• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

With what truth can it be asserted that the U.S.A was the land of equality for all minorities?

Extracts from this document...


With what truth can it be asserted that the U.S.A was the land of equality for all minorities? The idea that the US was a land of equality for all minorities is one that lacks truth and accuracy. Many barriers stood in the way of the US being a land of equality, namely the negative attitude of whites, the Supreme Court, Presidents and Congress' working against them or lack of action to support them, standard of living conditions and education and minority action. The factor that created the greatest barrier was white hostility, although the other factors did play an important part. The negative attitude of white's towards minority groups was a key factor in denying them a land of equality in the U.S. The most notorious anti minority group was the Ku Klux Klan, which used any means possible to deny both African-Americans and the individual minority groups their rights, thus hindering any chance of the US becoming a land of equality for all minorities. Immigrants were targets of their hatred as they blamed for the growth in radical republicans. The Ku Klux Act of 1871 was introduced in order to try and curb their activities, increasing the chances of the US becoming equal and although it was successful in curbing some activities did not expel their activities altogether. The existence of the KKK meant that the US could not be a land of equality for all minorities. ...read more.


This is a clear example to show the United States was not a land of equality because it is a case of institutional racism where specific minorities were excluded. The Supreme Court also played an important part in whether the minorities were equal or not. They made important judgements in the efforts for equality in America, including Browder v Gayle, Plessy v Ferguson, Endo v US, Hernandez v Texas and Sacco Vanzetti, either improving, or denying equality. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hirabayashi v US, Yasui v US and Korematsu v US that the denial of civil liberties based on race and national origin were legal creating a great barrier to the equality of minorities. In a later, contradictory ruling in Endo v US the Supreme Court decided that a loyal citizen could not be detained, but this did not stop the internment. In Hernandez v. Texas the Supreme Court struck down state policies that discriminated against Mexican Americans in jury selection. This was an important positive ruling for the plight of Native Americans as there had not been a person of Mexican origin person on the Jury in Texas for over 25 years which in turn meant that many unfair rulings had been given depending on racist feeling. An example of this is the Sacco and Vanzetti case in which two men had shot dead two Italians after a robbery. ...read more.


In 1972 an American Indian Movement march on Washington culminated in protestors handing President Nixon a 20-point 'position paper' demanding better civil rights. European and Asian immigrants were however less motivated to take action. The main reason behind this for Europeans was the fact that they had a more equal level of living whereas for the Asians it was that they felt that that "sit back and take what is thrown at you" to be more effective. However the fact that some minorities felt action needed to be taken demonstrates that the U.S.A was certainly not a land of equality. In conclusion, America was far from a land of equality for all immigrants. The fact that immigrants had a far lower standard of health, living and working conditions and education are great indicators that the US was not al land of equality for all minorities. Although there were groups and individuals working hard to try and achieve equality for minorities this dream was one which was still greatly out of reach. The lack of helpful interference from Congress, Presidents and Supreme Court throughout this period meant that minorities along with blacks remained inferior to whites. This was also helped along by the severe hostility they received from whites which enforced the segregation and culture gap between whites and minorities. It is therefore possible to say that the US was not a land of equality for all minorities. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1941-80 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1941-80 essays

  1. Civil Rights in the USA 1945-1975

    The first step to all of this was the Brown V Board of Education case, the 2nd step was then the bus boycott, which got quite a lot of attention, and the third step was direct action, where they had to provoke a response.

  2. The USA 1941 - 80 : The Divided Union.

    The fall of McCarthy * Mccarthy accused even president Eisenhower of having Communist sympathies. This upset many loyal republicans. * McCarthys downfall came when he attacked firstly the American Boy scout Movement and then the US Army. * In a series of televised hearings about Communists in the US Army Mccarthy was exposed as a bully and a liar.

  1. Civil Rights In The USA.

    He bled and fought for his beliefs, he was a devout Christian and a family man. Martin Luther King will best be remembered for his peaceful protests and anti-violent demonstrations. He fought non-stop for the desegregation of America, He event went as far as trying to get John.

  2. Writing about Diverse Culture

    The literal level is the digging and machinery causes the statehouse to shake. On the metaphoric level the statue of Colonel Shaw, the leader of the Negro Infantry in the American Civil War shakes in anger. This statue commemorates the Negro soldiers who died to defend everything that the people in the statehouse now take for granted.

  1. Analysis of spoken language: Frasier

    Laughter is achieved from the audience, as Martin tone is very calm and unexpected as well as spontaneous, When Frasier and Niles learn that they have secured a place at a wine tasting event on New Years Eve they are extremely excited with Frasier exclaiming, "On Niles that's brilliant, Dad

  2. "Religion's are notorious for promoting Racial Segregation". Discuss with reference to one specific historical ...

    They were idependant states to which each african was assigned by the governmetn according to the record of origin. This was frequently inaccurate though. This meant all political rights, includign voting, which an african had were restricted to the designated homeland.

  1. The Nationalist Option And Its Consequences on the Movement Towards Equality.

    In addressing the problems of class conflict as well, the writings of influential social theorists such as Herbert Spence, Benjamin Kidd, and William Graham Sumner also stressed the notion that there was a moral imperative to capitalist gains and deemphasized social conflict in favor of the notion of social "equilibration" (Buck, 1959, p.

  2. The modern Ku Klux Klan, or KKK.

    The KKKK designs workbooks for teachers to give them an "accurate perception" about the Christian foundation of education in the United States. These workbooks include information on the struggles White youth face today, how there is a war going on for the minds of White youth in the United States

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work