• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the special defences of diminished responsibility and provocation, Comment on the advantages and disadvantages of these defences.

Extracts from this document...


Nicola Osborne a) Describe the special defences of diminished responsibility and provocation b) Comment on the advantages and disadvantages of these defences There are three special defences to a charge of murder which can reduce the offence from murder to manslaughter. These are diminished responsibility, provocation and suicide pact. Diminished responsibility Where a person kills or is party to the killing of another, he / she shall not be convicted of murder if he/she was suffering from such abnormality of mind (whether arising from a condition of arrested or retarded development of mind or any inherent causes or induced by disease or injury) as substantially impaired his medical responsibility in doing or being a party to the killing. Homicide Act 1957 sec 2 The law is that the defendant has to prove that their responsibility was diminished. They have to satisfy a judge and jury of this through the balance of probabilities. Elements which the defence must prove are that when the crime took place the defendant was suffering from abnormality of mind. Abnormality of mind is said to be where the state of mind is different from an average person and would be judged as abnormal by a reasonable person. In R v Seers (1985) the defendant stabbed his estranged wife, and claimed diminished responsibility on the grounds of his chronic depression. ...read more.


The fact that something caused the defendant to lose self control is not enough. The law expects people to be able to have some control over their emotions, a tendency to have violent rages, is seen as a defect in character rather than an excuse. If there is evidence of provocation, it is down to the jury to see if the circumstances surrounding the crime were enough to make the loss of self control sufficiently excusable to reduce the offence from murder to manslaughter. In deciding if this is the case, the jury have to apply what they feel to be appropriate standard of behaviour, making allowances for human nature and emotions. They can also take into account any other relevant matters such as sex and age. In R v Davies (1975), it was held that the acts of the lover of Davies wife could be taken into account as provoking Davies to kill his wife. A young person isn't expected to have as much self control as an adult. The loss of self control must have been sudden when the crime was committed, if there is evidence that the defendant did not lose his/her self control but used the situation to carry out a deliberate killing then the defendant can not use the defence of provocation. Provocation is not ruled out as a matter of law either because the provocation conduct has been extended over a long period of time or because there has been a delayed reaction. ...read more.


Juries have a hard time with deciding on these types of cases and therefore losing this defence would remove the problems associated with these complicated charges for a jury, therefore it should cut down time involved. One big advantage of losing this defence is that it would get rid of the fear that men use this defence to kill women. With domestic violence on the increase this could be a major factor. There are also disadvantages to, losing this defence. If we did not have these defences in place there could be more acquittals by juries who feel that the accused was morally less worthy of blame and also a murder charge may seem inappropriate term for killing under provocation or diminished responsibility. Going back to domestic violence issues, the defence is useful for women in situations of domestic violence who kill in self defence. A bill to amend the Homicide Act was thrown out of Parliament in both 1991 and 1994. Different organisations want the bill amended to help women suffering from domestic violence with these defences. Diminished responsibility names medically a woman's actions and implies that had their mental facilities not been impaired they would have continued being used as a punch bag. I feel that the Homicide Act should be amended to help women suffering from domestic violence that do kill in self defence. Sources The Guardian Justice for women Homicide Act 1957 Criminal Law by Catherine Elliot ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Automatism is generally considered to be a state in which a person has no ...

    5 star(s)

    The Judge, however, decided "the law is not concerned with the origin of the disease or the cause of it but simply with the mental condition which has brought about the act." The judge attempted to narrow the defence of automatism by altering the rules laid down in McNaughten, making

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Law of Evidence - R v Kearley

    5 star(s)

    Assuming that the evidence was hearsay it is submitted that they should be admissible as the dangers associated with implied assertions are not as great as they are for express assertions. Firstly, according to Dennis26 insincerity will rarely be in issue, as 'it would be a very elaborate kind of

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    - Gave wife a VD. He didn't tell her he had it so there was no deception. Therefore not guilty R v Flattery (1877) - Flattery convinced victim that he was performing a surgical operation. However he was in fact having sexual intercourse. She reports it and he says she consented to it.

  2. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    This is highlighted by the case below. R v Secretary of State for Transport ex p Factortame (No.2) [1991] 1 All ER 70, HL Spanish fishermen AA claimed the UK fisheries policy (as effected by the Merchant Shipping Act 1988)

  1. Law in association with the criminalisation of certain drugs.

    www.ukcia/research/NewZealandInquiryAppropriateLegalStatus.pdf - Commonwealth Government, Tough on Drugs: The Right Approach for the Right Results, Phamplet, Canberra, http://www.drugs.health.gov.au/campaign/materials.htm - Elliot, A.J. and Chapman, S. Heroin Hell Their Own Making: Construction of Heroin Users in the Australian Press 1992-1997. Drug and Alcohol Review, vol.

  2. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    To test this out, I researched past managers of arsenal football club and changed the name of Don Howe who managed the club from 83-86 to Damion Howard. Within minutes this change was picked up and removed. This shows me that Wikipedia are relatively reliable in removing errors swiftly therefore

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    The banker will be held guilty of negligence in such a case and will not be entitled to the protection given under Section 131 (where a banker acting bona fide will not be liable to the true owner, if he receives payment of a crossed check for a customer whose title is defective).

  2. Law of Homicide

    The Theft Act (1968) is that if someone is dishonestly, appropriate, property, belonging to another and the intention to permanently deprive. The theft and steal shall be construed accordingly. The actus reus is property, appropriation and the mens rea is dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work