• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Criticism's and Reforms for Murder

Extracts from this document...


Criticisms and Reforms for Murder Criticisms: Reforms: The lack of a precise legal definition of death - creates uncertainty. Most countries have a legal definition of death which is 'when the brain stem is dead and the victim's brain cannot function spontaneously. Criminal Law Revision Committee rejected defining death in a statute in 1980. The year and a day rule - In order for a defendant to be liable for a homicide offence, the victim had to die within 366 days of the last act done to the victim by the defendant. Criticised because the advances in technology means that victims can be kept alive for longer than 366 days, even though the original injuries remain the actual cause of death The Law reform Act 1966 has therefore abolished this rule. ...read more.


S and H also argue that virtual certainty test is illogical as a defendant who mistakenly foresees death as a possible consequence is just as morally guilty as the one whose assumption is correct. A concept of conditional intent has been put forward by S and H suggest that a consequence should only be considered to have been intended if it was either the defendant's purpose, or a result which he believed had to take place if that purpose was to be achieved. For example, if you throw a stone at a person sitting in a car your purpose is to hit them with the stone. You might not intend criminal damage but this will be a condition of you achieving your goal. Recklessness - It could be argued that some reckless homicides should be classed as murder as they have so little regard for human life that they are morally equivalent to intentional killings e.g. ...read more.


The offence should be the same disregarding states of mind but these should be taken into account when sentencing. Mandatory life sentence for murder - At present a person who helps to end the life of a terminally ill relative on compassionate grounds is treated in the same way as a cold-blooded killer. Moloney can be placed anywhere in between. This is inflexible and also goes against the doctrine of judicial independence. Society is supposed to be registering its disapproval of these offences and yet the circumstances of a particular offence could make a huge difference to the way that society viewed it. A House of Lords Select Committee (1989) recommended that the mandatory life sentence for murder should be abolished. If so it would have to be in conjunction with a system of classification or the abolition of the distinction of murder and manslaughter with the courts having discretion over sentencing. ?? ?? ?? ?? Misbah Hanif 13th September 2004 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Offences against the person act 1861; criticisms and reforms.

    Some people are also critically of the lack of protection for women who are abused by their partners. Although the law in theory protects all there is very little protection for women who are beaten and raped by their partners.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    word insanity or comments to direct ion insanity or the case is ruined. Diminished responsibility can be defined as, "Abnormality of the mind, arrested or retarded development or disease or injury to the mind, as to severely affect the actions of the person."

  1. Law of Homicide

    The R v backhouse (1984) is the case about a husband murdering Colyn Bedale-Taylor 63 years old neighbour when he was attempting to kill his wife. In this case the actus reus was that it was a unlawful killing of a human and no defence were applicable because he killed his neighbour and caused grievously bodily harm to his wife.

  2. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    proceeding, as by a witness at a trial, or in matters in which an oath is authorized or required by law, as in an affidavit affecting title to property. To constitute perjury in a legal proceeding the offender need not know that the statement would affect the determination of the

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    It is neither a bill nor a note; but if attested, it can be sued on either as a bond or a promissory note. A Shah Jog Hundi differs from a bill in two respects, namely, (i) the acceptance of the drawee is not generally written across it but the particulars are entered in the drawer's book, and (ii)

  2. Evaluation of Murder

    The operating cause test tries to provide justice as unforeseeable acts break the chain of causation. There is controversy over medical cases. For example blaue, you could argue that the defendant shouldn't put the victim in that position, but it could also be argued that the rule doesn't reflect the defendant's degree of fault and is too harsh.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work