• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were the police unable to catch Jack The Ripper

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why where the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper? The police were unable to catch Jack the ripper due to a number of key reasons all linking with the limitation of police work at that time. The first reason, was the focus of the police investigation, the police thought the murderer was local and wasted time on just one area. A lot of attention was given to the suspect "leather apron" some newspapers published the leather apron story, this pressurised police to follow up this line of investigation, and this meant time was wasted. The fact that the murderer was not local was based on the evidence that the murderer was not a butcher or an abattoir and could be someone of a higher class like a doctor; the police ignored this evidence and kept focusing on White chapel. All these factors wasted time; it was mainly down to police work, as they only focused on one area when evidence suggested the murderer was not local. ...read more.

Middle

This was not helped as Leather apron was Jewish, this encouraged many in White chapel to turn their suspicion and hostility to the Jewish community. The police increased the number of patrols in the area, the night the two murders were committed, this meant they were carried out quickly, perhaps in 5 minutes, which caused trouble for the police, as there weren't any witnesses, as the murderer didn't linger around the bodies. This suggested the murderer was quick and his work was efficient. The methods the policed used were ineffective and proves hopeless. The methods that they used included undercover work, where police used to dress as prostitutes hoping to trap the murderer, house to house inquiries, more than 2,000 lodgers were interviewed this wasted a lot of time as people could easily lie. Slaughterhouses and abattoirs were investigated where seventy-six butchers were questioned and bloodhounds were used but also proved hopeless. All these method proved hopeless and ineffective, as no further information or evidence was gained, this may have been because the police didn't know what they were doing and were prepared as nothing like this had been experienced before. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion I think all of the factors were equally important in preventing the police from catching the murderer, because they focused on just one area and didn't find any further evidence, they investigated slaughterhouses and abattoirs but found no information, this suggested the murderer was a doctor, but the police didn't do any further investigations which limited the investigation. The police didn't know how to use evidence; they dismissed possible leads but followed other leads with little evidence. They used one witness statement than another even if it had little or no evidence, even though police work became more organised it didn't help catch Jack the ripper, methods which could have caught Jack the ripper such as finger printing was developed in 1901, so it was slow to develop. Detective work did become more organised however methods weren't advanced enough until 1901, so detective work couldn't be carried out to its full potential. All these factors limited police work, detective work would have been more effective if methods were developed faster, and evidence wasn't handled well. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper?

    The police had only just come to understand the importance of footprints and handwriting which was available at the time. The police were considered incompetent, after the first murder had taken place the police had washed away the blood, the footprints, and had moved the body from it s original position.

  2. Why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper?

    After the murder of Polly Nicholls, a character called the "Leather Apron" appeared in many stories; this character had a reputation of threatening prostitutes for money. This story was another case followed by the police, another mistake. The Star, newspaper, described "Leather Apron" saying he was a Jewish slipper maker.

  1. Jack the Ripper Coursework

    She didn't say where she was going but that night she was seen several times in Berner Street. At about 12:30, only half an hour before her body was found in the entry to Dutfield's Yard, PC William Smith saw her talking to a man in the street close by.

  2. Source based discussion on Jack The Rippe.

    The report clearly shows that no one that isn't disturbed could do something so brutal and violent. It also gives a clear description of the 'extraordinary violence' that source A describes. Source C also supports source A as it also clearly depicts the 'meaningless cuts' that source B states.

  1. Why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper

    There was more than one police force operating in London at the time, which meant that there was a lack of communication. In fact, the superior officers told their subordinates to not reveal any evidence they retrieved to their rival force, each police force wanting the glory of catching the Whitechapel murderer.

  2. Why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper?

    It was Dr George Phillips who was on the scene of the murder. Her throat had been savagely cut and her body had been viciously mutilated. Organs removed from her abdomen in a manner, which suggested that her attacker had anatomical knowledge.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work