• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Constitutionalism is a body of theory which prescribes what the constitution must do. The

Extracts from this document...


Constitutionalism is a body of theory which prescribes what the constitution must do. The judiciary works to solve disputes between parties and the disputes may come either as criminal cases or civil cases. The judiciary works as the over-site to the executive and the legislature. It gives orders to parties in disputes found wrong in order to represent communities basic values. The judiciary is set up in a form of a hierarchy of courts and it is within these courts that the judiciary exercises its authority. The hierarchy starts with the Constitutional Court, which is the court of final instance in relation to constitutional matters. The Supreme Court Of Appeal which functions as the appellate court in respect of non-constitutional matters and matters involving the developing of the common law. It also has jurisdiction to hear and decide constitutional cases but deals with appeals only. The High Courts have jurisdiction over constitutional cases except matters exclusive within the jurisdiction of Constitutional Courts. This is also respective to the High Courts and Supreme Court of Appeals in non-constitutional matters. ...read more.


SA 391 (cc) is an example of how the judiciary interprets and tests the constitution against itself and the judgement of the previous courts. Two men accused and covicted of murder in the Witswaterand Local Division were sentenced to death. They appealed to the Appeallate Division against the death sentence. The court found S277(1)(a) of the criminal procedure Act 51 of 1997, was in conflict with the constitution of the Republic Of South Africa Act 200 of 1993, under section11 which states, "Everyone has the right to life." The court also based their judgement on section 9 which says, "Everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law." , hence, section 277(1)(a) of the criminal procedure Act 51 of 1997 was deemed invalid. A case which illustrates the courts ability to interpret the law against the constitution and giving a fair judgement is S v Mhlungu and Others 1995 (3) SA 867. The accused had been charged in the Circuit Local Division of the Supreme Court with murder and other crimes, and an indictment served in Afrikaans on the 11th March 1994. ...read more.


to the executive body and legislature, applying law within the courts, making sure every law is consistent with the constitution and that the constitution does not contradict itself. It also has the authority to declare a law invalid and unenforceable but can not strike laws done. It also has a duty to extend the law where it must, which is usually the common law and does so effectively through judicial precedent. It has a duty to make a fair judgement in all cases without any discrimination or fear. It serves as an aid to the legislature to see if laws it has passed in its statutes can be applied in practical law. It works to solve disputes between parties or merely translates the law for ordinary people's understanding. It serves as a body of protection for all people and punishes those in the wrong. It places order within society through effective usage of the law and all concepts of South African constitutionalism affect or are affected by it including itself. Its systems have generally worked well and it is a true change from Apartheid times.. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Judicial precedent.

    3 star(s)

    Cases can also be overruled by an act of parliament. It must be remembered that only higher courts can overrule lower courts. In addition, the House of Lords can overrule the decisions of any court including its own. (Reversing; this is simply an overturning on appeal of the decision of the court below that hearing the appeal.

  2. prisoners rights

    If something could be done to keep the thread of family life unbroken some vices many take care of themselves, as sexual frustration may become tolerable. The aforesaid seems to be a more rational way to deal with prison vices rather than awarding hard punishment to them.

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    - Gave wife a VD. He didn't tell her he had it so there was no deception. Therefore not guilty R v Flattery (1877) - Flattery convinced victim that he was performing a surgical operation. However he was in fact having sexual intercourse. She reports it and he says she consented to it.

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    But the hurdle raised by this "diversitee" is easily overcome, for the sultan soon waves aside his own faith and vows to convert in order to wed Custance. Like Mandeville, whose Saracens may be "lightly converted," the Man of Law stresses the ease with which the sultan comes to terms

  1. Does Hart's theory differ to the 'gunman writ large' situation?

    Raz criticises Hart's Practice Theory of Rules4. In order to come to terms with Raz's critique, we must briefly analyse the reasoning which leads him to his conclusion. Raz begins from the premise that rules are reasons for action. 'The fact that rules are normally stated by using normative terms

  2. "The function of the judiciary within the constitution of the United Kingdom is to ...

    doubt about how far the criminal law extends".7 But there is a developing consensus in academic circles that they are doing quite the opposite, as summarised by Prof. Glanville Williams, that "in criminal cases the courts are anxious to facilitate the conviction of villains, and they interpret the law whenever

  1. Comparative Constitutionalism

    In Santiago, the court analogized the lease contracts to adhesion contracts--contracts between a weaker and a stronger party whereby the stronger party, by virtue of its substantially superior bargaining power, dictates the terms of the agreement. Similarly, while most public housing residents may not relish the idea of giving the

  2. The Role of the ICJ

    There are only two known cases where the states did not comply with the ICJ's judgment. These cases were the Corfu Channel Case and the US-Nicaragua. One possible reason for this was the fact that the ICJ's compliance is on voluntary basis and therefore States can not seek the ICJ's verdict without first accepting the court's verdict beforehand.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work