• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific LawAmericans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific Law Americans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific. America was founded on principles of scientific law. But these principles have now been submerged in today's legal system. What is taught today as law is political law. To understand the difference between a scientific legal system and a political one, it is necessary to know that scientific law developed in the absence of any legislature or Congress or Parliament whatever. Scientific Jurisprudence. Fifteen centuries ago the Roman Empire had collapsed. In many places there was no law and no courts. Whenever two individuals had a dispute, they had to work it out on their own. Before scientific law, disputes often led to mayhem, brawls, or worse. Gradually, however, justice was established by scientific law. The private, scientific law courts had no government force at their disposal. The Sheriff served the due process of the law. He was not a law-enforcer. The scientific law courts were private courts that were supported by the fees charged to litigants. People paid because the scientific law courts provided a useful service. People consented to the due process of the scientific law to have its protection and justice. ...read more.

Middle

were so many books as those on law exported to the colonies." A British general trying to govern America in the 1700s complained that Americans were impossible to buffalo; they were all lawyers. These were the people who gave the world the great American Declaration of Independence. Political Law Political law is the opposite of common law. Based on political power -- brute force -- not on the two fundamental maxims. It is crude and primitive. It has no requirement for logic or morality. It changes whenever the political wind changes. Fickle and tangled; no one can completely understand it. Political law is also known as feudal or civil law. Democracy or dictatorship, it doesn't matter; political law is arbitrary. You do whatever the power holders say, or else. Right or wrong, it commands obedience. This is why majority rule is mob rule. The majority is as ill a ruler as any dictator. Like the dictator, they do not necessarily vote for what is right; they vote for what they want. Their wants change constantly, so political power destroys a man's ability to plan ahead. James Madison asked in the `Federalist Papers', "What prudent merchant will hazard his fortunes in any new branch of commerce when he knows not that his plans may be rendered unlawful before they can be executed?" ...read more.

Conclusion

Says Arthur R. Hogue in `Origins of the Common Law', "The common law is marked by a doctrine of the supremacy of law ... All agencies of government must act upon established principles ... The king, like his subjects, was under the law." Government control of the education of the young, of the school system, causes a "chilling" effect on teaching what we and our families need to know about our heritage of scientific law in order to preserve freedom. Teachers and textbook publishers fear to mention anything that the bureaucrats who control budgets and hiring and firing might disfavor. Any serious criticism of government is omitted from the student's lessons. Vital knowledge about law, our heritage, and the history of the struggle for liberty and justice are not passed on to the next generation. Our Common House is in a shambles. The roof leaks and the foundations are rotting. We have no choice. It is our fate that we must interrupt our pleasures and private pursuits and join with others to study the common law to learn how to restore the House. Otherwise, a cold, cold wind will soon blow in on us and we shall be more unsheltered beneath every political storm that arises than we already are until finally we shall live in misery in a complete ruin. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    It would be unwise however to assume in the absence of decided cases that subjective factories are to be taken into account in the case of classes of persons other than children and mentally disordered persons. In Daly v Liverpool corporation5 it was held that in deciding whether a 67

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    The law allows the defendant to plea diminished responsibility OR intoxication, but not both. Alcohol and drugs can not make the defence of diminished responsibility more effective. R v Gittens (1984) - Gittens was suffering from depression and also heavily drunk.

  1. To what extent has the Human Rights Act 1998 strengthened the rule of law ...

    discriminates on the ground of nationality or immigration status" by justifying detention without trial for foreign suspects, but not Britons.18 The Home Secretary had ordered the detention of foreign nationals under Sections 21 and 23 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001.19 The Act, amended in light of the

  2. Inconsistent to draw up the relationship between common law and equity, we firstly have ...

    The couple knew about the builders were having financial difficulties. Later, the builders sued the couple for the balance of the payment, but the couple appealed that the court should grant promissory estoppel to make promises binding thou there are not, about the builders have consented to accept the amount paid by them.

  1. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    For example the case of X v Y13, dealt with issues relating to confidence within health authorities. The issue of privacy has always been extensively attached to celebrities and role models, and courts have constantly been in a battle trying to draw a line between privacy and freedom of expression.

  2. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    US patent law has a long history, dating back to 1790. The original patent law was a primitive one, but we see the importance of this idea simply through the fact that the framers of the Constitution would think to include such a clause.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    When there are several drawees (who are not partners), refusal by any one of the drawees will amount to dishonor. 2. When presentment for acceptance is excused and the bill remains unaccepted. 3. When tile drawee is incompetent to contract.

  2. Is there a tort of invasion of privacy?

    needs and the Court of Appeal has recently referred with apparent approval to the "development of a new civil right of privacy".10 However, in a later case a differently constituted court refused to deal with the point. It was stated that whether or not there is "a separate cause of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work