• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically discuss different possible meanings of justice and explore the relationship between law and justice.

Extracts from this document...


Critically discuss different possible meanings of justice and explore the relationship between law and justice. "The law" has been described by Sir John Salmond as "a body of principles recognised and applied by the state in the administration of justice". Whereas John Austin defined law as a command issued from a sovereign power to an inferior and enforced coercion". Laws apply are compulsory and must be followed by all members of society, for example, the Offences Against the Person Act (1861) applied to and for everyone. Parliament creates laws and the laws are enforced by official bodies, such as the police. Non-compliance with laws can results in punishment, such as imprisonment, fines etc. "Justice" can be defined in basic terms as "fairness" and "equality". To define it elaborately would be difficult due to the fact that people perceive it in various ways. "Distributive justice" was put for by Aristotle between people within society. He believed that justice is achieved through rewarding people on their merit and contribution to society. So for example, if you're a hard worker, it would be unfair for you to be given the same amount of a indolent worker, such as pensioners - who work and pay full for 30 years to receive a full state pension. ...read more.


The relationship between law and justice can be assessed by looking at the distinction between "Procedural" law and "substantive" law. Procedural law is the way in which laws are made and operate and the extent to which they achieve justice. One example of procedural justice is natural law itself. This has two basic principles of justice; hearing has to be impartial, it cannot be bias. For example, in the Pinochet case, Pinochet was the Chilean dictator who was subject to appeal at the House of Lords by the Human Right Organisation Amnesty International who wanted Pinochet extradited to Spain to face human rights charges. However, one of the law lords hearing the case was Lord Hoffman, whose wife was director of A.I, so a new hearing had to be ordered because this was considered bias. The second principle is the fact that the D has to be heard. For example, in Ridge V Baldwin, a chief constable was dismissed without being allowed to give his side of the case. The decision was then overturned, because he should have been given a right to. This then makes the process fair. The social justice theorist Rawls would have supported natural law. He believed that everyone should be entitles to a right to fair trial, and that this was the important part. ...read more.


there being close ties of love and affecting and the direct perception of sight and sound of the incident, which were designed to limit liability. It can be said that this is unfair, because in this case, loved ones had to see their loved ones crushed to death etc on television from the Hillsborough disaster, but they still couldn't claim. However, it can be argued that these control mechanisms are put forward to limit liability, thus keeping the floodgates of litigation closed so that not everyone that claims will be able to sue. Utilitarianists view of society is that we should encourage public benefit, which in this case, would be closing the floodgates, whereas on the other hand, Aristotle in respect of corrective justice woul disagree with this due to the fact the victim would not have received anything in return. No would be no correction of loss the have sufferent. In conclusion to everything discussed, it appears that the legal system aims to promote justice, such as legal aid, and the right to be trialled. However, this is not always successful, as demonstrated in cases such as the mandatory life sentence, and psychiatric harm. Both these example of illustrations where the justice can either be given to one side, whereas the other side suffers. The questioned asked is which side would be more beneficial for society i.e. a utilitarianists view point. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    his estate , their proneness to disease, lack of wind resistance and like was of a standard between that of an urban observer and a arboriculturist. In the Wagon Mound case the privy council said that the shipowner was liable for a fire caused by discharging oil in Sydney harbourt

  2. Was Saxon justice harsh and superstitious?

    This might not be so easy. One of the earliest accounts of this ordeal describes how the accused 'plunged his right hand into the cauldron. In the bubbling it was not easy for him to grasp the little ring but at last he drew it out'.

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    word insanity or comments to direct ion insanity or the case is ruined. Diminished responsibility can be defined as, "Abnormality of the mind, arrested or retarded development or disease or injury to the mind, as to severely affect the actions of the person."

  2. Law in association with the criminalisation of certain drugs.

    4 Jones, B. Heroin Crisis, Bookman Press, Melbourne, 1999. 5 Mukherjee, S. and Jorgensen, L. Burglary: A Social Reality, (1986) Proceedings of Seminary on Burglary, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra. 6 Manderson, D. From Mr Sin to Mr Big - A History of Australian Drug Laws, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1993.

  1. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    It also identified that between the two there remains a grey area. These situations arise (such as in this case) where the alleged intrusion is a result of the reporting on the information to a third party by a party to the relationship, which creates the privacy.

  2. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    eleven at the time of the murder of James Bulger, that the parents should have been found partly responsible for the actions of their children. Of course this is only my opinion on the matter. To further research the issue of age related to criminal responsibility I will produce a questionnaire which I will put to the public.

  1. Should Capital Punishment be enforced

    guillotine, hanging, lethal injection, intoxicating one with poisonous gas and lastly, stoning. Methods that are utilized in the United States presently include the electric chair method, the lethal injection method, hanging and intoxicating one with poisonous gas. The firing squad method was also used in the United States in the

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    The instrument may be discharged by operation of law in the case of insolvency, in the case of lapse of time under the Statute of Limitations. This provision regarding discharge of an instrument in the same way as a simple contract applies only to immediate parties.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work