• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were there Two Revolutions in 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Why were there Two Revolutions in 1917? Russian revolution in 1917 resulted in the collapse of centuries of Tsarism and the establishment of the world's first communist state. There were said to be two revolutions in that year, the first one being in February, which was spontaneous and largely unorganised by the provisional committee. The other revolution being in October which in contrast to the February revolution, was well organised and masterly executed coup d'etat by a party who had skilfully aligned itself with the demands of the worker and peasants. With Russia going into war, may have been a factor, which helped cause the February revolution. An example of this was the economic effects, the acute food shortages. This led to people joining in the full-scale strike called Putilov Steel as they heard rumours of worsening bread shortages. Also on the 23rd February, it was International Women's Day, which brought thousands of women onto the streets protesting about food shortages and calling an end to the war. ...read more.


Rasputin had been universally loathed: the peasants disliked his association with the aristocracy and his abandonment of his roots. Political opposition reviled him as a pivotal figure in the Tsar regime; and the aristocracy hated his influence over the Tsar and saw their leader as a weak-minded individual easily led by an ignorant peasant. He was considered to represent all that was wrong with Tsarist regime, he became a significant figure for opposition to highlight as a justified reason to oppose the regime. The Petrograd Soviet was sailors and workers deputies gathered the main force behind this group was the Menshiviks. The Petrograd Soviet was one factor that caused the October Revolution, as the reason it formed was due to hyperinflation, acute food shortages and inadequate food shortages. Leading revolutionary Trotsky commented 'it would be no exaggeration to say that Petrograd achieved the Russian Revolution....' Indeed, it would be correct to say that the protests and strikes in Petrograd were not the main cause of events. ...read more.


The February revolution was not classified as a true revolution but a palace coup, designed to protect the upper class through the bourgeoisie. This is the same case with the October revolution; it was not a real revolution in Marxist terms. As for this the workers need to overthrow the capitalist but however, the workers didn't but the Bolsheviks did, who were a small elite group of professional revolutionaries. We also have to remember that the disorganisation and chaos of the Provisional Government meant that it was hardly worth overthrowing, it had little choice but to surrender the little power that it still had. The Bolsheviks were able to walk through the gates of the Winter Palace and take national control without putting much of a fight up. This was not really a revolution at all, it makes us think whether there was a revolution at all in 1917. 1 1 Pavandeep Johal ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    But the Tsarist government rejected collaboration with non-governmental agencies and Nicholas II refused to replace any of his ministers so as to produce a more proficient administration. This forced 236 of the 422 Duma legislatures to unite in a 'Progressive Bloc' made up of the Octobrists, Kadets, Nationalists and the Progressive Industrialists.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    The discontent increased further still, as the Duma (the parliament formed to give the middle-class some power) was ignored by the Tsar and in 1912 dissolved. The Tsar's persistent ignoring of the Duma is illustrated by source I, it reads; "'the transport system has broken down...there is disorderly shooting in the streets...some of the troops are firing at each other'.

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    By that amount of time the wall could have natrually corroded. In addition, a photograph can easily be faked. The photo could be an overlay of some damage to a wall etched onto a photograph of that wall, we have no way to tell if it's genuine or not.

  2. Many causes could lead to a revolution. In 1917, there were two distinct Revolutions ...

    her circle, in which the peasant monk Grigory Yefimovich Rasputin was the dominant influence. When the Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, protested against the inefficient conduct of the war and the arbitrary policies of the imperial government, the czar Nicholas II and his ministers simply brushed it aside.

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    The middle classes were not really affected like the peasants, but they too were unhappy with the Tsar by the end of 1916. They were appalled by reports of no first aid and so formed their own Red Cross. Many industrialists by 1916 could not complete war contracts because of

  2. The Russian Revolutions – 1917.

    The Tsar was a week willed, indecisive man who was easily influenced by his wife. The head of the Duma told him in 1916 that Rasputin advising Alexandra undermined his authority, and the Tsar sent an order to get rid of Rasputin.

  1. Russia's sense of uniqueness

    (Like Napoleon- b4 emperor of France was successful soldier then general etc) * To try and deal with these attacks T in 1925 gives up position as 'Commissar (minister) for War' therefore he has no power base therefore he is no longer classed as a threat.

  2. Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

    Furthermore, he agreed with Karl Marx?s concept of history being ?a series of struggles by one class against another.? Adaptations of this ideology of Marxism led to the opposition included the promptness of the Revolution. Lenin believed the Revolution should not be delayed until capitalism developed as this was supposed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work