• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Death Penalty

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished: DISCUSS The death penalty originated when man's primitive ancestors were permitted to punish the perpetrator of a crime. Making both the murderer and the victim suffer, the death penalty was obviously not the answer to some. To compensate for a committed crime -in this process- the human life is stolen. The countries that carry the death penalty use it as a punishment for intentional murder, espionage and treason. Today the process is virtually abolished in Western Europe, Latin America and United Kingdom. Nevertheless, some countries, looking at this through a religious perspective, still apply this for sexual and religious crime. This topic has been brought to the world debate for many reasons; two of them being innocent lives spared and terrorism. There are a number of incontrovertible arguments for and against capital punishment. Supporters of the death penalty claim that true justice can only be served by the death penalty. As the offender has committed such a harsh crime, only a punishment to the fullest extent should be given. ...read more.

Middle

When the murderer kills, it is in a still mode; it is inadequate to think of any severe consequences. In addition, the offender does not expect to be caught and doesn't think about the difference in death and imprisoning. In the act of murdering, the offender is still alive, alternatively, the victim is dead and its family is suffering. Since there is no way to make the situation fair by having none of the parties suffer, the alternate is used. The death penalty makes the situation fair by making both parties- victim and killer- suffer; moreover it abolishes the murderer from killing again. As the offender compensates for the crime it then feels empathy for the victim as the perpetrator is put into the same situation as the victim was. Conversely, by having two lives taken, there is more anguish. If the offender is executed, it will not bring the victim back to life. Instead the murderer should pay blood money, where the money would represent the nihilty of the victim's life. ...read more.

Conclusion

When the taxpayer's money is going to feed the criminal, the atmosphere is ambivalent. The criminal is the taxpayer's enemy, so then why is the committer being fed by its enemy? If the tax is going for criminals, then it could have rather been given to old, homeless people. Yet again, paying more once instead of paying little, an ample amount of times, seems logical. When the taxpayer's money goes to the death penalty, the tax is more efficient as the murderer is being killed and disappearing out of the society's life; which obviously leads a decrease in murder. The Criminal Justice System is spread around the world to control crime and to achieve 3 main objectives: detect crime, support victims and punish more offenders. The CJS works by giving adults (18+) a severe punishment while children (10-17) are warned or reprimand. I personally think that the death penalty should NOT be abolished because; already there is an ample amount of chaos in our world. For me imagining the consequences is a difficult thing to do. Imprisoning is futile and a waste of time. This process- capital punishment- serves the offender in the perfect way to tell others not to murder. ?? ?? ?? ?? Areej Karim 9A ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Should juvenile offenders be treated differently to adult offenders?

    This affects the victim and the accused. People with limited education or don't understand the court procedures are disadvantaged as they are unaware of their rights. This Act aims to make juvenile offenders take blame for their dealings, recognise the victims rights, avoid the cost and time of the court proceedings and substitutes to detention.

  2. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    that Christians exact upon Muslims. In their retaliation upon Islamic Syria, the Romans reverse--and thus complete--the lawyer's narrative paradigm that began in similitude. They enact his warning that proximity may harbor and disguise danger, and they model one extreme resolution of the unsettling ambiguities they perceive in such intimacy.

  1. Should Capital Punishment be enforced

    guillotine, hanging, lethal injection, intoxicating one with poisonous gas and lastly, stoning. Methods that are utilized in the United States presently include the electric chair method, the lethal injection method, hanging and intoxicating one with poisonous gas. The firing squad method was also used in the United States in the

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    The bank contended wrongful dishonor of a check of a corporation does not give a cause of action for damages to officers and shareholders of the corporation. The trial court held for Kendall, and bank appealed. Decision and Rationale: The appellate court held that the bank was liable to the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work