.

  1. Why did Tzar Nicholas II abdicate in 1917 and not in 1905?

    Ultimately he was able to control the revolution in 1905 and his position wasn't threatened. But in 19 17 Russia was losing the First World War. This was much worse than any war they had previously been in, Russia's land and was being threatened and the Russian population was forced to move.

  2. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    do the eating' and the workers underneath all of it holding up the hole of the structure. This shows us that the people in the revolutionary groups do not like the Tsar and feel the workers should be shown more respect.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work