• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Duress and Necessity

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Duress is defence that is used when a person is forced to commit a crime because his close friends or family are under a threat of serious physical harm or even death. It must involve an immediate threat of an unavoidable situation. If it is a situation in which he would have to time to report the offence then he will not be able to use duress as a defence. However any other threat of any kind is insufficient which shows this in SINGH [1973]. Duress is a general defence but however not for all crimes for example isn't available for someone who voluntarily and with knowledge, joins a criminal gang, organisation or conspiracy, knowing of their criminal activities and that there is a risk of them pressurizing him into committing them. ...read more.

Middle

This happened in SHARP [1987], SHEPHERD [1988] and ALI [1995]. Bob was held under circumstances were his immediate family was threatened to be killed by a gang of thieves if he didn't give the criminals the code to the safe; he did this to avoid the circumstance. Bob could use duress as his defence as he was in an unavoidable situation and problem; he had to give a code to the thieves to stop them killing his family which is a crime but he was under threat. Necessity is similar to duress as the defendant has to commit a crime to avoid threatening circumstances the only difference is that it is the situation or set of circumstances which causes a threatening harm. ...read more.

Conclusion

Pauline stole a bulldozer and bulldozed the house of Mrs Ethel Maywin because their was a fire in the street and to break the chain she had to do this. If the firebreak was not made the whole street would have been up in flames and burned down. Pauline was therefore charged with criminal damage because of her acts but using necessity as a defence may not be able to be used in this case as it is hard to use necessity as a defence as Lord Denning shown in the cases above it can only be used in certain situations. ?? ?? ?? ?? Module three - Assignment one - Task two Katherine Pettett Centre No. 27218 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    offence and so the defendant is acquitted Intoxicated mistake The defence of mistake in a sober state allows a honest and reasonable mistake to be used as a criminal defence. In reality mistakes are more common when a person is intoxicated.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    by payment in due course to the bearer thereof, notwithstanding any indorsement whether in full or in blank appearing thereon, and notwithstanding that any such indorsement purports to restrict or exclude further negotiation." Accordingly, where a check is originally issued as a bearer check, the banker may ignore any indorsements on the check.

  1. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    Forgeries must be executed with such skill or in such circumstances that they would be mistaken for genuine documents by the average person. To imitate the handwriting of another or the form of the simulated document is not necessarily attempted.

  2. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    or unable (in which case he may be sent to a mental hospital until, if ever, he is fit to stand trial). If the defendant pleads not guilty the judge (with help from both sides) tries to identify > Which alleged facts are admitted and which are denied; > Whether

  1. Hot Hollie vs Gangster Greg's Gang and the Pirated TAT.

    Now the correct lawyer has been chosen and paid for, and the evidence is accessible. The only thing left to decide is whether or not to go ahead with the suit.

  2. The essence of the defence of duress by threats is that a defendant would ...

    There is also an imminence requirement, the judge decided in the case of Hudson and Taylor that 'It is essential to the defence of duress that the threat shall be effective at the moment when the crime is committed. The threat must be a present threat in the sense that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work