• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically consider how the courts have applied the meaning of the term dishonesty in theft and related offences.

Extracts from this document...


A2 LAW - THEFT Critically consider how the courts have applied the meaning of the term dishonesty in theft and related offences. Theft is an offence under section 1 of the Theft Act 1968. The Act states "A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving that other from it..." Section 2 of the Theft Act gives three situations in which appropriation of property is not to be regarded as dishonest; they are as follows. Firstly, where the person believes that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it. Secondly, where the person believes that he would have the other's consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it. Thirdly, where the person believes that taking reasonable steps cannot discover the owner of the property. Section 2 of the Act states that a person's appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest even though he was willing to pay for the property. ...read more.


This gave a two-stage test to be applied. Was what was done dishonest according to the standards of honest and reasonable people? If so, did the defendant (D) realise that what he was doing was dishonest by those standards? This is left to the jury in each case to decide. For the actus reus of theft, it has to be proved that there was an appropriation of property, which belonged to another, in order to establish liability. The mens rea of theft are dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive another. In McIvor (1982) the Court of Appeal (CoA) sought to reconcile the differences between the subjective and objective tests for dishonesty. It decided that a subjective approach should be taken where the charge was conspiracy to defraud, but that the question of dishonesty in theft should be decided objectively. As this was later rejected by the CoA itself in Ghosh (1982), it shows that the courts themselves are not clear as to what the tests for dishonesty should be. ...read more.


Or even those who believe that ordinary people would regard them as morally justified in their actions? In Small (1988) the defendant claimed that a car he had appropriated had been abandoned by its owner. It had been left in one place for over a week with the keys in the ignition. The jury did not believe his story but his conviction was quashed by the CoA because he had honestly believed that this was the case. It is theft if property is merely removed for spite and is destroyed or thrown away. The uncertainties and loopholes in this area of law could be resolved if a statutory definition of dishonesty is given. In the case of Salvo (1980), the judge felt that it was not always the case that a citizen 'knows dishonesty if he sees it', and that further help was needed in some cases. At present, however, Ghosh does not represent the law on the subject until there is an intervention by either the House of Lords (HoL) or Parliament. Kikelomo Akinyosoye Terry Sweeney-YPA ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Frightening the victim to death R v Towers (1874) - Towers assaulted a woman carrying a baby (in her arms). Woman screamed and the baby cried to its death (2 weeks later) Guilty of involuntary manslaughter (unlawful act) R v Hayward (1908) - Hayward went home to beat his wife and she ran outside onto the road, collapsed and then he kicked her in the arm.

  2. Justices of the Peace - Magistrates Courts

    to decide whether he should be bailed or remanded in custody pending trial. Statistics for 1997 show that 71 per cent of all offenders were dealt with on their first appearance, 25 per cent were remanded on bail and 4 per cent were remanded in custody.

  1. Human Resource Management at IKEA and Currys.

    The diagram shows how different methods of selection are placed according to accuracy, with 1.0 determining the 'perfect prediction', (Beardwell, J 2007). As this is a prediction of methods, it is a perfect example of assessing which type of criteria a business should follow, for a small company it could

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    A Darshni Hundi payable on demand must be presented for payment within a reasonable time after its receipt by the holder. Any loss caused to the drawer by delay in presentment falls on the party at fault. * Muddati or Miyadi Hundi A Hundi payable after a specified period of

  1. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    case more serious; if it is apparent from the start, they should send the case to Crown Court for trial. If magistrates cannot or decline to hear the case, or the defendant chooses a jury trial, the magistrates must examine the evidence to see whether there is a case to answer.

  2. The Inchoate (Incomplete) Offences - Essay Notes

    The fact that the company's advertisement did point out that o do so would be an offence did not prevent liability being incurred. - R v GOLDMAN (2001) - D had seen an advertisement in a magazine for the sale of pornographic videos of children.

  1. Irish cases which discuss the meaning of intention

    Lord Hailsham adopted the definition of intention laid down by Asquith L.J. in the civil case of Cunliffe v Goodman: "An 'intention', to my mind, connotes a state of affairs which the party 'intending'...does more than merely contemplate. It connotes a state of affairs which, on the contrary, he decides,

  2. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    Where a witness has purely formal evidence to give, which is not disputed by the defence, his deposition from the committal hearing may be accepted in lieu of oral evidence. At the end of the prosecution's case, the defence may submit there is "no case to answer"; if the judge

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work