• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Current Issues in Public International Law- work plan 3- The Use of force, War and the Role of the UN

Extracts from this document...


Current Issues in Public International Law- work plan 3- The Use of force, War and the Role of the UN The corollary of the necessity of any effective legal system to provide a fair and adequate means of peacefully settling disputes is a prohibition on unlawful use of force. Theoretically, this necessity not to use unlawful force can be said to be one of the most fundamental rules of international law and has the status of jus cogens. The United Nations Charter demonstrates profound commitment to denounce the use of unlawful force in its preamble. It avows, "[determined] to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war....to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person...to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one and other as good neighbours.....[and of paramount importance] to maintain international peace and security...."1 However, the actual use of force remains to be a highly litigious area of international law. When legal principles are made to prevent certain acts, it does not signify that those acts would never take place. Hence, if war is written on the cards it is predestined that it will take place. ...read more.


The Caroline Case11 again emphasised the customary test, which is used to determine that for a state to act in self-defence it had to show, 'a necessity of self-defence, instant, overwhelming, leaving no choice of means, and no moment for deliberation'12. The right of Aramis to self-defence is therefore extended to a situation where it fears imminent threat, and where Aramis has exhausted all peaceful alternatives. Dinstein distinguishes between anticipatory self-defence, which remains unlawful and interceptive self-defence, which is lawful, in circumstances where the attack is imminent and unavoidable13. As we are not told about any kind of attack on the nationals of Aramis, therefore, Aramis is well advised to continue to use peaceful measures to rescue its nationals, it must be noted that any aggressive form of anticipatory self-defence will be unlawful. Prior to 1945, the protection of nationals abroad was construed as a legitimate exercise of the right of self-defence, recognised in both writings of jurist and the practises of judges. In the Spanish Zones of Morocco Claim14, Umpire Huber Stated: "It cannot be denied that at a certain point, the interests of a state in exercising protection over its nationals and their property can take precedence over territorial sovereignty, despite the absence of any conventional provisions. ...read more.


However, there is generally believed to be an obligation on outside states not to intervene in another state's civil war by supporting one side or the other. The Declaration on Friendly Relations requires 'Every State to refrain from organising, instigating, assisting or participating in acts of civil strife or terrorist acts [against another state]'. However, Aramis cannot be found guilty of doing this, as it did not in any way instigate the civil war in Drakkar, (if anything the guilty party to this is the state of Xeryus, who have been accused of stirring up the tribe to revolt against the government). If Aramis does provide military assistance, it would be fair to say that they will be assisting a democratically elected government. In our scenario if the government of Drakkar (who are in a civil war) request Aramis to provide it with military assistance then Aramis would be justified by giving that assistance. In sum, Aramis would be best advised to engage in vigorous diplomatic protests to the authorities of Drakkar for the safe return of its nationals. Also if this is unsuccessful, Aramis should bring the matter before the UN Security Council for an emergency debate. While at this point Aramis could offer its services for deployment in Drakkar upon the invitation of the head of the national government of Drakkar. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    This can be constructed as malice aforethought and although not necessary for murder it is evidence. In the 1957 the statue simply says 'lose his self control' not 'sudden and temporary' which was a result of the case of Duffy. However the courts tended to continue with the Duffy timescale.

  2. Discuss the persuasive techniques used by Michael Moore in three scenes from his film ...

    which is again political bias and selective omission as it disregards the information that he became a tyrannical dictator that murdered his people. The use of Statistics when describing the 200000 civilians killed seems duly informed, as there is no source.

  1. Our Day Out and social deprivation.

    She could also be seen as a bit cynical since she states that the education system does not know what to do with children like these. That is why she feels so strongly about the day out because she knows her Progress Class has little else to look forward to in life.

  2. Duress and Necessity

    The defence of duress is no available to a person who voluntary and with knowledge joins a gang or criminal organisation or conspiracy and knowing that others might bring them pressure to commit an offence.

  1. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    This is mainly done because its part of their job or because they want to move up the ranks quicker and sowing good self discipline and good behaviour may well speed this up. Current affairs: Abu Ghraib Torture and Prisoner Abuse: On 2003 a number of serious incidents of abuse

  2. The Supreme Court of Canada and the Charter: Democratic or Anti-Democratic?

    Physicians avoided the transfusion as long as possible but eventually gave it to her to save her live. The issues faced were the freedom of religion and the parent's right to choose medical care - rights to life and equality rights.

  1. Vicariouis liability and article 21

    UNDERSTANDING THE LAW RELATED WITH ARTICLE 21 Article 21 lays down that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to 'procedure established by law'. The expression 'procedure established by law' introduces into India the American concept of procedural due process which enables the courts

  2. The Role of the ICJ

    Worldwide sovereignty would also come into play an each country would have a fair and equal opinion. In regards to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in my opinion we are aware that this is the closet thing so far to Universal Jurisdiction.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work