• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Case study - Italian anarchists Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were arrested near Boston in 1920 and charged with the murder of a shoe factory paymaster and the guard of the factory.

Extracts from this document...


Michael Hennessy 4/6/03 Case Report AP US History II Italian anarchists Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were arrested near Boston in 1920 and charged with the murder of a shoe factory paymaster and the guard of the factory. Frederick Parmenter and the guard were carrying $16,000 in payroll money for the South Braintree shoe factory on April 15, 1920. They were attacked, robbed, and shot. The two killers escaped in a getaway car. A similar crime was committed in the nearby town of Bridgewater four months earlier. Bridgewater police chief arrested Sacco and Vanzetti, who were two poor Italian immigrants, and anarchists. Vanzetti was indicted for the Bridgewater robbery attempt. Frederick Katzmann, the district attorney who had interrogated the two men, prosecuted him. Vanzetti wouldn't testify at his trial. The prosecution's case was based on eyewitness testimony. The descriptions of the witnesses were a rough match of Vanzetti. Despite an alibi backed up by several witnesses that he was selling eels during the Christmas Eve robbery attempt, the jury found Vanzetti guilty of attempted robbery and attempted murder on July 1, 1920. Judge Webster Thayer gave him 12 to 15 years in prison. ...read more.


The textbook he used was a pro-evolutionary book, though it had several modifications from the Darwinian theory. The case brought national attention. William Jennings Bryan was strongly against the theory of evolution. Clarence Darrow, considered by many to be an atheist, was the most famous trial lawyer in America. He offered his services to defend Scopes. The trial began on July 10, 1925. Judge John T. Raulston oversaw the case. The courtroom was filled with reporters, microphones, and film cameras. All but one of the jurors were church members, and most of them were uneducated farmers. The prosecution's case was brief. The defense's case was built around expert testimony on evolutionary theory, but the jury was not present during the defense's case. Darrow then called Bryan to the stand to ask his view on evolution. This lasted for two hours before Raulston stopped the interrogation; the jury never heard a word of the testimony. Scopes was found guilty, and Raulston fined him the bare minimum of $100 dollars. This was a violation of state law that required the jury to decide the amount. ...read more.


Though he did believe both men were disturbed, they were not insane by legal standards. Darrow realized the pressure that would be placed on the jury to execute the men. He wanted their fate to be decided by a judge. The defense sought to bring before the court, as mitigating circumstances, the boys' social maladjustment and mental illness. Leopold's parents had sent him to an all-female school as a child, in a misguided attempt to overcome his shyness around girls. This had the opposite effect. Loeb, like Leopold, was a precocious but emotionally unstable youth. The victim, Bobby Franks, was more or less chosen at random. Their idea was to kidnap the child of a wealthy family and demand a ransom. The money was to be thrown off a moving train at a designated point. The boys reluctantly concluded that the only way to avoid detection was to kill their victim, so he could provide no clues to the authorities. Darrow's closing statement spanned three days. Darrow's speech made a tremendous public impression. Judge Caverly took two weeks to prepare his decision. He was finally ready on September 10, 1924. In front of a packed courtroom he announced that he had decided against execution and sentenced the defendants instead to life imprisonment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Should Capital Punishment be enforced

    This quote extends itself to a long history regarding Jesus going through a public execution of being nailed onto a cross, a form of capital punishment. Therefore, people believe that others should be able to receive similar punishments. Another more recent quote from the bible is from the new testimony,

  2. Should guns be banned in America?

    shot dead in a robbery stepped in front of her killers to save her daughter, said her husband."

  1. Discuss the persuasive techniques used by Michael Moore in three scenes from his film ...

    The effect of the posters displaying unity and the visuals allow us to humanely connect with the scene and the individuals as Moore allows the observer to come to their own conclusion on their stance. The irony of the Wonderful World song is another example of satirical humor and indirectly


    These limitations were referred to as 'caps' and they effectively reduced the amount of compensation available to an aggrieved party.20 Secondly, review panels were established to screen claims prior to their hearing in court. This had the potential to cut litigation costs and time.21 Thirdly, and to similar effect, arbitration bodies were established to provide fast results for negligence claims.


    Objections are often based on assumptions about the personalities, attitudes and believes of potential jurors which legal professionals think they influence their judgment about the defendant. Lawyers, in common with many other people, tend to rely on implicit personality theories and cultural stereotypes in order to form their impressions of others.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    The bank contended wrongful dishonor of a check of a corporation does not give a cause of action for damages to officers and shareholders of the corporation. The trial court held for Kendall, and bank appealed. Decision and Rationale: The appellate court held that the bank was liable to the

  1. On 5th May, 1920, Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were arrested and interviewed about the ...

    The prosecution made a great deal of the fact that all those called to provide evidence to support these alibis were Italian immigrants. Vanzetti and Sacco were disadvantaged by not having a full grasp of the English language. It was clear from some of the answers they gave in court that they had misunderstood the question.

  2. Evaluation of Murder

    A possible reform would be to pass legislation setting out the situation where a duty exists. However, it would be difficult to come up with a definitive list. The law commission report in 1993 suggests only omissions would count in serious offences against a person.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work