• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper

Extracts from this document...


Why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper? Catching a serial killer today is no easy job, but more than 100 years ago it was an even more difficult job. The police then had to face no forensics, little structure within the forces, people unwilling to help, and yet they were still expected to find the ripper. In 1888 there were no forensics, no DNA tests and no fingerprinting. The area in which the murders occurred was an especially abysmal place where people often walked round covered in blood due to the slaughter houses. The technology of the time wouldn't have been able to distinguish between human and animal blood. The lack of forensic tests would also make it difficult to prove conclusively if two or more crimes had been committed by the same person. These limits were partly because of the bungling police work. Normally the police did not investigate cases like this under as much pressure. They only investigated this case because the rich had become concerned over the plight of the poor, as did the press. ...read more.


There was a history of rivalry between the two forces which meant information wasn't shared properly. The forces didn't have structure or good working practice. Of course, the police's job wasn't made any easier by an unhelpful public. They expected the police to catch the Ripper but weren't prepared to help. The people of Whitechapel were so petrified that they looked for scapegoats, grasping onto the Jewish community to blame. The fact that a witness in the Annie Chapman murder pointed towards a foreigner, added to the fact that 'Leather Apron' was Jewish quickly conjured up a very anti-Semitic atmosphere. In addition, every so called witness gave a different description which meant the police were not even able to create an accurate artists impression of possible suspects. This lack of reliable witnesses slowed down the case. The public's unhelpfulness was increased by the press' interference and opinions on the case. The press of the day were sensationalist. Not only did the press publish pictures which fuelled the anti-Jewish feelings within the public, they also wrote their own hoax letters supposedly from the killer. ...read more.


Unless aided by competent experts and supported by law enforcement agencies, many present-day departments cannot be expected to effectively investigate and resolve such murderous incidents should they occur in their field. The Green River Killer case is an example of this. In the reports for it, you see events comparable with those of the Ripper inquiry. Unlike the Ripper hunt, women police officers were used as decoy "customers". However, it was thought too dangerous for the women officers to enter a customer's vehicle in the hope of catching the killer. In the Ripper inquiry, sufficient record keeping, and information management/co-ordination was practically absent; and in the Green River Killer case it was too late in coming. In both investigations, the relationship between the law enforcement agencies and their relationship with the public was not idyllic. In both investigations, police also did not have the right knowledge and resources to accurately measure the situation, grasp its significant factors, and immediately collect an appropriate reaction. Even if the Jack the Ripper, and Green River Killer investigations had possessed the needed means, their investigations could not have lasted the absence of key people, poor public relations, interagency conflict, bad judgments, missed opportunities, or the exclusion of women from highly dangerous police work. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Jack the Ripper questions and answers.

    'Leather Apron' was arrested three days after the murder of Annie Chapman. However, 'Leather Apron', John Pitzer, was released from prison, although he had at least one conviction of stabbing. This was because he had alibis for both murders. During the death of Polly Nicholls, he was at a lodging

  2. why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper?

    This later lead to a lot of confusion because jack the ripper was thought to have been a left handed man. At the time there wasn t a lot of technology around. They had no fingerprinting and DNA testing facilities available.

  1. Why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper?

    This tactic did not work; the man was rewarded with snide comments from his police constables and the local residents in Whitechapel, leading to more public confusion and less trust in the police.

  2. Why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper?

    probably have been lost" he didn't save this evidence, which might have played a big part in the capture of Jake the Ripper, and shows lack of there investigational skills. A letter was sent to the police with a kidney, and Jack the Ripper called it 'From Hell'.

  1. Jack The Ripper - Law and Order in the late 19th century

    For this reason the police wore blue uniform, a similar colour to the Navy, who were national heroes. The primary methods employed by the police were to deter crime and keep order, which involved combating drunkenness and catching criminals 'in the act' while committing crimes.

  2. Why the police were unable to catch Jack the ripper.

    CID had only been set up for 10 years before; they were dealing with things they were unaware about. They were unprepared and inexperienced. The police made little progress in the inquiry with Jack the Ripper; this was because of the lack of clues.

  1. Why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper?

    This suggested that he or she had a job. If he or she was local then someone would have seen them run away or with the victims. Also the informants were not scared of coming forward with evidence, which suggests that the killer was not a local face.

  2. Why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper?

    The police had only been formed in 1819/20 and so had a very limited knowledge of serial killers, and also scientific knowledge. Police were generally there to keep order, not to do detective work. There had probably been other serial killers around, but the police were blind to who they were and what was happening.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work