• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why were there two revolutions in Russia in 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Why were there two revolutions in Russia in 1917? The question requires you to examine why the March Revolution happened in the first place; but further, why it failed to solve Russia's crisis. You must also be able to explain how a tiny minority radical group, the Bolsheviks, came to dominate the Russian state in the second revolution, with the support of the urban proletariat. Answer plan 1. Marxist ideology in the early 20th century argued that a society had to go through two revolutions - a liberal bourgeois one, followed much later, at the full development of capitalism, by a socialist revolution led and controlled by "the dictatorship of the proletariat". ...read more.


3. The only real political opposition was in the cities among a Socialist/ Populist intelligentsia; their ideas were intellectual and radical, and Lenin's ideas were essentially anti-western and anti-liberal; the contrast between the Bolshevik and Menshevik approaches; the Mensheviks attempting to retain the orthodox Marxist view of the two revolutions, in spite of the realities of Russian society. 4. The effects of the First World War: a huge economic boom, but the Government and administration were not flexible enough to cope; the Government broke down under the strains of war in 1917; the failure to feed the towns; financial chaos; the distrust of Tsarist circles; the mismanagement of the war effort; desertion of troops. ...read more.


7. The March Revolution occured because of the crisis in Russia's economy and society, and because of the strains of the very rapid development to meet the demands of war; but the liberal bourgeois revolution did not work out in practice; there was no substantial liberal middle class and no true capitalist economic structure to form the base of a Western-style political order; the November Revolution occurred as a logical outcome, almost as a reaction, to Western theory and influence; the Bolsheviks alone seemed to offer a 'real' enough solution to the crisis of Russian society, more particularly the land question. Significantly, the Bolshevik takeover was consolidated by the decrees on land and peace. ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    This encouraged many more Russians to join the revolution. Now that the army could not suppress strikes and revolutions, all the discontent that had built up in Russia could be expressed and there would be nothing to stop all the people from revolting.

  2. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    In addition, one could make an argument and say why was he the only one to be sent out? Again this shows that this excuse was probably made up quickly without thought, a sign that he might have been under torture.

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks seize power in 1917?

    The government attempted to use other methods to get the peoples support such as discrimination and violence against Jews, Muslims and minorities. This had little effect. Strikes were on the rise and his own supporters were beginning to doubt him.

  2. Why did the revolutions of 1848-49 fail to remove foreign influence from Italy?

    Another factor in the failure was the difference in how to go about the revolutions. Not only was it the aims that differed but also the methods in which to achieve them. There were different extremes, with the liberals such as Balbo and Gioberti and the radicals such as Mazzini.

  1. The Russian Revolutions – 1917.

    The character of the Tsar Nicholas II was an important factor in the collapse of his government. The Tsar was a family man, and cared greatly about his wife and family. He was keen for his son to be cured and his wife to be happy, and so allowed Rasputin to stay and advise him and his wife.

  2. To What Extent can Individuals be Credited with being Responsible for Revolutions?

    These factors led to riots and eventual loss of faith in their leaders which in turn led to great unrest. The Tsar and Empress cannot take the blame for the weather, but if they had given the peasants the land reforms they wanted and modernised agricultural techniques this could possibly have solved all their famine woes.

  1. Lenin's Importance in the 1917 Revolutions.

    If it weren?t for his constant speeches and texts of manipulation, the lead up to the February Revolution would have been catastrophic. Furthermore, Lenin?s theories and political ideologies based on Marxism were also key to bringing the middle class and peasants into the Party and later into the revolution.

  2. The reasons behind the two revolutions in Russia in 1917

    The Duma demanded immediate action but the Tsar refused. Eventually, the Army ended its support of the Tsar and the soldiers joined the workers in the streets to march with them .The Tsar?s ordered the Duma to stop their meetings but they still held a meeting and set up a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work