• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Development of case law

Extracts from this document...


Assignment 1.1 When William 1 arrived in England in 1066 he began to lay the basis for the development of common law. He did this gradually using subtle tactics. First of all he introduced the feudal system, this was where all the land belonged to the King and bits of this was granted to people who supported him and were willing to do something in return for the land. Land could have been of great benefit to some at this time for example it may have been used to make a living for many, so therefore more people would have been willing to offer the King services. The people who did gain land passed it on to their follows and so eventually the King gained control of the whole country. This contributed to the development of common law as having control over the whole country brings a lot of power with it and therefore he was able to take the next step. ...read more.


This was because when a case arose which was not covered by an existing writ a new one had to be created but this system was stopped by the end of the 13th century. Both of these problems were major floors in the system. Some started arguing that the common law system was too inflexible and some that 'equity varied with the length of the Chancellor's foot or in other words, it was unreliable and never the same. Gradually over years he gathered together a large body of principles which gave rise to equity. Equity is different to common law in that common law could be said to be inflexible as there is not much leeway with it whereas equity has a lot of flexibility. The Earl of Oxford's case was important because the outcome said that equity always prevails which is a rule we still stand by. This was an important outcome as if otherwise we might be standing by other rules now. ...read more.


They are there to ensure that the decision is morally fair. Some of these include 'one who seeks equity must do equity', this means that in order to receive equity the person who is claiming it must be fair themselves, for example snidely remarks would in most cases mean that their equity suits would almost certainly turn out badly. Another one is that 'one who comes into equity must come with "clean hands" ', this means that it will not permit a party to profit from it's own wrong for example if someone wants their tenant to leave they can't have violated the tenants rights. Another common maxim of equity is that 'between equal equities the law will prevail', this means that equity doesn't provide any remedies if the parties are equal and if neither has done any wrong. Nowadays there is still a body of rules of equity which is different from common law rules, yet acts as an addition to it. Although they are used by the same courts the two branches of the law are separate. Where there is conflict equity still prevails. Sarah Perry ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Does Hart's theory differ to the 'gunman writ large' situation?

    It follows from the above discussion that Hart may well have attempted to resolve the problems so obvious with the Austinian model, however, as Raz in particular is keen to point out, Hart's theory appears to collapse into the same type of command theory, if a little different.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    allows the defendant to put forward the whole story rater than the immediate reasons why they killed. 2. It is difficult for the Jury to understand More characteristics are being accepted but the jury can't imagine characteristics that are unimaginable.

  1. Nowadays Equity has become more rigid and has certain rules which must be obeyed ...

    These rules ore called the Maxims of Equity. Some of the more common maxims include: 'Delay defeats equities' this means that if equity is to be claimed then it must be done a suitable amount of time after the crime, a long delay can mean that equity is not allowed to be claimed for.

  2. In order to analyse the differing approaches, concerning formalities and incompletely constituted trusts within ...

    Trusts are primarily about money and the preservation of wealth. The idea of the trust developed as a means for providing for the family, although these days' trusts are used for many more purposes. 'The trust' continues to be a form of property-holding of ever increasing importance because of its adaptability and convenience in effecting complicated forms of settlement.

  1. Contact orders

    This has now seemed to be the approach in the court of appeal's view, which has adopted various reports Report to the Lord Chancellor - Question of Parental in cases where there has been domestic violence, April 2000 HMSO following the Consultation Paper on Contact between children and violent parents

  2. Inconsistent to draw up the relationship between common law and equity, we firstly have ...

    The court held that if an injuction were to be granted, the employees need to stop their strike immediately. However they refused, the injunction was not granted. While for the maxims of delay defeats equity. If a plaintiff were to take an unreasonably long time to bring an action in court, equitable remedies will not be available.

  1. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    Robert Burchinal. Mr. Burchinal was attempting to patent an apple tree found in the early 1990's in the Wenatchee region of Washington, which he cleverly dubbed "Burchinal Red Delicious." Somewhere within the process of the patent forms Microsoft's and Burchinal's names got mixed up and Microsoft was the proud new patentee of a lovely breed of apple tree.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    for the information of the drawer and the endorsers, is that it enables the bill to be accepted for honor. Contents of Protest (Sec. 101) A protest to be valid, must contain the particulars given below, and the omission of one or more of them will render the protest invalid.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work