• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Constitutionalism is a body of theory which prescribes what the constitution must do. The

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Constitutionalism is a body of theory which prescribes what the constitution must do. The judiciary works to solve disputes between parties and the disputes may come either as criminal cases or civil cases. The judiciary works as the over-site to the executive and the legislature. It gives orders to parties in disputes found wrong in order to represent communities basic values. The judiciary is set up in a form of a hierarchy of courts and it is within these courts that the judiciary exercises its authority. The hierarchy starts with the Constitutional Court, which is the court of final instance in relation to constitutional matters. The Supreme Court Of Appeal which functions as the appellate court in respect of non-constitutional matters and matters involving the developing of the common law. It also has jurisdiction to hear and decide constitutional cases but deals with appeals only. The High Courts have jurisdiction over constitutional cases except matters exclusive within the jurisdiction of Constitutional Courts. This is also respective to the High Courts and Supreme Court of Appeals in non-constitutional matters. ...read more.

Middle

SA 391 (cc) is an example of how the judiciary interprets and tests the constitution against itself and the judgement of the previous courts. Two men accused and covicted of murder in the Witswaterand Local Division were sentenced to death. They appealed to the Appeallate Division against the death sentence. The court found S277(1)(a) of the criminal procedure Act 51 of 1997, was in conflict with the constitution of the Republic Of South Africa Act 200 of 1993, under section11 which states, "Everyone has the right to life." The court also based their judgement on section 9 which says, "Everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law." , hence, section 277(1)(a) of the criminal procedure Act 51 of 1997 was deemed invalid. A case which illustrates the courts ability to interpret the law against the constitution and giving a fair judgement is S v Mhlungu and Others 1995 (3) SA 867. The accused had been charged in the Circuit Local Division of the Supreme Court with murder and other crimes, and an indictment served in Afrikaans on the 11th March 1994. ...read more.

Conclusion

to the executive body and legislature, applying law within the courts, making sure every law is consistent with the constitution and that the constitution does not contradict itself. It also has the authority to declare a law invalid and unenforceable but can not strike laws done. It also has a duty to extend the law where it must, which is usually the common law and does so effectively through judicial precedent. It has a duty to make a fair judgement in all cases without any discrimination or fear. It serves as an aid to the legislature to see if laws it has passed in its statutes can be applied in practical law. It works to solve disputes between parties or merely translates the law for ordinary people's understanding. It serves as a body of protection for all people and punishes those in the wrong. It places order within society through effective usage of the law and all concepts of South African constitutionalism affect or are affected by it including itself. Its systems have generally worked well and it is a true change from Apartheid times.. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Judicial precedent.

    3 star(s)

    ( Decisions of commonwealth courts. ( Decisions of Scottish or Irish courts even thought they are not part of the English legal system. (Decisions of courts inferior to that hearing the case. 12. In return to judicial precedent explain the meaning of the following terms; (Distinguish; where the facts of the case before the judge

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    R v Donovan (1934) - He claimed he had consent because he had paid the woman for her sexual services (spanking) Charged with s47 ABH Found guilty and appeals COA set the precedent that "consent was not given as they were not transient or trifling injuries" R v Leach (1969)

  1. Does Hart's theory differ to the 'gunman writ large' situation?

    Hence the command theory is content-independent describing rules as posited by the sovereign. Hart's account is another example, in his case the rules are based on practices. The practice theory of norms is flawed, argues Raz. The practice theory i.e.

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    5), she sets to preaching them the Christian faith. Her instruction is so forceful that in short course the foreign merchants renounce, in Genius's words, their "false goddes" (CA 2.610), convert, and receive baptism. They then return to their land. The episode is brief and aptly summed up in the marginal annotation of Trevet's manuscript (Arundel 56): "conuersio paganorum" (Chron.

  1. "The function of the judiciary within the constitution of the United Kingdom is to ...

    our legal system aspires, that the criminal law must be prospective.6 But precisely because they are dealing with matters affecting the liberty of the individual, the judges are more likely to be cautious about acknowledging too freely their part in a creative process when they mould the criminal law, which makes analysis of what they do the more difficult.

  2. Justices of the Peace - Magistrates Courts

    7500 were tried by the magistrates (and 7200 of them convicted), and 6000 prosecutions were discontinued or charges withdrawn. Magistrates courts also deal with civil actions for the non-payment of council tax and certain other taxes and utility bills, and sit as "youth courts" to deal with young people accused

  1. Contact orders

    Even though the young people are more listened to and decisions taken in their best interests6 the domestic courts must take into account the non resident parents' human rights when deciding the outcome of the case as was held in Somnerfeld v Germany (2003).

  2. Comparative Constitutionalism

    In Santiago, the court analogized the lease contracts to adhesion contracts--contracts between a weaker and a stronger party whereby the stronger party, by virtue of its substantially superior bargaining power, dictates the terms of the agreement. Similarly, while most public housing residents may not relish the idea of giving the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work