• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does Hart's theory differ to the 'gunman writ large' situation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Mark Rose Group B Jurisprudence Essay 1 Does Hart's theory differ to the 'gunman writ large' situation? When Hart began forming his legal theory a dominant view in legal theory literature was that law is best understood as the command of a sovereign to its subjects. The 'command' theory most actively propounded by, and identified with Austin, explained law as a matter of commands by a sovereign who is habitually obeyed by others, but who does not habitually obey others. There are regular patterns of obedience to these commands, and legal obligations exist insofar as the failure to obey is regularly followed by the application of sanctions. Hart attacks this theory at almost every point. Crucially, he argues that to take the perspective that legal systems are made up of commands backed by threats, does not distinguish the orders of a terrorist or gangster from those of a legal system. The likelihood of suffering a sanction might oblige me to behave in a certain way, but it would not impose an obligation on me. 'Law is surely not the gunmen situation writ large' stresses Hart in his essay 'The separation of law and morality.' ...read more.

Middle

However, as will now be illustrated, Hart's approach has been the subject of much debate with some critics questioning whether or not Hart has even improved on Austin. The basis for this is that a closer examination of Hart reveals that while he has sought to offer an account of law that is something more than the gunman situation writ large, his argument consistently asserts that legal obligation is independent of any moral obligations. It is this attempt to steer a middle course between the command theory as propounded by the likes of Austin and Bentham, and natural law theory that has caused some to argue that Hart's account of the law is in fact but a variation of the 'orders backed by threats' analysis. In order to grasp this, it is first and foremost necessary to delve deeper into Hart's account of law. According to Hart, a legal system can be said to exist where two conditions are present. First, officials must accept and apply a basic rule of recognition. 'Accept,' in the sense that they should regard it from an internal point of view, i.e. as the standard that needs to be complied with. ...read more.

Conclusion

Thus, there are times when Hart would appear to have moved little from Austin's command theory such as when he writes that 'so long as the laws....are obeyed by the bulk of the population this is surely all the evidence we need that a legal system exists.' In conclusion, the problem for Hart is quite clear. How can a legal positivist avoid the idea that propositions of law involve moral judgements without reducing the propositions to mere statements of fact? At the same time can one really remain a legal positivist once one claims that those legal concepts derive from an internal point of view? Perhaps, a positivist reading Hart can find some solace by adopting the Kelsen theory which may at first sight appear to abandon positivism. Indeed Murphy and Coleman in 1990 (p.27) wrote that Hart is merely Kelsen in clearer prose! Kelsen too is of the view that law looks to the attitudes of citizens. Kelsen's model of a legal system consists of a hierarchy of norms where each 'norm' is validated by the norm before it until the 'Grundnorm' is reached. Those who presuppose this basic norm view those in power as legitimately so. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Worlds Apart: Orientalism, Antifeminism, and Heresy in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale

    Sounding again the note of commonality between Muslims and Christians--"this same accord was sworn on eyther side" (II.244)--the Man of Law succinctly draws this section of his narrative to a close: "this is th' ende" (II.255). The followers of Muhammad's "lawe sweete" take up the parallel "lawe deere" of Christ,

  2. Explain the need for discipline in at least two public services. Analyse the role ...

    dealing with the people who may be causing a bother to other members of the public, this can be very risky as it is highly likely that these people have been drinking an excessive amount of alcohol, and are going to violent, the are to keep the situation under control,

  1. Is Nuclear Power the Answer for the Future?

    Many people say nuclear power is the only realistic alternative we have once fossil fuels run out, but how long would nuclear power last before we needed to decide upon another power source? In the past, breeder reactor programs have failed.

  2. Civil Obligations - Agreements

    North Western Railway [1894] 2 QB 482 Acquisition of property with obligations, when a minor acquires "a subject of a permanent nature ... with certain obligations attached to it" such as a leasehold, or shares in a company means he is bound by the obligations as long as he retains the subject.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    In these cases it is immaterial whether the alteration is beneficial or detrimental to the party charged on the contract, or whether the alteration ultimately involves any change in the rights and liabilities of the parties or not.24 What is necessary to make the instrument void is that the alteration must be material.

  2. In the context of the theoretical proposition on the issue of law and morality, ...

    In Rights of Terminally Ill Act 1995(NT), ads were portrayed to indicate euthanasia as a kind act to people who are suffering on the brink of death, creating widespread support.10 However the notion of patients suffering extreme pain is contrary to findings that illustrate that patients' main reasons for ending

  1. Explain how constitutional conventions differ from laws and discuss, with the use of examples, ...

    On the other hand, conventions are not enforced by courts because they are just practices and costumes. For instance, in BACCUS S.R.L. v SERVICIO NACIONAL DEL TRIGO, "Mr. Kerr said that it was constitutional practice or convention for the head of Servicio to get the leave of the Minister to submit to the jurisdiction.

  2. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    occupants of the house and, without retreating, kill an assailant if necessary to repel the attack. Obscenity Laws, legal restrictions on the publication of words or other material on the grounds that they are too indecent to be acceptable to society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work