• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific LawAmericans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific Law Americans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific. America was founded on principles of scientific law. But these principles have now been submerged in today's legal system. What is taught today as law is political law. To understand the difference between a scientific legal system and a political one, it is necessary to know that scientific law developed in the absence of any legislature or Congress or Parliament whatever. Scientific Jurisprudence. Fifteen centuries ago the Roman Empire had collapsed. In many places there was no law and no courts. Whenever two individuals had a dispute, they had to work it out on their own. Before scientific law, disputes often led to mayhem, brawls, or worse. Gradually, however, justice was established by scientific law. The private, scientific law courts had no government force at their disposal. The Sheriff served the due process of the law. He was not a law-enforcer. The scientific law courts were private courts that were supported by the fees charged to litigants. People paid because the scientific law courts provided a useful service. People consented to the due process of the scientific law to have its protection and justice. ...read more.

Middle

were so many books as those on law exported to the colonies." A British general trying to govern America in the 1700s complained that Americans were impossible to buffalo; they were all lawyers. These were the people who gave the world the great American Declaration of Independence. Political Law Political law is the opposite of common law. Based on political power -- brute force -- not on the two fundamental maxims. It is crude and primitive. It has no requirement for logic or morality. It changes whenever the political wind changes. Fickle and tangled; no one can completely understand it. Political law is also known as feudal or civil law. Democracy or dictatorship, it doesn't matter; political law is arbitrary. You do whatever the power holders say, or else. Right or wrong, it commands obedience. This is why majority rule is mob rule. The majority is as ill a ruler as any dictator. Like the dictator, they do not necessarily vote for what is right; they vote for what they want. Their wants change constantly, so political power destroys a man's ability to plan ahead. James Madison asked in the `Federalist Papers', "What prudent merchant will hazard his fortunes in any new branch of commerce when he knows not that his plans may be rendered unlawful before they can be executed?" ...read more.

Conclusion

Says Arthur R. Hogue in `Origins of the Common Law', "The common law is marked by a doctrine of the supremacy of law ... All agencies of government must act upon established principles ... The king, like his subjects, was under the law." Government control of the education of the young, of the school system, causes a "chilling" effect on teaching what we and our families need to know about our heritage of scientific law in order to preserve freedom. Teachers and textbook publishers fear to mention anything that the bureaucrats who control budgets and hiring and firing might disfavor. Any serious criticism of government is omitted from the student's lessons. Vital knowledge about law, our heritage, and the history of the struggle for liberty and justice are not passed on to the next generation. Our Common House is in a shambles. The roof leaks and the foundations are rotting. We have no choice. It is our fate that we must interrupt our pleasures and private pursuits and join with others to study the common law to learn how to restore the House. Otherwise, a cold, cold wind will soon blow in on us and we shall be more unsheltered beneath every political storm that arises than we already are until finally we shall live in misery in a complete ruin. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    It would be unwise however to assume in the absence of decided cases that subjective factories are to be taken into account in the case of classes of persons other than children and mentally disordered persons. In Daly v Liverpool corporation5 it was held that in deciding whether a 67

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Byrne's conviction for murder was substituted for voluntary manslaughter. R v Lloyd (1976) - He murdered the victim saying he was suffering form uncontrollable impulses Found guilty of murder but appealed on the judge misdirecting the jury but saying "totally irresistible impulses" which related to insanity COA said "there doesn't

  1. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    As Feldman15 remarked; 'It is in principle, unacceptable that merely because an individual seeks favourable publicity... his entire life might be laid bare with impunity' HUMAN RIGHTS ACT The HRA 1998 introduced Article 8 and Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights16 into UK law.

  2. LAW OF TORTS II

    US reform came in two waves. This section of the study will outline four ways in which the US was able to reform the law and in turn assist the development of society. Firstly, similar to the Australian model, amendments to legislation were enacted to limit the award of damages.

  1. The Rule of Law is a doctrine that, when followed within a State, provides ...

    public body.3 This is another factor, which shows that the Rule of Law guarantees equality before the law and so makes sure that all will be subject to it. However there is also evidence of the Rule of Law in the UK not ensuring that all are subject to it.

  2. Is there a tort of invasion of privacy?

    action based upon a new tort involving the infringement of privacy" was a "vexed question" which was not necessary for first instance judges to tackle when considering applications for injunctions.11 This issue has been avoided in a great number of high profile cases which have been described in the media

  1. Inconsistent to draw up the relationship between common law and equity, we firstly have ...

    When the Judicature Act 1973-1975 have been passed, it has changed the basic structure of our court today.

  2. In the context of the theoretical proposition on the issue of law and morality, ...

    the chief reason.13 In the case of Pretty v United Kingdom, Pretty tries to overturn British euthanasia law using the Human Rights Act, Mrs Pretty's QC alleged she was facing a humiliating and degrading death which would be "distressing and undignified".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work