• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were there two revolutions in Russia in 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Why were there two revolutions in Russia in 1917? The question requires you to examine why the March Revolution happened in the first place; but further, why it failed to solve Russia's crisis. You must also be able to explain how a tiny minority radical group, the Bolsheviks, came to dominate the Russian state in the second revolution, with the support of the urban proletariat. Answer plan 1. Marxist ideology in the early 20th century argued that a society had to go through two revolutions - a liberal bourgeois one, followed much later, at the full development of capitalism, by a socialist revolution led and controlled by "the dictatorship of the proletariat". ...read more.


3. The only real political opposition was in the cities among a Socialist/ Populist intelligentsia; their ideas were intellectual and radical, and Lenin's ideas were essentially anti-western and anti-liberal; the contrast between the Bolshevik and Menshevik approaches; the Mensheviks attempting to retain the orthodox Marxist view of the two revolutions, in spite of the realities of Russian society. 4. The effects of the First World War: a huge economic boom, but the Government and administration were not flexible enough to cope; the Government broke down under the strains of war in 1917; the failure to feed the towns; financial chaos; the distrust of Tsarist circles; the mismanagement of the war effort; desertion of troops. ...read more.


7. The March Revolution occured because of the crisis in Russia's economy and society, and because of the strains of the very rapid development to meet the demands of war; but the liberal bourgeois revolution did not work out in practice; there was no substantial liberal middle class and no true capitalist economic structure to form the base of a Western-style political order; the November Revolution occurred as a logical outcome, almost as a reaction, to Western theory and influence; the Bolsheviks alone seemed to offer a 'real' enough solution to the crisis of Russian society, more particularly the land question. Significantly, the Bolshevik takeover was consolidated by the decrees on land and peace. ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the revolutions of 1848-49 fail to remove foreign influence from Italy?

    It was his insecurity and need to keep the support of the, predominantly catholic, French population that brought his intervention in the revolutions. In order to keep this support he felt he needed to return the pope to power. He did this by sending in 20 000 men to crush the revolutionaries and destroy the Roman Republic.

  2. The Russian Revolutions – 1917.

    He left when trouble was brewing, and ordered soldiers to fire at non-violent protesters, who were holding pictures of him as a sign of respect. He refused to listen to anyone else's advice, and refused to reform when the people made reasonable requests of an eight-hour working day and minimum wage of one rouble a day.

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    This shows a cinflict of sourcwes. The white interview said that he was sent out, but his wife says that he was in the room all the time and actually fired. Again this can prove that the source is unreliable.

  2. In spite of the Czar's decrees and declarations, Russia, by the beginning of the ...

    At this time, the Czar did not lead, his ministers bickered amongst themselves, and cliques and special-interest groups interfered with the conduct of government. Nicholas II never took interest in public opinion, and seemed oblivious to what was happening around him. He was still convinced he could handle Russia himself.

  1. The Radical Phase: 1793-94

    The Great Terror- Last phase of the terror, Spring 1794) (SLIDE 4) As the threat from civil war and regional revolts had been crushed, underlying differences within the Jacobins and the revolutionary sans-culottes intensified. The Left, led by Hebert and the Exaggeres, demanded further controls over the economy to create

  2. Stalin's Russia course work What was wrong with Russia before 1917?

    would over throw the middle class (bourgeoisie) and aristocracy. All land property and industry would be taken over and shared equally. Stalin's early life a) Extreme poverty to absolute power b) Georgian- Georgia- southern Russia c) Land of tribalism and blood feuds d)

  1. The reasons behind the two revolutions in Russia in 1917

    This man was Lenin , leader of the Bolsheviks. He was in exile In Switzerland but the Germans helped him to get back to Petrograd and Lenin arrived on the 16th of April .He declared his ?April These? in which he said he supported the peasants and the soldiers .

  2. Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

    Furthermore, he agreed with Karl Marx?s concept of history being ?a series of struggles by one class against another.? Adaptations of this ideology of Marxism led to the opposition included the promptness of the Revolution. Lenin believed the Revolution should not be delayed until capitalism developed as this was supposed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work