• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

World War One History Sources Question: How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Coursework Assignment 2: Assessment Objectives 2 and 3 a) Study Sources A and B. How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his men? Source A, seems to imply that Haig was heartless and that he was quite uncaring. On the surface he appeared to be a demanding and selfish leader, not taking into consideration the welfare of his men, for example he said, "The nation must be prepared to see heavy casualty lists." ...read more.

Middle

He appears to be more involved with his troops and complimented them, very different to in Source A where he had no optimism or positive comments about his troops whatsoever. Source B suggests that there was more to Haig than was first thought; it then gives the impression that Source A most probably was not the complete document and so that should be taken into consideration. In source A, Haig may have just been being practical, he may have been trying to relate to people that men were going to die and people would have to take into account the seriousness of the situation. ...read more.

Conclusion

In a way the population were quite na�ve, because they believed the army to be a "true" army. This was because it was, a high morale, volunteer army (not conscripted) that meant they did not think any harm could come to the troops. Haig had to raise awareness of the true facts of war, he knew about the horrors of Verdun and therefore had to try and relate this to the population by appearing uncaring, when he was really only trying to get straight to the point and prepare them for what may happen. Emilie Murphy 10F 9th July 2002 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. womens crsk history

    This means that the Suffragettes tried peacefully cooperation with the government so they gave up and now "we will fight for our cause". This means that the Suffragettes would fight militantly and violently for their cause to get the right to vote.

  2. Study source A. Does it prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    He shows the public that he is being realistic and serious about his job-meaning that he might care. In Source B the problem about this extracts is that it was based on false information given to the general by his messenger John Charters.

  1. Modern history

    Helen Blackburn stated in her volume 'Women's Suffrage' that in 1837 there was 'no High Schools for girls', in addition to the fact that 'women could not enter university'. Moreover, 'women did not have any rights' whatsoever over and their 'husbands were the sole guardians of their children'.

  2. How far do these sources prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    so is his hair his uniform is also very formal and smart. This infers that he is good with rules regulations and discipline and he has also previously been a soldier. The way that he is dressed looking very smart and important portrays him as hero that other people would look up to.

  1. How Far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    Although source A was written by Haig it does not necessarily mean that you can trust it. Haig may have been given false information about how well it was going. The first extract says how well the preparations were going but we know that he didn't actually see this with

  2. Votes For Women, 1908-12 Sources Question

    The conservative party was against women's suffrage and did not want women to have the vote because that would encourage them to pursue careers and leave the home, which may lead to less child birth and male positions being threatened.

  1. First World War Sources Questions

    Source 12 describes Haig's policy as being "wise, loyal and energetic". This means that the Allied Commander believed fully in the General. This shows that Haig was intelligent and that he was devoted to his country. Source 13, by Haig himself, highlights qualities in Haig.

  2. How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    Instead Haig went against the suggestion by launching a great offensive followed by a massive tightly controlled infantry attack. "No amount of skill on the part of the higher commanders". I think Haig's deputy Rawlinson did have a lot of skill.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work