• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

20th century gun controllers and protestors of the right-to-carry law are trying to infringe on our rights as free American citizens by requesting that guns be banned or restricted.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Thomas Jefferson, author of The Declaration of independence, stated to William Stephens Smith in 1787: "What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms." 20th century gun controllers and protestors of the right-to-carry law are trying to infringe on our rights as free American citizens by requesting that guns be banned or restricted. Restrictions on firearms while protecting yourself on private property currently do not exist and honest Americans in numerous states are fighting for their right to protect themselves by carrying a concealed weapon in public. Americans use firearms to defend themselves from criminals about 760,000 times a year. This is the lowest figure among a group of 15 nationwide polls done by organizations including Gallup and the Los Angeles Times (Lott, John R Jr. More 11). Those who want to place gun restricting laws don't understand the reasons that it is our right to bear arms and protect ourselves. Legalizing concealed gun carry will increase accidental deaths by less than 1%, but will dramatically reduce rapes, aggravated assaults, and murder (Lott, John R Jr. More 43). We shouldn't have to fight for the right to protect ourselves. These people that want more restrictions make statements like, "If everyone has a gun there would have to be more gun related incidents", which is clearly not the case based on previous studies of counties that allow weapons to be carried. ...read more.

Middle

The constitution states the government has no authority over the firearms ownership of the people (Koopman 192). This statement is very clear and cannot be easily misinterpreted. If you restrict these rights in any way, shape, or form, you are clearly violating the constitution and I don't know how anyone could say differently. This is not only about guns, it is about freedom. The people who want to place banns or restrictions on guns do not realize that they will only be banning and restricting guns from honest citizens who obey all the current gun laws. The people who have guns that shouldn't are going to get them anyway, and when they do they're not going to register them or go tell the police, "make sure you guys know I have a gun in case I do anything I'm not supposed to". That would be completely stupid. Whether it is the black market or manufacturing homemade guns, they will find a way to get them. As of 1997 there are 200- 240 million guns in our nation, 75-80 million of them are handguns. There are about 60-65 million owners of guns nationwide. Of these gun owners 11% of them and 13% of handgun owners have used their firearms for protection from criminals (Lott, John R. Jr. More). It is way too late to start banning, restricting, licensing, or making new laws on guns. ...read more.

Conclusion

More 43) Using 1995 numbers, this amounts to: -1 more accidental death -316 less murders -939 less rapes -and 14,702 less aggravated assaults in these 10 states annually(Lott, John R. Jr. and Mustard). As you can clearly see passing laws such as these will help keep America a safer place and will guarantee our freedom. As of 1998, no permit holder has ever shot a police officer. This proves again that usually people who have right-to-carry have enough sense to carry. There have been several cases in which a permit holder has protected an officer's life (Lott, John R. Jr and Mustard). If reading the 2nd Amendment a few extra times or the real life statistics regarding crime rates dropping don't influence your decision to vote yes on right-to-carry laws you are probably just scared by guns altogether. If we only allow criminals to possess guns and have no defense we will be risking the well being of our families. I'm not saying that someone can store nuclear weapons or huge missiles at their home but sometimes you don't have time to wait for police and a semi automatic weapon or machine gun might save your life. As long as people teach children about gun safety at a young age and give the weapon some respect guns can greatly reduce our crime rates and help America to continue to be "land of the free". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    Founded on patristic and popular attitudes "older than the rationalistic one that had developed since the twelfth century," this antipathetic tradition "maintained the idea of a sinister, immoral, insidious Orient." The notion of an "insidious" Orient had as its corollary, I would argue, the premise that Islam was a Christian heresy, an internal perversion of the putatively true faith.

  2. Is Nuclear Power the Answer for the Future?

    * Can be unreliable unless you're in a very sunny climate. In the United Kingdom, solar power isn't much use for high-power applications, as you need a large area of solar panels to get a decent amount of power. WIND POWER Wind power is another energy source has been talked

  1. Lay People

    the Crown court but can also sit in a Coroners or high court.. Indictable and the more seriouse Triable either way offences are heard at the crown court so a larger representation of society is needed in the courtroom to make sure there are no mistakes.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    the parties in the form of a notation, a covenant not to sue, or by rescission or substitution of another instrument or obligation. For example, where the holder of a note agreed to accept a conveyance of a house and certain acts by the maker in payment of the note, the instrument was discharged.

  1. prisoners rights

    On top of all, there is the undoubted right of speedy trial of under trial prisoners. These consist of ordering for release on bail where trial is protracted. In Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee representing under trial Prisoners v.

  2. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    the knowledge of a person; in circumstances where it would be unfair where that information to be disclosed to others7 The law of confidence has attracted judicial intervention over the years, but in particular the development of confidence outside of commercial information has been slow.

  1. Recognition of States and

    Charter or the respect paid to such matters as the rule of law, democratic principles and human rights. These are not criteria for recognition in international law however, but rather preconditions of a political nature that have been formulated with a view to the commencement of relations between states.

  2. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    Alternatively, a High Court judge may issue a voluntary bill of indictment in exceptional circumstances. In the case of serious fraud, or sexual offence cases involving children, the prosecution may send a case directly to the Crown Court. Acquittal, in criminal law, judicial discharge of the accused.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work