• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss dishonesty.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Dishonesty Dishonesty is an element of liability in theft obstructing electricity, deception, handling stolen goods and some related offences. To convict of such offences the magistrates or jury must be satisfied that what was done was dishonest by the standards of ordinary decent people and that the defendant had realised that at the time. The 1968 Act only provides a partial definition of dishonesty, leaving some discretion to the courts. Unusually, the statutory definition, contained in section 2(1), makes use of examples, stating three situations in which a defendant should not be deemed dishonest: * If he appropriates property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or * If he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other's consent if the other knew of the appropriation and circumstances of it; or * (except where the property come to him as trustee or personal representative) ...read more.

Middle

Deception Property; obtaining property belonging to another Section 34 (1) provides that section 4 (1) applies to other offences in the Theft Act 1968 (including, therefore section 15) as it applies to theft. Thus, property includes, for example, intangible property, (including for problems over whether the property obtained is the same as the property which belonged to the victim. However, the remaining sub-section of section 4 apply only to the offences of theft. Thus, land (wild animals and mushrooms, etc, which belong to someone else, are capable of being obtained by deception. Deception Within in the Theft Act 1968, a person who uses deception in order to obtain property to which he believes himself entitled will not be guilty. As one may be aware deception may be dishonest within the above statement. Examples include a false representation by words or conduct of a matter of fact, including the existence of an intention or law that is made deliberately or recklessly to another person. ...read more.

Conclusion

by deception cannot be convicted of theft in relation to it because the property cannot be stolen; land and things forming part of it may be obtained by deception but they cannot generally be stolen. Apart from this exceptional type of case a person who dishonestly obtains by deception property belonging to another with intent permanently to deprive the other of it commits theft and obtaining property by deception. This is the effect of the decision of the majority of the House of Lords in Gamez. This is a result which was not intended in the Criminal Law Revision Committees in its Eighth Report. It is submitted that, where the government of a case is that the accused has dishonestly obtained property be deception, the offences under Section 15 of the 1968 Act is generally more appropriate ( and certainly easier for a jury to understand if the case is tried in the Crown Court); the greater maximum punishments under Section 15 (ten years imprisonment, as opposed to seven for theft) should not be forgotten. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    further direction to the jury would be needed as intention would be clear. * R v Scally (1995) Arsonist killed child in building. Convicted of murder Appealed - COA - Scally was an exceptional case and N direction should be used. Judge gave direction but said "virtual certainty" (Hyam direction)

  2. Vicariouis liability and article 21

    We will see in the annexure that how the Bangladeshi women who was visiting in India was sexually harassed by the railway employees and the railway board had to pay the compensation to her per orders of the Supreme Court of India.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    The presiding judge stated that "The controlling fact that alteration occurred after certification of instrument is not disputed. The bank in checking its records, discover alteration and refused payment. Under these circumstances, the decision of the bank, if any, is not a substantial or proximate cause of the in accordance

  2. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    by the rule against double jeopardy and may be prosecuted again on the same or a related charge. Reprieve, in criminal law, the temporary suspension of a sentence, such as a stay of execution (in countries that have retained the death penalty), granted a person convicted of a capital crime.

  1. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    recognized a relationship which aimed primarily at the destruction of Islam, and in which missionary endeavor held a subordinate place." Even as late and supposedly liberal a cleric as Robert Holcot (d. 1349) argued the right to kill Muslims who refused to convert.

  2. Is Nuclear Power the Answer for the Future?

    * There are fears that terrorists may be able to launch attacks against Nuclear Power stations with potentially devastating human consequences. Also, illicit trade in radioactive reactor products for nuclear or 'dirty' bombs could be a major threat to world stability.

  1. Public Service Course

    This trial is held in private and each party will have a fair and equal opportunity to state their side of the dispute to the judge (the judge may be a district or deputy district judge). This procedure can be quick and straightforward.

  2. Justices of the Peace - Magistrates Courts

    class had no apparent effect on their judicial behaviour, their political beliefs did influence their behaviour particularly in relation to sentencing. But anecdotally, the members of a white middle-class bench would probably regard running away from the police as a sign of guilt, whereas in some communities it is automatic behaviour learned at a very early age.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work