• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

World War 1 Promises

Extracts from this document...


World War One Promises During World War One Britain made several promises in the forms of letters to various people. The first was the McMahon letter. This was written to Sherif Hussein, the leader of the Arabs in the Middles east, by Sir Henry McMahon, British High Commissioner in Egypt. It pleaded the British cause to the Arabs saying that is the Arabs supported Britain against Turkey in WW1 the British would give their support for the freedom of the Arabs peoples as a nation. The letter also stated that the area to the left of Damascus, which includes Palestine, was excluded from the agreement. The letter was written in 1915 The second promise was to the general Jewish community. The letter was actually sent to Lord Rothschild, a leading member of the Jewish community. The letter was called the Balfour Declaration after the man who wrote it, Sir Arthur Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary. ...read more.


This would have seemed like an insult to their nation saying they needed protecting. Some Jews however may have seen that having British protection could be useful as it would let the nation rebuild itself while the Britons protected them. They would also benefit from British technology and industry. Palestinian Arabs Reaction The Palestinian Arabs would have been initially happy but the release of the McMahon letter by the British as it showed support for their cause against the Turks. However critics may have pointed out that the letter excluded that area west of Damascus, which includes Palestine, so therefore the promise was useless to the Arabs living in that area.. As well as this perceptive Arabs may have seen that the British were only to support so that they would help them fight Turkey. The Arabs would have hated the Balfour Declaration. They would have seen this document as a betrayal by the British; however literary Arabs would have notice the catch in the letter and see the letter not as a disaster but merely as a setback. ...read more.


Also the war had cost the Jews international support as with their "pre-emptive" air strike they had actually started the conflict. Some Jews would have been unhappy because in their religion it says "thou shall not kill" and in the war many soldiers died on both sides. Palestinian Arab Reaction The Palestinians reaction would have been of despair as their neighbours combined forces had been defeated. They had also lost control of Jerusalem, a central city in their nation and in their religion. They would also be depressed because their territories had been taken away form benevolent powers and given to the Jews who were likely to be intolerant and hard rulers. Some Arabs however might see that the Jews had united palatine again and all that was needed now was a revolt. The hatred and terror of the war could also have affected many Arabs who could possibly be come future suicide bombers. ?? ?? ?? ?? Page 1 of 3 Tom Everett 11X ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Gallic war

    Wars and Expansion Pompey's Extraordinary Commands and the Eastern Settlement Pompey's rise to power/breakdown of Sullan constitution * 83 ? Pompey raised an army to support Sulla[Cd17] against Marius. Was granted propraetorian imperium for the command of army; was not only far below required age for extraordinary command but had also never served in public office.

  2. history coursework - arab israeli conflict

    It basically says that the Arabs actually caused the whole refugee problem, and that the Jewish had nothing to do with it. They say that the massacre at Deir Yassin was committed by terrorists, and was nothing to do with the Jewish government.

  1. Arab-Israeli Conflict

    The war in Yom Kippur saw a major change in Arab tactics. They used Yom Kippur, they Israeli holy day, to attack Israel. This gave them the advantage because all soldiers were at leave. However, this did not go to plan to the Arab liking because Israeli soldiers were quickly

  2. Causes of WW1

    Accept the collaboration in Serbia of organs of the Austro-Hungarian government in the suppression of the subversive movement directed against the territorial integrity of the monarchy; 6. Begin a judicial inquiry against the accessories to the plot of June 28th who are on Serbian territory, with organs delegated by the Austro-Hungarian government participating in the investigation; 7.

  1. Courses of WW1

    Nationalism Nationalism has two meanings. The first one is desire for independence by the people occupies by the largest power. This is the position Serbia were in. The second meaning is to regain nation greatness. France wanted to do this as Alsace-Lorraine was taken from them.

  2. question 5 source questions Arab Israeli conflict

    pouring instead of weird potions into the cauldron, which is representing the Middle East, munitions, planes and war equipment is being thrown in. It is trying to show that the USA and the USSR caused the war because of there own personal vendettas due to cold war rivalry.

  1. British Recruitment WW1

    This source is useful, because it epitomises the false British confidence in a speedy, simple war. Buxton even was certain of the exact date he could return to Cambridge. The source captivates how confident and self-assured people were of returning alive, and returning quickly. However the source's utility stops there.

  2. The Panchayat system as an early form of conflict resolution in Trinidad.

    The Panchayat functioned as pressure group in 1899. However, formal associations eventually took the form of friendly societies, founded in the 1920s to provide villagers with death benefits, sick relief and medical costs. At the end of World War I, East Indians in Trinidad began to participate more fully and actively in the colonial campaign for social, economic

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work