• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Distinguishing the criminal and civil law

Extracts from this document...


Distinguishing the criminal and civil law Before explaining some differences between civil and criminal functions and purposes, we must have some idea of the nature of law "law is asset of rules which prohibit us from doing curtain things on pain of punishment and which exist for the settling of disputes between people and recognized legal entities and between privet individuals" (Roger Thomas dose 2003-2004 p.7.). As roger Thomas said there should be a set of rules for each individual to prohibit him from doing things which are not right, therefore there is a parliament and other different bodies which sets the rules for the environment. ...read more.


a civil wrong, in the modern law the emphasis in tort has developed very much towards a law of interrelated duties as a result, and the law of negligence has achieved increasing importance, And had developed humorous individual aspects. As Michel Jones puts it more simply: "the law of tort is primarily concerned with providing a remedy to person who has been harmed by the conduct of others" (Chris turner/tort law, chapter 1; 2003) It is important to realize that civil law is very different from criminal law. Criminal law is a part of public law, while civil law is the separate category of private law. ...read more.


A person who commits a crime is said to have offended against the state, and so the state has the right to prosecute them. Even the standard of proof is different in civil and criminal cases. Criminal cases must be proved "beyond reasonable doubt", where is in civil cases have only to be proved "on the balance of probabilities". So as I have distinguished civil and criminal law I'll conclude with the words of Sir John Salmond by defining law in general "the body of principles recognized and applied by the state in the administration of justice". Law could be also described as a formal mechanism of social control. (Jacqueline Martin p-3 AQA law). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    year old woman was guilty of contributory negligence in crossing a road one had to consider a woman of her age, not a hypothetical reasonable man. In Roberts v Ramsbottom6 the defendant suffered a slight stroke just before getting into his car.

  2. The Difference between Civil Law and Criminal Law

    In other words, there is no logical or rational reason to doubt the defendant's guilt.

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    This was a miss-direction and he appealed. Judge said that Watson would have seen the mans age and frailty and therefore the jury should know this fact to. R v Ball (1989) - Ball had a dispute with a neighbour and had a shotgun, he also carried around blanks and live rounds in his pockets.

  2. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    A child of 10 who has committed an offence is more appropriately dealt with in the care system than in the criminal justice system. The European court says that a child must be able to participate in their own defence and I think a child of 14 is able to do that.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Protest of Foreign Bills (Sec. 104): Foreign bills must be protested for dishonor when such protest is required by the law of the place where they are drawn. Foreign promissory notes need not be so protested. Where a bill is required by law to be protested, then instead of a

  2. Is there a tort of invasion of privacy?

    again, even before the Human rights Act the courts were slowly developing a tort of invasion of privacy based on breach of confidence. The Court of Appeal did not consider a claim based on breach of confidence in Kaye v Robinson15 and the point as to whether there was a

  1. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    I fully agree with this. One should be able to name a new species but may not be able to patent it. If this was true wouldn't we be able to patent our son or daughter? They are technically new to the world, and have a different set of genes than anyone else.

  2. Discover whether, in the criminal law, negligence ever breaks the chain of causation and ...

    Negligence did not break the chain of causation in this instance. Proving factual or "but for" causation does not prove legal causation. Legal causation is concerned with whether criminal responsibility can fairly be attributed to the accused. Another issue, which arises, is whether D's action was a substantial cause of death.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work