• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Women's Suffrage

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Women's Suffrage Arguments For: * The vote is a way of getting rid of other inequalities. Such as in pay, values, marriage-divorce * Less women resort to prostitution: because if women earned more they would not have to resort to prostitution. * Women were capable of being in politics, women were already changing inequalities, some were already in local elections * Britain should take example from other countries, like Australia, New Zealand and the USA * There had been changes in women's roles; women were getting better jobs, higher salaries and better living conditions. * The vote will improve men's moral and sexual behaviour, the WSPU felt that the women were the defenders of virtue whereas as men were the destroyers of chastity * Women are entitled to the vote, more and more men were getting the vote, but more and more qualified women were not, why should an illiterate male farmer get the vote when an educated, literate women he worked for does not * Britain is not a true democracy until women had the vote. How could Britain claim they were democratic when over half their adult population couldn't vote. Against: * Men and women have separate 'Spheres', may believed that men and women had different roles, men were meant to work and be interested in politics, while women were meant to clean and cook. ...read more.

Middle

This became known as the Women's Social and Political Union - Leaders chosen by members, non-democratic organization - controlled by Pankhursts. - Learned from Christabel's actions such as spitting in face of policeman that militancy was news - Mainly working class women but after 1906 - moved headquarters to London and membership of working class fell - more upper and middle class women. - Mrs Pankhurst believed it would take an active organisation, with young working class women, to draw attention to the cause. The motto of the suffragettes was 'deeds not words' and from 1912 onwards they became more militant and violent in their methods of campaign. Law-breaking, window-smashing, violence and hunger strikes all became part of this society's campaign tactics. - In 1907 the Women's Social and Political Union itself split into two groups after Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughter Christabel came into conflict with other members of the WSPU's executive body. Those who left formed the Women's Freedom League, while the Pankhursts and their supporters established an even tighter grip on the workings of the WSPU. - The rough treatment of many suffragettes arrested and jailed during the course of their protests also won the suffrage cause increasing sympathy and support from the public. The commendable behaviour of the suffrage movement during the war - suspending their protests for the sake of national unity - also proved that the women were far from unreasonable. ...read more.

Conclusion

Make a comparative assessment stating which is more reliable and why. AGREE/DISAGREE: - if asks agree also look at disagree and vice-versa. Draw a conclusion How far....something something. : -Explain which sources do and do not support statement (cross referencing sources). Then explain at end overall whether u think sources do or do not support statement. Violent methods of suffragettes help? YES * Made female suffrage front page news - attention of government and public * Raised so much publicity the issue of votes 4 women would never go away * As time went on people more accustomed to idea of women having the vote * Asquith already firmly against women getting vote, so violent methods cant make things worse. Asquith's views and harsh treatment of suffragettes were not caused by violence. NO * Violence played into hands of government, gave them excuse not 2 give women vote. Could argue its wrong to give into violence * Violence turned moderate men (and MP's) against ideas of women votes. This is why bills in house of commons (Conciliation Bill 1913) were always defeated * Violence supported view that women not responsible enough to handle vote - too emotional and hysterical. * In 1913, and 1914, NUWSS was growing popularity at expense of WSPU - some women turned away from violence ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Women's Suffrage Sources Questions

    Most of the of the press coverage that was received by these actions by the Suffragettes was indeed bad, and some reports indicated that by women doing all of these antics, had set their own cause back.

  2. History questions on Emmeline Pankhurst.

    Not until 1918 were women rewarded with the vote. Men had been abroad fighting and you had to be living in the country for a year in order to eligible for the vote, so they were changing the law anyway. However the counterproductive tactics used by the suffragettes highlighted the issue of women's suffrage.

  1. The Changing roles of women

    Though women over the age of 30 had gained the vote in 1918, it was another 10 years before women could vote on equal terms to men; it was in 1928 that the Equal Franchise Act let all women over the age of 21 have the vote.

  2. Votes for women - source related questions.

    This fact is suggesting to us that perhaps, the government wanted to seem generous in their giving women the vote (in order to persuade them to aid in the rebuilding of the country) but they also did not want to upset male voters.

  1. Women's Suffrage

    and even churches ."Destructive militancy", wrote Emily Pankhurst had now broken down on an unparalleled scale. Obviously these actions were not taken well, the opinion of the government and probably many others was that, how is behaving in such a terrible, irresponsible manner helping their cause?

  2. HITLER'S POPULARITY

    builds up in my chest, but I'm not going to give in. Another nurse comes in through the doors leading to my cell, holding a tube. What is it for? More nurses come into my new accommodation; they come in with just themselves, no possible weapons.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work