• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific LawAmericans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific Law Americans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific. America was founded on principles of scientific law. But these principles have now been submerged in today's legal system. What is taught today as law is political law. To understand the difference between a scientific legal system and a political one, it is necessary to know that scientific law developed in the absence of any legislature or Congress or Parliament whatever. Scientific Jurisprudence. Fifteen centuries ago the Roman Empire had collapsed. In many places there was no law and no courts. Whenever two individuals had a dispute, they had to work it out on their own. Before scientific law, disputes often led to mayhem, brawls, or worse. Gradually, however, justice was established by scientific law. The private, scientific law courts had no government force at their disposal. The Sheriff served the due process of the law. He was not a law-enforcer. The scientific law courts were private courts that were supported by the fees charged to litigants. People paid because the scientific law courts provided a useful service. People consented to the due process of the scientific law to have its protection and justice. ...read more.

Middle

were so many books as those on law exported to the colonies." A British general trying to govern America in the 1700s complained that Americans were impossible to buffalo; they were all lawyers. These were the people who gave the world the great American Declaration of Independence. Political Law Political law is the opposite of common law. Based on political power -- brute force -- not on the two fundamental maxims. It is crude and primitive. It has no requirement for logic or morality. It changes whenever the political wind changes. Fickle and tangled; no one can completely understand it. Political law is also known as feudal or civil law. Democracy or dictatorship, it doesn't matter; political law is arbitrary. You do whatever the power holders say, or else. Right or wrong, it commands obedience. This is why majority rule is mob rule. The majority is as ill a ruler as any dictator. Like the dictator, they do not necessarily vote for what is right; they vote for what they want. Their wants change constantly, so political power destroys a man's ability to plan ahead. James Madison asked in the `Federalist Papers', "What prudent merchant will hazard his fortunes in any new branch of commerce when he knows not that his plans may be rendered unlawful before they can be executed?" ...read more.

Conclusion

Says Arthur R. Hogue in `Origins of the Common Law', "The common law is marked by a doctrine of the supremacy of law ... All agencies of government must act upon established principles ... The king, like his subjects, was under the law." Government control of the education of the young, of the school system, causes a "chilling" effect on teaching what we and our families need to know about our heritage of scientific law in order to preserve freedom. Teachers and textbook publishers fear to mention anything that the bureaucrats who control budgets and hiring and firing might disfavor. Any serious criticism of government is omitted from the student's lessons. Vital knowledge about law, our heritage, and the history of the struggle for liberty and justice are not passed on to the next generation. Our Common House is in a shambles. The roof leaks and the foundations are rotting. We have no choice. It is our fate that we must interrupt our pleasures and private pursuits and join with others to study the common law to learn how to restore the House. Otherwise, a cold, cold wind will soon blow in on us and we shall be more unsheltered beneath every political storm that arises than we already are until finally we shall live in misery in a complete ruin. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    COA rejected appeal. R v Baille (1995) - The provocative action was directed at his son. Baille went after a drug dealer who had threatened his son. He drove to the victims house which was about 30 minutes away and then chased the victim for about 15 minutes before catching him.

  2. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    One judgment at first instance has been traced in England holding that it is the standard of a reasonable child of defendants age which should be adopted to govern the liability of the child. 2.Other categories of persons It is unclear to what extent if at all the standard of

  1. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    By their definition as wayward "insiders," heretics, however, evoked a different response. Their insidious proximity to the dominant faith created a dangerous instability that demanded resolution, not complacency or tolerance. Typically, that resolution took one of two forms: the heretic was either reassimilated into the fold or altogether driven from

  2. LAW OF TORTS II

    C O N C L U S I O N The law, in particular the law of torts, is extremely well positioned to tackle the demands of society. Tort law has proven, through the Ipp Report and common law judgment, that it can respond to issues in society that act as barriers for development.

  1. To what extent has the Human Rights Act 1998 strengthened the rule of law ...

    (which contain substantive rights), does perhaps show some hesitancy in fully pursuing the substantive view.14 UK constitution and HRA The UK has no codified written constitution. Instead, it has relied open the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty as the bedrock of its constitutional arrangement.

  2. Inconsistent to draw up the relationship between common law and equity, we firstly have ...

    Besides that contrary with common law, equity recognises trust and mortgages. Equity recognises and enforce the rights of the beneficiary. While for mortgages, equity provides a means 'equity of redemption' which gave the mortgagor the right to redeem the property after the set date provided certain formalities are complied with.

  1. Common Law and Equity

    The Court of Chancery succeeded in stopping unconscionable writs through the injunction, by which the common law claimant was restrained from continuing his action. 5.0 Conflicts between common law and equity The two systems that were operating (common law and equity)

  2. Justices of the Peace - Magistrates Courts

    Assessment Judicial confidence in the accuracy of jury verdicts is very high: Lord Salmon estimated in 1974 that no more than about two per cent of those brought to trial are wrongly acquitted by the jury, and Lord Elwyn-Jones LC said he could remember only one case in which he had doubts about a jury conviction.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work