• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were there two revolutions in Russia in 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Why were there two revolutions in Russia in 1917? The question requires you to examine why the March Revolution happened in the first place; but further, why it failed to solve Russia's crisis. You must also be able to explain how a tiny minority radical group, the Bolsheviks, came to dominate the Russian state in the second revolution, with the support of the urban proletariat. Answer plan 1. Marxist ideology in the early 20th century argued that a society had to go through two revolutions - a liberal bourgeois one, followed much later, at the full development of capitalism, by a socialist revolution led and controlled by "the dictatorship of the proletariat". ...read more.


3. The only real political opposition was in the cities among a Socialist/ Populist intelligentsia; their ideas were intellectual and radical, and Lenin's ideas were essentially anti-western and anti-liberal; the contrast between the Bolshevik and Menshevik approaches; the Mensheviks attempting to retain the orthodox Marxist view of the two revolutions, in spite of the realities of Russian society. 4. The effects of the First World War: a huge economic boom, but the Government and administration were not flexible enough to cope; the Government broke down under the strains of war in 1917; the failure to feed the towns; financial chaos; the distrust of Tsarist circles; the mismanagement of the war effort; desertion of troops. ...read more.


7. The March Revolution occured because of the crisis in Russia's economy and society, and because of the strains of the very rapid development to meet the demands of war; but the liberal bourgeois revolution did not work out in practice; there was no substantial liberal middle class and no true capitalist economic structure to form the base of a Western-style political order; the November Revolution occurred as a logical outcome, almost as a reaction, to Western theory and influence; the Bolsheviks alone seemed to offer a 'real' enough solution to the crisis of Russian society, more particularly the land question. Significantly, the Bolshevik takeover was consolidated by the decrees on land and peace. ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    Sokolov also mentions the use of a lorry to transport the corpses away; Medvedevs confession also mentions the use of a lorry. The similarities between the two sources are striking, this leads me to believe that the whites tortured Medvedev to comply with all the results of Sokolovs investigation, and therefore support the findings of his investigation.

  2. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    They saw Stolypin's reforms as a threat to the traditional Russian society where everyone knew their place. Relations between the Tsar and his people became steadily worse. In 1912 the economy declined causing unemployment and hunger. Celebrations for 300 years of Romanov rule in 1913 were meant to bring Russia together, but enthusiasm was very limited.

  1. Why did the revolutions of 1848-49 fail to remove foreign influence from Italy?

    Another factor in the failure was the difference in how to go about the revolutions. Not only was it the aims that differed but also the methods in which to achieve them. There were different extremes, with the liberals such as Balbo and Gioberti and the radicals such as Mazzini.

  2. Why there were two Revolutions in Russia in 1917.

    The Russian Economy also had a major role into why there was the first revolution in Russia in 1917. Peasants were extremely poor and often did not own their own land. Despite this, the Tsar seemed to only be concentrating on the welfare the middle and upper classes of Russia, which was a very small percentage.

  1. Stalin's Russia course work What was wrong with Russia before 1917?

    o It failed to solve food shortages and other economic problems. o The Bolsheviks offered alternative polices which were more popular. Bolshevik revolution o Planned the Bolsheviks to strike at the same time as the all-Russian congress of soviets was meeting in Petrograd.

  2. Both Russian Revolutions stemmed from Russians' dissatisfaction with the Tsarist government's ineptitude

    Again Russian army was defeated swiftly and embarrassingly on the battlefield, further demoralizing the nation. The intelligentsia was also absolutely frustrated with the government's refusal of their help for the war. The brewing dissent again found citizens of St. Petersburg (now named Petrograd)

  1. Why was the Bolshevik revolution of 1917 successful

    The trenches were poorly built and there was no protection from artillery fire. Many of the leading officers were just noblemen who did not know about trench warfare and were in command of peasant soldiers who did not know how to fight.

  2. Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

    Furthermore, he agreed with Karl Marx?s concept of history being ?a series of struggles by one class against another.? Adaptations of this ideology of Marxism led to the opposition included the promptness of the Revolution. Lenin believed the Revolution should not be delayed until capitalism developed as this was supposed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work