• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Case study - Italian anarchists Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were arrested near Boston in 1920 and charged with the murder of a shoe factory paymaster and the guard of the factory.

Extracts from this document...


Michael Hennessy 4/6/03 Case Report AP US History II Italian anarchists Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were arrested near Boston in 1920 and charged with the murder of a shoe factory paymaster and the guard of the factory. Frederick Parmenter and the guard were carrying $16,000 in payroll money for the South Braintree shoe factory on April 15, 1920. They were attacked, robbed, and shot. The two killers escaped in a getaway car. A similar crime was committed in the nearby town of Bridgewater four months earlier. Bridgewater police chief arrested Sacco and Vanzetti, who were two poor Italian immigrants, and anarchists. Vanzetti was indicted for the Bridgewater robbery attempt. Frederick Katzmann, the district attorney who had interrogated the two men, prosecuted him. Vanzetti wouldn't testify at his trial. The prosecution's case was based on eyewitness testimony. The descriptions of the witnesses were a rough match of Vanzetti. Despite an alibi backed up by several witnesses that he was selling eels during the Christmas Eve robbery attempt, the jury found Vanzetti guilty of attempted robbery and attempted murder on July 1, 1920. Judge Webster Thayer gave him 12 to 15 years in prison. ...read more.


The textbook he used was a pro-evolutionary book, though it had several modifications from the Darwinian theory. The case brought national attention. William Jennings Bryan was strongly against the theory of evolution. Clarence Darrow, considered by many to be an atheist, was the most famous trial lawyer in America. He offered his services to defend Scopes. The trial began on July 10, 1925. Judge John T. Raulston oversaw the case. The courtroom was filled with reporters, microphones, and film cameras. All but one of the jurors were church members, and most of them were uneducated farmers. The prosecution's case was brief. The defense's case was built around expert testimony on evolutionary theory, but the jury was not present during the defense's case. Darrow then called Bryan to the stand to ask his view on evolution. This lasted for two hours before Raulston stopped the interrogation; the jury never heard a word of the testimony. Scopes was found guilty, and Raulston fined him the bare minimum of $100 dollars. This was a violation of state law that required the jury to decide the amount. ...read more.


Though he did believe both men were disturbed, they were not insane by legal standards. Darrow realized the pressure that would be placed on the jury to execute the men. He wanted their fate to be decided by a judge. The defense sought to bring before the court, as mitigating circumstances, the boys' social maladjustment and mental illness. Leopold's parents had sent him to an all-female school as a child, in a misguided attempt to overcome his shyness around girls. This had the opposite effect. Loeb, like Leopold, was a precocious but emotionally unstable youth. The victim, Bobby Franks, was more or less chosen at random. Their idea was to kidnap the child of a wealthy family and demand a ransom. The money was to be thrown off a moving train at a designated point. The boys reluctantly concluded that the only way to avoid detection was to kill their victim, so he could provide no clues to the authorities. Darrow's closing statement spanned three days. Darrow's speech made a tremendous public impression. Judge Caverly took two weeks to prepare his decision. He was finally ready on September 10, 1924. In front of a packed courtroom he announced that he had decided against execution and sentenced the defendants instead to life imprisonment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Should Capital Punishment be enforced

    to eighty percent of the Americans also continue to support capital punishment. This can be backed up by religious beliefs, justice, deterrence and the costs involved. The holy bible which many people read daily as part of their religion is known for its conflicting opinions on the death sentence.

  2. Discuss the persuasive techniques used by Michael Moore in three scenes from his film ...

    The effect of the posters displaying unity and the visuals allow us to humanely connect with the scene and the individuals as Moore allows the observer to come to their own conclusion on their stance. The irony of the Wonderful World song is another example of satirical humor and indirectly


    It is expressed by judges to respond to their perceptions of the requirement of justice, fairness and reasonableness in their society.22 In this way, Tort law most certainly does not fall behind social development. Rather it permits its progress in a steady and reassuring manner.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Where a check is crossed generally or specially, the holder- may add the words 'not negotiable'. (iv) Where a check is crossed specially, the- banker to whom it is crossed -may again cross it especially to another banker as his agent for collection.

  1. On 5th May, 1920, Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were arrested and interviewed about the ...

    The prosecution made a great deal of the fact that all those called to provide evidence to support these alibis were Italian immigrants. Vanzetti and Sacco were disadvantaged by not having a full grasp of the English language. It was clear from some of the answers they gave in court that they had misunderstood the question.


    selected would form the jury, there are procedures by which objections may be made to a limited number of potential individual jurors. In the UK these are called peremptory challenges, whilst in the USA the process is called voir dire and has become a significant feature in the run up to a trial.

  1. Evaluation of Murder

    A possible reform would be to pass legislation setting out the situation where a duty exists. However, it would be difficult to come up with a definitive list. The law commission report in 1993 suggests only omissions would count in serious offences against a person.

  2. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    At the end of the evidence, counsel may argue any remaining legal points before the judge (arguments as to the admissibility of evidence having been dealt with as they arose) and then (prosecution first) make their closing speeches to the jury.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work