• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically consider how the courts have applied the meaning of the term dishonesty in theft and related offences.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A2 LAW - THEFT Critically consider how the courts have applied the meaning of the term dishonesty in theft and related offences. Theft is an offence under section 1 of the Theft Act 1968. The Act states "A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving that other from it..." Section 2 of the Theft Act gives three situations in which appropriation of property is not to be regarded as dishonest; they are as follows. Firstly, where the person believes that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it. Secondly, where the person believes that he would have the other's consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it. Thirdly, where the person believes that taking reasonable steps cannot discover the owner of the property. Section 2 of the Act states that a person's appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest even though he was willing to pay for the property. ...read more.

Middle

This gave a two-stage test to be applied. Was what was done dishonest according to the standards of honest and reasonable people? If so, did the defendant (D) realise that what he was doing was dishonest by those standards? This is left to the jury in each case to decide. For the actus reus of theft, it has to be proved that there was an appropriation of property, which belonged to another, in order to establish liability. The mens rea of theft are dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive another. In McIvor (1982) the Court of Appeal (CoA) sought to reconcile the differences between the subjective and objective tests for dishonesty. It decided that a subjective approach should be taken where the charge was conspiracy to defraud, but that the question of dishonesty in theft should be decided objectively. As this was later rejected by the CoA itself in Ghosh (1982), it shows that the courts themselves are not clear as to what the tests for dishonesty should be. ...read more.

Conclusion

Or even those who believe that ordinary people would regard them as morally justified in their actions? In Small (1988) the defendant claimed that a car he had appropriated had been abandoned by its owner. It had been left in one place for over a week with the keys in the ignition. The jury did not believe his story but his conviction was quashed by the CoA because he had honestly believed that this was the case. It is theft if property is merely removed for spite and is destroyed or thrown away. The uncertainties and loopholes in this area of law could be resolved if a statutory definition of dishonesty is given. In the case of Salvo (1980), the judge felt that it was not always the case that a citizen 'knows dishonesty if he sees it', and that further help was needed in some cases. At present, however, Ghosh does not represent the law on the subject until there is an intervention by either the House of Lords (HoL) or Parliament. Kikelomo Akinyosoye Terry Sweeney-YPA ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    direction on the level of probability New Direction - Nedrick direction "In diffivcult and exceptional cases the jury should be given the following: - "Where death or GBH is not the defendants aim or wish the jury may INFUR intention if they decide that death or GBH was a virtual certainty and the defendant foreseen this was the case."

  2. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    The UK complied very reluctantly, initially designating only 27 "bathing beaches" in the whole country, and has still not fully complied 25 years later. (About 95 per cent of British beaches currently satisfy the criteria, which are about the same as the figure for other member states.)

  1. Human Resource Management at IKEA and Currys.

    The diagram shows how different methods of selection are placed according to accuracy, with 1.0 determining the 'perfect prediction', (Beardwell, J 2007). As this is a prediction of methods, it is a perfect example of assessing which type of criteria a business should follow, for a small company it could

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    12. Bill in acceptor's hand: If a bill which has been negotiated is, at or after maturity, held by the acceptor in his own right, all rights of action thereon are extinguished (Sec. 90). This is the final discharge of the bill, and the principle applies to notes as well.

  1. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    her themselves, or if they think the matter too grave for their powers, they may pass it to the Crown Court, which has power to pass more severe sentences. They should not do so unless there is something that became apparent in the course of the trial which makes the

  2. The essence of the defence of duress by threats is that a defendant would ...

    it is effective to neutralise the will of the accused at that time.' The threat must be imminent but need not be immediate. For example in Flatt (1996) D knew the identity of the man who had threatened him and had a seventeen-hour period in which to contact the authorities.

  1. The Inchoate (Incomplete) Offences - Essay Notes

    - was held that in an article in a revolutionary newspaper encouraging revolutionaries all over the world to assassinate their heads of state, could be an incitement to murder - INVICTA PLASTICS LTD v CLARE (1976) - D's manufactured a device called a Radatec which could detect wireless transmissions,, including

  2. Justices of the Peace - Magistrates Courts

    About 1 per cent of magistrates a removed by the Lord Chancellor, 4 per cent die in office, 35 per cent retire, and 60 per cent resign for work or health or other personal reasons. The Lord Chancellor seeks to ensure that each bench "broadly reflects the community which it serves" insofar as this is possible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work