• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War Use the Sources and your own knowledge to explain whether you agree this view

Extracts from this document...


Without the work of women on the Home Front, Britain could not have won the First World War Use the Sources and your own knowledge to explain whether you agree this view (14) During the First World War the men of Britain went to war and left Britain to the waiting hands of the women who came out of their domestic house jobs to go into factories and do things like make munitions to help the war effort. Most of these new jobs that were suddenly on offer the women had never had the opportunity to do before. There are many discussions as to whether Britain would not have succeeded in World War One had the women not taken over from the men when they left. Before 1914 Britain had never really needed the help of the women for the economy, suddenly opportunities opened everywhere for the women. Supplies were needed for the British army. Food and clothing was needed for the men fighting, women continued to farm and plough and ensure that both the army and the women and children left back in Britain had enough food as it was getting more and more difficult to ship in food from other countries. ...read more.


Like many countries at this time, they turned to propaganda. Source E is an example of a poster produced by the British government in 1916 around the time of the Battle Of Ypres. As propaganda tends to do, the poster gives a seemingly false impression of working in a munitions factory as it makes it seem bright and fun. But this poster, and many like it raise the point of how important it was that the women stepped in and pulled Britain through the war. The land army was another job that many women began between 1914 and 1918. Before this time women farming was practically unheard of but when the war began it became vital. The women who wanted to join the land army could chose between three sections, they were agriculture, timber cutting and forage. 100,000 women were soon working in the land army and this was one of the most physically demanding jobs they could do, to save money and fuel everything had to be done by hand. Once the war begun the Germans began sinking American merchant ships that were brining food into Britain, this meant Britain had to fend for themselves and bring in the harvest and work the farms. ...read more.


Obviously Britain did not win the war purely because the women in Britain were helping the war effort, the soldiers who went to war and the allies like France were the main role but when people talk about victory for Britain, the fact that the women were major factors in the success is often over looked. I do believe that without the work of the women on the Home Front Britain could not have won the First World War because Britain would have fallen to pieces while the men were away had the women not stepped in. When Britain ran out of shells in 1915 the women back home turned to the factories in their thousands to support the men fighting in Belgium. Many women were working in highly dangerous situations for very little wages to ensure both the women and children at home and the men at war had food to eat, cloths to wear, medial attention when they were injured and transportation. I think that the soldiers and the power of the allies were the main reason Britain won but if the women had refused to work, the British economy would have bust and Britain would starve and have had to step out of the war. I think that the soldiers were not the only war heroes of World War One. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extend do you agree with Rhodes view that the British Empire was ...

    5 star(s)

    However, Cecil Rhode gave this interpretation that the British Empire had positive effects on both sides because during the 19 centaury the empire was stressing that benefits of the empire help both Britain and the colonies, Cecil Rhode was benefiting from the empire therefore creating his interpretation that the empire was beneficial to all.

  2. How were the lives of women on the home front affected by the First ...

    What she wants to tell is before the war women had long hours with poor earning. During the war it was still quite long hours and poor work conditions but there was a lot more money. As this is a letter to a museum, this source is quite reliable.

  1. How were the lives of women on the home front affected by the First ...

    It was written in 1976, so she may of only remembered the best parts about it, and forgotten some of the bad things. Source 2 backs this up, which is a woman as a bus conductor. She looks very happy to be doing this job.

  2. Role of women during the First World War

    going to the front, then, the rise in female employment wouldn't have taken place in 1915. This is because there wouldn't be an increasing demand of war economy if there wasn't an increase in the number of men going to the front.

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    Source A depicts evacuees walking to the station in London. This suggests that evacuation was well-ordered as all the children are walking in an orderly fashion; they are all smiling and a few are waving. This shows that the children were content in being evacuated.

  2. Source Work- Women in World War 1

    The letter was written in March 2007, when he had been Prime Minister for 4 months. He expressed thanks on January 11th, which the NUWSS has reminded the Prime Minister of - women 'have helped to win the war and without them we could not have done it.

  1. Did The First World War Liberate British Women?

    Source A3 could be very reliable very reliable, as it is a primary source, but as it is a cartoon it would probably have been exaggerated which may discredit the source slightly. However, I think the utility of the source outweighs this as it is extremely useful in showing the attitudes people had of women from the time.

  2. How did world war one affect opportunities for women in Britain?

    That is 735,000 women employed in four years. Things like the munitions shortage and conscription, which was introduced in 1916 for men aged between 18-41, helped things move along quicker. Although these employment figures for women are very impressive on the outside, the conditions in which the women had to work in were often dangerous.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work