• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss whether the balance between the rights of an individual and the powers of the police to detain and interview a person at the police station are satisfactory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss whether the balance between the rights of an individual and the powers of the police to detain and interview a person at the police station are satisfactory. The Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) and the PACE Codes of Practice provide the core framework of police powers and safeguards around stop and search, arrest, detention, investigation, identification and interviewing people being detained. The latest versions of these codes came into practice at the end of 2005. The codes are vital in making sure the balance between police powers and the rights of an individual is correct. Another procedure which aims to make sure the rights of individuals are protected is The Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure. It was set up in 1978 as there was concern over police procedures and whether or not they were abusing their power. This, in my view, was highly necessary. The type of power that police get needs to have boundaries set or people can take advantage. * Code C Code C sets out the requirements for the detention, treatment and questioning of suspects not related to terrorism in police custody by police officers. ...read more.

Middle

A person, unless under the Terrorism act, cannot be held for more than 24 hours without the permission of a senior member of staff. After this point, the superintendent or a person of higher ranking must decide whether or not there is enough evidence to charge the suspect. If, after 36 hours, the police still wish to keep the suspect in custody, they must appeal to the magistrate's court for permission to hold said detainee for a further amount of time, a maximum of 96 hours. After this point, the suspect must either be released, or charged with an offence. Unless under the terrorism act, these time limits have to be abided by. I think that this is a very important rule, as it stops potentially innocent people being detained for longer than is necessary. I also agree with the fact that a magistrate's court has to make the decision on whether or not a suspect can be kept in custody for longer than 36 hours. ...read more.

Conclusion

I agree with this, as the intimate samples being taken can be quite invasive. They shouldn't just be done by anybody. I think that these should only be done if strictly necessary, and only if they are going to benefit the case in some way. This protects the suspect themselves from anything unnecessarily invasive. A defendant, up until the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 was enacted, defendants could refuse to answer questions without it harming their cases. Now, if a defendant remains silent throughout their interview, especially if they leave out a crucial piece of evidence, it can be used against them in court and affect their case. Also, it naturally looks like the defendant has something to hide if they refuse to speak in their interview. I don't completely agree with this, as a person may just not want to even entertain the idea that they are guilty of something that they perhaps haven't done. The fact that a person can be scrutinized for this and it consequently affecting their case seems unjust to me. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Automatism is generally considered to be a state in which a person has no ...

    5 star(s)

    the condition as a 'disease of the mind' but presence or otherwise of recurrence is not conclusive." This test was also suggested in the case of Sullivan (1984), however, the Judge said, that it was irrelevant whether the source of the defect was "permanent or transient and intermittent, provided that

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Describe the powers the Police have to stop and search and arrest individuals

    4 star(s)

    The Police used to have to ask a person if they could search them, they can now just carry out a search without permission, this also greatly increases the Police powers. There are times however when Police officers can search anyone within a certain area, for example: when there is

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Police powers

    4 star(s)

    The detention must be reviewed by the custody officer within 6 hours of detention and thereafter every 9 hours. The custody officer must release him if there are no grounds for keeping him and he/she must record all events that take place such as interviews or visits to Shane's cell by police officers.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    The central question was whether the Law provided, as the government claimed, sufficiently strong safeguards in the form of detailed procedures to be complied with if the police action was to be regarded as lawful. This doubt was justified when the Maxwell Confait case in the 1970's came to light

  1. Offences against the person act 1861; criticisms and reforms.

    The Government included in the Crime Disorder Bill aggravated offences for racially motivated violence based on the existing offences in the OAPA 1861. The Government proposes to keep a number of offences relating to the police including the offence of assaulting a police officer and assault in resisting arrest.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    The defendant CAN NOT plea diminished responsibility AND drunkenness. During most ask whether the defendant would have committed this crime if suffering from depression alone. Alcoholism (as a disease) is acceptable as causing diminished responsibility. It would be up to the barrister to decide which defence applies.

  1. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    it from granting interim relief, is a rule of national law, must set aside that rule. The House of Lords thereupon granted an order restraining the Secretary of State from enforcing the legislation in question against PP. The European Court of Justice is in no doubt that Community law overrides any national law that conflicts with it.

  2. Is Nuclear Power the Answer for the Future?

    demand for uranium grows because of new electricity generation and new plant construction, CO2 levels will also rise. (http://www.politics.co.uk/feature/domestic policy/environment/energy/greenpeace-nuclear-power-%E2%80%93-wrong-answer-$460652.htm * There have been several failures in breeder reactor programs. The Monju fast breeder reactor in Japan was closed in 1995 until recently because of a serious accident.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work