• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific LawAmericans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific Law Americans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific. America was founded on principles of scientific law. But these principles have now been submerged in today's legal system. What is taught today as law is political law. To understand the difference between a scientific legal system and a political one, it is necessary to know that scientific law developed in the absence of any legislature or Congress or Parliament whatever. Scientific Jurisprudence. Fifteen centuries ago the Roman Empire had collapsed. In many places there was no law and no courts. Whenever two individuals had a dispute, they had to work it out on their own. Before scientific law, disputes often led to mayhem, brawls, or worse. Gradually, however, justice was established by scientific law. The private, scientific law courts had no government force at their disposal. The Sheriff served the due process of the law. He was not a law-enforcer. The scientific law courts were private courts that were supported by the fees charged to litigants. People paid because the scientific law courts provided a useful service. People consented to the due process of the scientific law to have its protection and justice. ...read more.

Middle

were so many books as those on law exported to the colonies." A British general trying to govern America in the 1700s complained that Americans were impossible to buffalo; they were all lawyers. These were the people who gave the world the great American Declaration of Independence. Political Law Political law is the opposite of common law. Based on political power -- brute force -- not on the two fundamental maxims. It is crude and primitive. It has no requirement for logic or morality. It changes whenever the political wind changes. Fickle and tangled; no one can completely understand it. Political law is also known as feudal or civil law. Democracy or dictatorship, it doesn't matter; political law is arbitrary. You do whatever the power holders say, or else. Right or wrong, it commands obedience. This is why majority rule is mob rule. The majority is as ill a ruler as any dictator. Like the dictator, they do not necessarily vote for what is right; they vote for what they want. Their wants change constantly, so political power destroys a man's ability to plan ahead. James Madison asked in the `Federalist Papers', "What prudent merchant will hazard his fortunes in any new branch of commerce when he knows not that his plans may be rendered unlawful before they can be executed?" ...read more.

Conclusion

Says Arthur R. Hogue in `Origins of the Common Law', "The common law is marked by a doctrine of the supremacy of law ... All agencies of government must act upon established principles ... The king, like his subjects, was under the law." Government control of the education of the young, of the school system, causes a "chilling" effect on teaching what we and our families need to know about our heritage of scientific law in order to preserve freedom. Teachers and textbook publishers fear to mention anything that the bureaucrats who control budgets and hiring and firing might disfavor. Any serious criticism of government is omitted from the student's lessons. Vital knowledge about law, our heritage, and the history of the struggle for liberty and justice are not passed on to the next generation. Our Common House is in a shambles. The roof leaks and the foundations are rotting. We have no choice. It is our fate that we must interrupt our pleasures and private pursuits and join with others to study the common law to learn how to restore the House. Otherwise, a cold, cold wind will soon blow in on us and we shall be more unsheltered beneath every political storm that arises than we already are until finally we shall live in misery in a complete ruin. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    the provocation direction, despite it being overruled by the statute This was bad news for women and a male dominant description of the defence became apparent. Characteristically men are prone to act in this way, whereas women are likely to pick their moment to kill.

  2. civil law, criminal law and habeas corpus

    local forces has survived, in spite of strong pressures for more centralization. In some countries, the national police force is supplemented or paralleled by regional or local bodies, or by groups set up for particular purposes such as riot control, serious crime detection (for example, the US Federal Bureau of Investigation, or FBI), and other tasks such as traffic control.

  1. Describe the system of trial by jury within the English legal system.

    can be presented and discussed, and lastly there would be a quicker decision made because they are more knowledgeable, experienced, and legally representative than a jury. The disadvantages of trial by a panel of judges are; its a lot more expensive because three judges would have to be paid, where

  2. Lay People

    The system also involves members of the local community as Magistrates can only sit in there local courts. This means that some magistrates will have a better understanding of the area they are working in and will have a

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    When there are several drawees (who are not partners), refusal by any one of the drawees will amount to dishonor. 2. When presentment for acceptance is excused and the bill remains unaccepted. 3. When tile drawee is incompetent to contract.

  2. LAW OF TORTS II

    80s to through to the late 90s was one not dissimilar to that of the Australian experience prior to the reform of 2002 . It seemed a shift in the traditional doctor-patient relationship had occurred. Patients began to demand explanations for their ailments and to question the ability of their

  1. In the context of the theoretical proposition on the issue of law and morality, ...

    the chief reason.13 In the case of Pretty v United Kingdom, Pretty tries to overturn British euthanasia law using the Human Rights Act, Mrs Pretty's QC alleged she was facing a humiliating and degrading death which would be "distressing and undignified".

  2. Types of Court in the English Legal System.

    Teesside Crown court. The Crown Court also operates a tier system for its external centers that dictates the kind of work they are allowed to do. There are three tries of the Crown Court. The first tier deals with High Court civil matters, any kind of triable either way or indictable criminal offence and hears appeals from Magistrates Courts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work