• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

World War One History Sources Question: How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Coursework Assignment 2: Assessment Objectives 2 and 3 a) Study Sources A and B. How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men? Source A, seems to imply that Haig was heartless and that he was quite uncaring. On the surface he appeared to be a demanding and selfish leader, not taking into consideration the welfare of his men, for example he said, "The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists." ...read more.

Middle

He appears to be more involved with his troops and complimented them, very different to in Source A where he had no optimism or positive comments about his troops whatsoever. Source B suggests that there was more to Haig than was first thought; it then gives the impression that Source A most probably was not the complete document and so that should be taken into consideration. In source A, Haig may have just been being practical, he may have been trying to relate to people that men were going to die and people would have to take into account the seriousness of the situation. ...read more.

Conclusion

In a way the population were quite na�ve, because they believed the army to be a "true" army. This was because it was, a high morale, volunteer army (not conscripted) that meant they did not think any harm could come to the troops. Haig had to raise awareness of the true facts of war, he knew about the horrors of Verdun and therefore had to try and relate this to the population by appearing uncaring, when he was really only trying to get straight to the point and prepare them for what may happen. Emilie Murphy 10F 9th July 2002 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Women in world war one

    Implying she was being picked on; 'None of the men' liked that she was receiving their full 'rate of pay as a result they never 'spoke to her'. This source is reliable as it was recorded around the time of the incident.

  2. womens crsk history

    as they were denied the right to vote by the MPs that they had been supporting. Form 1912 - 1914, the Suffragettes turned violent. By using the Sources and my own knowledge, I know that the ways in which women tried to win the vote in the year before the

  1. Study source A. Does it prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    the part of the officers and men, no superiority of arms and ammunition, however great, will enable victories to be won without the sacrifices of men's lives". Which means that no trainging, no abilities of commanders, no ammunition no matter how good, will allow victory to be gained without soldiers dying?

  2. Evactuation Coursework: Question One

    It was also created to encourage nations to disarmament, enforce the treaty of Versailles and most importantly prevent another world war from happening. Members of the treaty of Versailles included Britain, France, Italy and another 39 countries. However three major countries did not join the league which in turn made it weak from the beginning.

  1. Modern history

    Contribution was made by raising money and campaigning in elections. To further highlight this, in 1887, the Women's Liberal Federation was established. Furthermore, women also had financial privileges such as if women owned their own house, she became the ratepayer.

  2. Study sources A and B. how far does source A prove that Haig does ...

    This is purely because this is what general Haig thought to be happening, as he himself didn't go to the front. He believed this was the truth, as he knew no different. Source C however can definitely be trusted as it is, as we know, nearer to the truth.

  1. How far do these sources prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    so is his hair his uniform is also very formal and smart. This infers that he is good with rules regulations and discipline and he has also previously been a soldier. The way that he is dressed looking very smart and important portrays him as hero that other people would look up to.

  2. How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    Firstly Private George Coppard would have had first hand experience in the front line at the trenches. Haig on the other hand wouldn't have had this sort of experience. Because of this, I am assuming that when he says, "the barbed wire has never been so well cut", he has

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work