• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

World War One Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework 05/2002 Question One Source A is not a useful source to historian's studying the attitudes of British soldiers towards their commanding officers as it only shows one point of view. The cartoonist may, however be representing the feelings of men at the time. Although the cartoonist has drawn a very amusing satirical picture, it is not very useful to historians as the caption and imagery are all of the artists own devising, and the cartoonist was probably not very well informed about the real conditions at the front, he may have heard the biased reports at the time about how perfect everything was and although his cartoon is very realistic, it is not witting and therefore not as useful to a historian as one from the front lines would have been. Source B is not particularly useful either as it is a fictional account. The view is however, very realistic despite being unwitting. It has been accurately written and may provide a historian with some idea of alternative views that may have been around at the time. The researching historian could then investigate these in order to gain a clearer impression of the men's attitudes towards their officers. Source C is extremely biased and as such is not much use to a modern historian. The source is a direct quote from Haig's son and as such he would naturally support his Father's decisions. ...read more.


on it, pointing out from the poster. This source only shows some people's views on Haig. It shows that some people in Britain did not have the respect for Haig that he wished to command. This source is unwitting and does not support John Keegan's view that Haig was an "efficient, highly skilled" officer; it says exactly the opposite that some people did not think that Haig was helping Britain, more hindering them in the war. The next source, E is written by Haig himself, it is a contemporary source but is biased in favour of him. The source is about how well the war is going and how no matter how many casualties there are, the war is for a good cause. The source would be slightly useful to a historian as it would tell them exactly what was going on at the time and how Haig viewed his own command and how he considered the loss of so many of the men under his command. This source does support Keegan's views on Haig, but it is biased and as such is not a reliable source for a historian to use. Source F is a secondary source as it was written after the First World War; in 1989 this means that it is less useful to a historian than a contemporary source would be however the source is, witting. ...read more.


The Germans are saying how much they approve of Haig but this is only because he is sending men over the top to the mercy of the German machine gunners, they respect him as a General because he is not commanding the BEF (British Expeditionary Force) particularly well. Source K is not a contemporary source; it was written a long time after the War, in 1998, it is a direct quote from a British magazine. The source vaguely agrees with Keegan's statement as it says that to pile the entire guilt of the war onto one man is too extreme, but it does not praise Haig's actions as Keegan does. It simply says that although Haig was not a brilliant General there was probably no one better around Britain at the time for commanding the British armies. Source L:1 This source shows how wrapped up Haig was in his ideas and was oblivious to other suggestions. He ignored good advice in case taking it caused him to lose face. This source disagrees with Keegan's views and says almost the opposite as a good officer should be able to take good advice, Haig's taking of this advice may have resulted in a reduced death toll. Keegan's views do not seem to be amply supported in the sources that I have found. This may mean that people with his views are few and far between or may mean that not many people hold those same views. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    who realised that if Germany was to win the war they had to deliver a knock-out blow to the Allies before American troops arrived. In March 1918 he therefore launched 'Operation Michael'. This operation entailed three fresh armies of Germany's top storm troops break through the stalemate at the western front.

  2. Women in world war one

    It is useful in that it shows us an example of some of the mistreatment women suffered in doing what they felt was right for them and future generations. Another sacrifice that woman took was in keeping their jobs, while not even enjoying it.

  1. Jarrow: questions 3, 4 and 5 (sources)

    Study all of the sources "Jarrow's problems were caused by the polices of the national government" use the sources and your own knowledge to explain whether you agree with this view. Jarrow is a town near Newcastle. Jarrow was mainly famous for shipbuilding and many of the people in Jarrow relied on ship building as a living.

  2. Windsor Coursework

    means there is more noise and pollution created by the tourists and also the tourist pedestrians walking around means residents tend to avoid leaving the house due to overcrowding. Also tourist feel they are treated unfairly due to Residents being entitled to something knows as " The advantage card" which

  1. World war 1

    On the other hand Source F provides us with different information about Haig and the Battle of Somme. I think this is more correct information because of our background information of the war; Haig was criticised for his tactics by Prime Minister David Lloyd George, 'for his deeply flawed strategies'.

  2. Women's Suffrage Sources Questions

    It helped to shift the gap between women wanting the vote and women actually claiming for the vote. I also believe that without the movement of the suffragists, the suffragette movement would not have been taken seriously, and I believe that the suffragette movement along would have shown a lack

  1. Britain And The Western Front of World War One - Sources Questions

    The trenches were also infested with lice and other vermin. The smell was the worst though; unemptied latrine buckets, half buried bodies decomposing, rotting sandbags and the acrid smoke that choked your lungs hung in the air so thick the suns light barely ever reached the ground.

  2. Votes for women - source related questions.

    Pre 1914 women had no real way of proving themselves on mass. Despite the fact that, in some individual cases women managed to prove themselves, individual cases were not enough to change the viewpoint of the nation, or the notion of the government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work