• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critique Law and Order.

Extracts from this document...


Lauren Martone 9/17/03 Critique Law and Order For just about as long as I can remember watching TV, it seems, there has been a program called Law & Order somewhere on the dial. As a child I remember my parents always tuning into the latest episode, and so to stay up for evening TV in my household meant watching the show with the "grown-ups," a very desirable thing to do! For those of you unfamiliar with this phenomenon (what, have you been hiding in the woods?), allow me to bring you up to date. It's about cops and crooks, lawyers and plaintiffs, crime and punishment. The stories often come from real-life headlines and although the show has had many different actors come and go over the years, it hasn't seemed to affect its fan base. I'll never forget the first time I watched Law & Order. It was 10:00 PM in the middle of the week and I was only about 10 years old. ...read more.


Law & Order is the longest running drama on television at 12 years and is the number 6 rated show this season. Repeats of the original Law & Order are so often in syndication it's been said that at any given time somewhere in America there's always at least one episode of Law & Order on the air. That may be an exaggeration, but not by much. This series also gave birth to two other shows that are intertwined, sometimes, with the original. One is "SVU," Special Victims Unit and the other is "Criminal Intent". These programs are not like the "spin-offs" of years gone by, where characters from one show ended up with their own shows. The three Law & Order shows all run simultaneously, sometimes moving in and out of each others plot-lines, on occasion. Its as if they made a conscious effort that if they were going to do any "spin-offs" they were going to have to have their own personality. ...read more.


One can count on there being several possible suspects all looking quite guilty in the first half hour of programming, while in the second half the "legal eagles" duke it out in dramatic fashion, with the occasional tearful courtroom confession squeezed out "just in the nick of time". Even the predictability of this formula holds some comfort for the audience. This formula has even created a cheering section within my family. My father prefers the first half, with the detective work doing the excavation and my mother preferring the second half with all the courtroom intrigue and maneuvering. I tend to straddle the fence, really enjoying it in its entirety. I guess now that I'm all grown up with the ability to watch whatever I want, I still tend to tune into Law & Order, either the current incarnation or one of the reruns on cable TV and continue to enjoy this show. That's the best example of "quality control" one can give when it comes to such a long running show...it worked then, it works now, and I can hardly envision a time when that won't be true. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    This defence makes no distinctions between insane and non-insane automatism 2. It is less strict than the current defence and includes impaired consciousness. E.g. Broom v Perkins (1987) 3. The defence attempts to make a distinction between automatism and voluntary intoxication, at present this distinction is confused Consent - For non-fatal offences (low level)

  2. civil law, criminal law and habeas corpus

    of which may be that alleged terrorists are not brought to trial. state terrorism, repressive measures employed by a government against its own population; or terrorism instigated or sponsored by a government against other states or individuals. In the first case, terrorist measures are employed by the state in order to coerce, intimidate, repress, and ultimately eliminate opponents.


    selected would form the jury, there are procedures by which objections may be made to a limited number of potential individual jurors. In the UK these are called peremptory challenges, whilst in the USA the process is called voir dire and has become a significant feature in the run up to a trial.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Therefore, no one is prejudiced for want of notice. [Sec. 98 (f)] 8. Where the party entitled to notice promises to pay unconditionally the amount due under an instrument after dishonor and with full knowledge of facts. [Sec. 98 (g)] Notary Public The notary public is an officer appointed by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work