• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain and illustrate the main distinctions between civil and criminal law.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain and illustrate the main distinctions between civil and criminal law. (20 marks) This question is designed to provide a clear explanation and illustration of the main distinction between criminal and civil Law. The civil justice system is designed to decide disputes between individuals. Criminal Law serves to maintain law and order, to protect society. Civil claims will arise when an individual or a business believes that their rights are being infringed in some way. Civil cases cover a wide range of issues, as there are different areas of civil law. These include: * Contract law * Tort law * Family law * Employment law * Company Law The criminal justice system affects large numbers of people. Criminal law is central to the relationship between law and society. It looks to regulate behaviour; it provides sanctions against those who break those rules. It can be classified as a formal mechanism of social control. ...read more.

Middle

In criminal cases, usually the State through the police and crown prosecution service starts the case against the defendant. The defendant in a criminal proceeding can either be found guilty or not guilty. An example of the criminal case law is; (R v Gotts) 1991- Attempt murder under duress. Ben Gotts was charged with the attempted murder of his mother. The mother had left the family home after arguments with the father and gone to a women's aid refuge with two of the young children. One morning as the mother left the refuge to take one of the children to school Ben aged 16 armed with a knife supplied by his father ran up behind her and stabbed her. He was charged with attempted murder and wounding with intent. A court is a place where justice can be administered. A court where a case is heard is called a court of first instance. ...read more.

Conclusion

In criminal cases the person making the decisions are either the magistrates or jury. * Magistrates' Court All criminal prosecutions start in the magistrate's court. Those accused of the most serious crimes such as murder, rape and robbery can only be tried in the Crown Court and hence the magistrates function is limited to holding proceedings to decide whether there is sufficient evidence to justify transferring the case to the crown court for trial. The distinction between civil and criminal law is noticeable. One of elements that separate civil law from criminal is the standard of proof; in civil cases, the court makes its decision on the "balance of probabilities". In criminal cases, the jury must be satisfied as to whether the defendant's guilt is "beyond all reasonable doubt". However, there are also some similarities that link the two; for instance, liability can be civil or criminal according to whether it is enforced by the civil or criminal courts. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984-provides an effective balance between the powers of ...

    3 star(s)

    fixed by law, * offences for which a person of 21 years of age or over may be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of five years, * conspiring to commit an offence, * attempting to commit an offence, * inciting, aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the commission of an

  2. There are four different types of law, criminal, civil, common and statuate. In this ...

    take orders from the person above them, which intern would disrupt the whole system. Restraint is a very difficult discipline to clasp especially in the royal marines, this is because they are trained to kill people but then they have to restrain themselves so that they only use it when it is needed.

  1. Study the concept of Reasonable man and reasonability in tort law.

    For example some things burn , some explode easily, that there is law of gravity. This minimum amount of knowledge of matters of everyday experience they are deemed to posess. In Caminer v Northern and London Investment Trust12 the knowledge required of a landowner with regard to elm trees on

  2. Does Hart's theory differ to the 'gunman writ large' situation?

    The various attempts at doing so are describes as either content dependant or content independent explanations. While the former type emphasise factors from within such as the nature of the subjects of the rule or the strength of the rule, the latter look outside of the rule itself to other factors such as where the rule emanates from.

  1. Explain the differences between Civil and Criminal law with respect to the role of ...

    The case must be proven "beyond all reasonable doubt" as sentencing for criminal cases can be harsh.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    therefore in practice at the very least unlawful actually means criminal and probably criminal that results in harm. R v Franklin (1883) - He threw a machine off the pier into the sea that hit swimmers Charged with unlawful act (trespass to goods)

  1. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    Robert Burchinal. Mr. Burchinal was attempting to patent an apple tree found in the early 1990's in the Wenatchee region of Washington, which he cleverly dubbed "Burchinal Red Delicious." Somewhere within the process of the patent forms Microsoft's and Burchinal's names got mixed up and Microsoft was the proud new patentee of a lovely breed of apple tree.

  2. The Age Of Criminal Responsibility

    Dr Atkinson said that "What Venables and Thompson did was exceptionally unpleasant and the fact that a little boy ended up dead is not something the nation can easily forget, but they shouldn't have been tried in an adult court because they were still children".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work