• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were there Two Revolutions in 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Why were there Two Revolutions in 1917? Russian revolution in 1917 resulted in the collapse of centuries of Tsarism and the establishment of the world's first communist state. There were said to be two revolutions in that year, the first one being in February, which was spontaneous and largely unorganised by the provisional committee. The other revolution being in October which in contrast to the February revolution, was well organised and masterly executed coup d'etat by a party who had skilfully aligned itself with the demands of the worker and peasants. With Russia going into war, may have been a factor, which helped cause the February revolution. An example of this was the economic effects, the acute food shortages. This led to people joining in the full-scale strike called Putilov Steel as they heard rumours of worsening bread shortages. Also on the 23rd February, it was International Women's Day, which brought thousands of women onto the streets protesting about food shortages and calling an end to the war. ...read more.


Rasputin had been universally loathed: the peasants disliked his association with the aristocracy and his abandonment of his roots. Political opposition reviled him as a pivotal figure in the Tsar regime; and the aristocracy hated his influence over the Tsar and saw their leader as a weak-minded individual easily led by an ignorant peasant. He was considered to represent all that was wrong with Tsarist regime, he became a significant figure for opposition to highlight as a justified reason to oppose the regime. The Petrograd Soviet was sailors and workers deputies gathered the main force behind this group was the Menshiviks. The Petrograd Soviet was one factor that caused the October Revolution, as the reason it formed was due to hyperinflation, acute food shortages and inadequate food shortages. Leading revolutionary Trotsky commented 'it would be no exaggeration to say that Petrograd achieved the Russian Revolution....' Indeed, it would be correct to say that the protests and strikes in Petrograd were not the main cause of events. ...read more.


The February revolution was not classified as a true revolution but a palace coup, designed to protect the upper class through the bourgeoisie. This is the same case with the October revolution; it was not a real revolution in Marxist terms. As for this the workers need to overthrow the capitalist but however, the workers didn't but the Bolsheviks did, who were a small elite group of professional revolutionaries. We also have to remember that the disorganisation and chaos of the Provisional Government meant that it was hardly worth overthrowing, it had little choice but to surrender the little power that it still had. The Bolsheviks were able to walk through the gates of the Winter Palace and take national control without putting much of a fight up. This was not really a revolution at all, it makes us think whether there was a revolution at all in 1917. 1 1 Pavandeep Johal ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    This clearly shows a man who is not suitable to run a country, especially a country in dire straights - as Russia was. To add to the discontent, Russia suffered a humiliating defeat to Japan in the Russo-Japanese War of 1905.

  2. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    they were hard to control due to the sheer size of the country. Government spies and police were able to penetrate the parties and limit their effectiveness. This leads some historians to suggest that even the Bolsheviks who were very important in the working class militancy up to 1917, could not really by themselves have threatened tsarism, Hasegawa however disagrees.

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    Another reason is that in source E, his wife tells a different story. His wife says that Medvedev was actually in the room, wasn't asked to go out and in addition to all this, she says that he actually fired at the royal family and even "emptied two or three bullets into the tzar."

  2. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    On March 7th, workers from the Putilov steelworks in Petrograd went on strike, as well as thousands of women supporting international women's day, and many other discontented worker's demanding the government provide bread. From 7th-10th March, the number of striking workers rose to 250,000. Industry had come to a standstill.

  1. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    In January 1916 the daily bread ration per person had fallen to 2.7 lbs, forcing the peasants to rebel against the autocratic regime and protest in order to stay alive. Another cause of tension in Russia that ultimately led to the collapse of Tsarism was the emergence and expansion of a working class.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    This suggests that the policy of 'socialist realism' has been relaxed to allow the 'covered up' aspects of Stalin's regime to be released. This means that the source could be more accurate than it would have been under the reign of Stalin as there was no censorship.

  1. Why there were two Revolutions in Russia in 1917.

    Russia is a huge country, and due to the poor transport system at the time, food was often left to rot in some places when it was desperately needed by poor people. This just aggravated the need for a new government, in the eyes of the population.

  2. Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

    to be a direct threat to other revolutionary groups such as the Mensheviks. In continuation, the role of peasantry was substantial in Lenin?s perspective as the party started planning the February Revolution. The idea of revolution should always be based ?firmly around the proletariat? against the Provisional Government and the April Theses.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work