• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

World War One

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework- World War One 1. The writer and cartoonist who designed Source A are trying to send the message to British readers that the troops have hit the Somme with succession and are winning the battle. The picture in the source is a map of the Western Front being portrayed as a German or the Kaiser. The outlined face looks as though he is about to swallow Verdun but also has a look of surprise as a fist, which is labelled as 'British Army', is pummelling straight onto the Germans nose, which is where the Somme is marked. This is implying that the Britons are attacking the Somme with force, damaging the German army and having more power than them. The punch is also meant to represent the new attack on the Somme forcing the Kaiser away from Verdun. The title ' The Day Goes Well For Our Patriotic Heroes' is also another piece of lying and misleading propaganda that is giving the idea that the first day of the Battle of the Somme was successful on Britain's behalf. It also shows that we are winning the war giving people at home the thought of joining the army when in fact a considerably large amount of men have had to sacrifice their life with 20,000 dead on the first day. ...read more.

Middle

One picture shows a man in a small cramped trench carrying someone over his shoulder that is most likely injured or even dead. The second picture is of another man also helping an injured soldier in the trench. He had probably gone over to 'No Mans Land', been shot and somebody had gone to collect him from the rear trenches. These two pictures potray soldiers 'going over' but in fact they are at a training ground and even without a caption we can know this as they have no backpacks on and there is no barbed wire/defense mechanisms above ground. Source H is a true extract from the experience of one of the 'Bradford Pals Battalion' and he was one of the many who went over and attacked on the first day of the Battle of the Somme so this piece of writing is a valid piece of evidence to describe life going over into 'No Mans Land'. William Slater (the writer) describes going over the top at the Somme like "strolling along through a park" which agrees with what the men were supposedly told to do by Rawlinson. ...read more.

Conclusion

First, a man named Fuller said 'His stubbornness in the offensive all but ruined us on the Somme' and the PW Turner in 'Not For Glory' said 'the whole planning of the Somme campaign was ham-fisted and clumsy' and ' the fault of the failure of most of the strategic planning must fall on Haig.' All quotes deny Haig praise for his work. But source A, a piece of Propaganda is a map of the Western Front being portrayed as the Kaiser. The outlined face has a look of surprise as a fist, which has the words 'British Army' imprinted on it, is pummelling straight into the Germans nose, which is where the Somme is marked. This is representing the idea that the British soldiers are succeeding at the Somme and fighting with force, damaging them where it hurts. So overall it is showing Haigs plan as a successful one. After reviewing all evidence, sources, propaganda and quotes I have made the decision that General Douglas Haig was a not a slaughterer but not the most brilliant commander either. He had to make a series of tough, historic choices and though his Somme plan was very odd and contained plans which did not make sense we still won the Battle Of The Somme and that was our goal. ?? ?? ?? ?? Reuben Conibear- 10X2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Dad's Army" - How much can you learn from these sources about the work ...

    Therefore I think that the BBC program was true to the spirit of life in the Home Guard by making it a light-hearted comedy. "The Home Guard was a group of enthusiastic amateurs ill-prepared to meet the threat of German invasion".

  2. The Battle of Verdun.

    Source J is an interpretation of the success of the German attack on Verdun. What are the strengths and weaknesses of this interpretation? Explain your answer using Source J and knowledge from your studies. Source J has few strengths but a lot more weaknesses as an interpretation of the German attack on Verdun.

  1. Dear Diary, It was the start of the Christmas month and I was ready ...

    steel pickets and rolls of wire. The pickets should be knocked into place by muffled mallets. When fastened to the pickets, the wire was pulled out to make what was known as an apron. That camp has taught me loads all of this I know already in my thick head.

  2. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the Western Front in the years 1915-1917.

    There were only 49 tanks that were used. These broke down and got stuck in the mud, but when they did get to the German front-line they caused panic among them. But there were too few of them to cause too much panic among the Germans. So overall the tanks did not cause much of a difference in the Battle of the Somme.

  1. Causes of World War 2

    Territorial Clauses - Germany was forced to hand over the land of Alsace Lorraine back over to France and had to give up countless other plots of land all over the world especially in Africa. This would have left Germany in a bitter but determined state to regain the lands that German people thought was rightfully theirs.

  2. History Sourcework- Field Marshal Haig Final

    Source E is Haig's view of the Somme campaign. It indirectly criticises Haig, showing lack of comprehension of events. The first extract shows his strength of personality and acceptance of losses, something that the public could not and many still cannot comprehend. However, the second and third extracts show up Haig as a poor leader, seeming oblivious to the

  1. Does General Douglas Haig deserve his reputation of being the Butcher of the Somme?

    General Douglas Haig was also blamed for being an inflexible commander. He stuck to the plans even though he had realised they were not working. He sent wave after wave of men to their deaths.

  2. Was Field Marshall Douglas Haig more important that the allied blockade of German naval ...

    The idea was to stop the Allies massing their defence in a single place. It was very effective. The Germans broke through the allied lines in many places, advanced 64 Km and Paris was now in range of heavy gunfire.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work