• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

''Without the First World War British women would not have gained the right to vote in 1918.'' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

''Without the First World War British women would not have gained the right to vote in 1918.'' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? British women over 30 got the vote with the 1918 Representation of the People Act. The law was being changed, to ensure that soldiers coming home from the trenches were able to vote, if they hadn't been changing the law anyway, women were unlikely to have got the vote in 1918. There are many reasons why women got the vote, including: their work during WW1, Lloyd George being a supporter of women's suffrage, the suffragists' campaign of propaganda, the suffragettes' terrorism, the desire of MPs to not alienate potential voters, society's gradually changing attitudes and the fact that Britain did not want to be seen as old-fashioned. During WW1, women undertook jobs that needed doing while men who previously did the jobs were away fighting. They worked in factories making things for the war, like uniforms and shells and took over jobs men had done before the war, like working on farms, driving lorries and delivering coal. This work in factories and other jobs gave women more money and confidence. ...read more.

Middle

vote in 1918, because of the cumulative effect of women's work during the war, and the law change to allow homecoming soldiers to vote. Without it, it is very unlikely that women would have got the vote when they did. The Prime Minister and many MPs were supporters of women getting the vote. Many MPs thought women would be getting the vote soon anyway, and if they were seen as being anti-women they could alienate potential voters. Much of the Government thought women would vote like their husbands, so the effect would be more votes for them. Many MPs were hostile to women's votes in 1912. For example a Conservative leader, Lord Curzon said "Women do not have the experience to be able to vote...[The] way women have been educated, their lack of strength and the duties they have" (Source F). This is useful for describing how MPs felt and suggests that something had to modernise the views of people of the time, bringing them into the 20th Century. It is less useful because it doesn't tell us how MP's attitudes might be changing anyway or whether everybody's attitudes were similar. ...read more.

Conclusion

The world was becoming more and more modern, and Britain didn't want to seem old-fashioned or 'stuck in the past' . This may have encouraged many Brits to support women's suffrage - especially since Germany gave women the vote - whilst we were at war with Germany, no-one wanted to be less modern than the enemy! Britain was under 'peer-pressure' from the rest of the world, and we wanted to be as modern as everyone else - it was inevitable that this would mean women got the vote eventually - though World War One probably sped this up and got women the vote in 1918. Overall, I think that without the First World War, women may not have got the vote in April 1918, although I think that they may have got the vote very soon afterwards anyway. The Government would certainly have wanted people to think that women were gaining the right to vote because of their actions during the war. It would not have been a good idea for the Government to be seen to be giving in to terrorism at a time when the IRA were attempting to secure Home Rule for Ireland. In the end, World War One was a catalyst in getting women the vote, but they would have got it in the first half of the 20th Century anyway. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

This is a very thorough and detailed response that shows strong understanding of the source material and awareness of the need to consider its provenance. The author reaches a sound judgement and links sources to knowledge now although some points on reliability could be questioned. 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 07/10/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extend do you agree with Rhodes view that the British Empire was ...

    5 star(s)

    Due to the empire Britain gained more land, more soldiers and more allies to help vend itself off against invading countries, for example Gibraltar was a perfect site for a navel base because from the bottle neck it formed with the tip of Africa to create a unique guarding spot to defend the entrance of the Mediterranean.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    What Were the Consequences of the First World War for the British People 1914 ...

    4 star(s)

    to make as many weapons or ships, so there wasn't as much investment in these industries as before / during the war. As these businesses were losing money they would have to make job cuts or reduce employer's wages, which further added to the unemployment problems.

  1. Peer reviewed

    How effective were the suffragists and suffragettes.

    4 star(s)

    is also very little to claim that the suffragists aided the campaign as they achieved noticeably little. Their campaign resulted only in a pile of unsuccessful bill but it didn't damage female suffrage because it was democratic and was done in the manner expected of women in the Edwardian period.

  2. Why did World War One break out in 1914?

    The German empire was growing and the separate states had joined together to make Germany very powerful. However it was Britain that was the richest nation in the world.

  1. Explain the importance of the battle of Britain as a turning point of the ...

    of the whole world, so for that, I have to give kudos to the Battle of Britain as a remarkable and probably the most symbolic victory of the War. This is despite the fact that even if we had lost the Battle of Britain I believe that our navy could have defeated the German armada.

  2. WHO WAS TO BLAME FOR THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR?

    He had been a success in Scotland. He came to England with strong ideas on the power that the king should have, but very little money. Scotland was poor compared to England. James Believed that god had chosen him to be king.

  1. Evacuation in Britain during the Second World War

    Another point is that the reason for the interview is unknown. The teacher may have been angry about the evacuation process and so the source could possibly be slightly unbalanced or exaggerate, though, even if this was the case, it can still give us what those involved actually thought about evacuation.

  2. Some people have the view that British generals like Haig were incompetent leaders. How ...

    opinion that the leaders like Haig were not to blame for the disaster. Some historians believe that the inexperienced soldiers should be blamed for the vast majority of deaths. Source B13 are diary entries that belonged to Haig himself which he used as the bass for his reports to the War Cabinet.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work