• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Citizenship Questions on Human Rights and Laws

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Citizenship (A/A*) ________________ Human Rights Why is the Human Rights Act important? Many of the rights that are listed in the Human Rights Act were guaranteed in the United Kingdom before the Act was passed in 1998. They had been accepted in this country for many years. The Human Rights Act brought all of these rights together into one document for the first time. This meant that people could see much more easily what their rights actually were. The Human Rights Act also made the European Convention of Human Rights part of the law of the United Kingdom. This meant that people could take organisations, and even the government, to the European Court of Human Rights if they believed that their rights had been disregarded. Until then, it had been very expensive to pursue a legal; case about human rights in the law courts. Now, judges in the law courts can decide whether human rights have been ignored. ...read more.


Because it is a pressure groups with no allegiance to any governmental or official organisation, Amnesty International can work in much more direct ways. Therefore, it uses the press, television and any available means to publicise abuses and to try to shame governments into changing their policies. Examiner's Hint: Amnesty International is staffed mostly by volunteers. Why Laws are needed Why do societies have laws? Laws are the rules of society. The population of the United Kingdom is made up of many people from different cultures. They have different beliefs and traditions which may conflict. Laws set out common standards of behaviour so that all people know how to behave. Laws, therefore, help to strengthen society and bring people closer together. Laws do not just tell us what we cannot do. Laws also tell us what we are entitled to do. They also tell us our rights. For example, there are laws that control the behaviour of the police. They cannot arrest somebody without a good reason. They cannot search someone's house without a warrant. ...read more.


In civil law, there are winners and losers. How are verdicts reached in a Crown Court? Cases in Crown Courts are contests between the Prosecution and the Defence. Two barristers, one for the crown and one for the defendant, put forward arguments to try to persuade the jury that the accused is either guilty or not guilty. Some people criticise this system because it concentrates on the skill of the barrister rather than the strength of the evidence. It is the judge's role to control the case. He or she must make sure that the barristers do not mislead the jury or act improperly because it is the jury which must take the final decision. Whereas the judge and the barristers are trained lawyers, the members of the jury are not. They are ordinary members of the public. This is an important principle of criminal law. People should be judged by their peers, which means by their equals. Therefore, the decision is reached by ordinary people and not by legal experts. Examiner's Hint: You must understand the roles of the different people in a court. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Identify ONE Human Rights issue and assess the effectiveness of both international and domestic ...

    However, there is already a flaw visible in the legal remedy as protocol is merely optional. This means that a sovereign state becomes a signatory to the protocol at its own discretion. Furthermore, for the protocol's provisions to be binding on signatories, a state is required to follow a process of ratification.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    - Battered wife and her characteristics were: - 1. Extremely immature 2. Attention seeking 3. Explosive personality The first 2 were accepted but the last was a mental state and not provocation. R v Luc Thiet Thuan (1996) - Luc had been taunted by his former girlfriend about the size of his penis.

  1. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    As Feldman15 remarked; 'It is in principle, unacceptable that merely because an individual seeks favourable publicity... his entire life might be laid bare with impunity' HUMAN RIGHTS ACT The HRA 1998 introduced Article 8 and Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights16 into UK law.

  2. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    It's interesting to look at information like this as it allows the reader to get an understanding from a variety of different people from different walks of life. Diane hasn't asked just anybody, she has questioned specific people such as Laurence Lee who was the defence lawyer for Jon Venables

  1. To what extent has the Human Rights Act 1998 strengthened the rule of law ...

    This case concisely shows that English courts, applying a substantive theory of the rule, and adopting customary international human rights law. Of relevance to this issue, Section 3 of the HRA has now licensed the courts to interpret existing legislation in such a way to give effect to the ECHR in existing legislation.

  2. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    To further illustrate the importance of property rights, we must look at the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. The Fifth Amendment protects the individual from public seizure of private property, it reads, "No

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    it is not usually presented for acceptance before due date. The Shah Jog Hundi in its inception is a Hundi which passes from hand to hand by delivery and requires no endorsement, until it reaches the shah who after making inquiries to secure himself should present it to the drawee for acceptance or payment.

  2. Lay People

    District judges sit alone in the courts but they still have the same powers as a bench of lay magistrates. To be a Lay magistrate you must be between the ages of 18 and 65 when appointed and live within 15 miles of Magistrates court you wish to preside in.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work