• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

For this essay we will be looking at the defence of assault and battery, consent. But first we have to discuss what is assault and battery.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In most crimes there are always defences to the offence that has been committed, for example, if one is charged with murder, then a defence of either provocation or diminished responsibility can be raised. There are other defences such as mistake or intoxication. In this case one will discuss when the defence of consent can be used against a criminal charge. For this essay we will be looking at the defence of assault and battery, consent. But first we have to discuss what is assault and battery. Assault and battery are separate crimes, under S.39 of the Criminal Justice act 1988. This was confirmed in the case of DPP vs. Little 1992. In legal terms an assault means to cause V to apprehend force, for example, waving a fist at someone's face is deemed an assault, while battery means to apply force to V; for example, punching someone in the face is a battery. Usually the two crimes are committed close together. So for instance, drawing your fist back is an assault, and then throwing the punch and connecting is a battery. Hence assault and battery. In the case of R vs. Clarence 1888 P consented to intercourse with D, despite D knowing that he was suffering from a venereal disease, which P did not know about. ...read more.

Middle

There are limitations on consent to anyone when it comes to infliction of harm upon them. A fight in public is unlawful at common law as a breach of peace. This is because the whole enterprise in unlawful, consent is not a defence. However, boxing under the Queensbury rules is treated differently. A boxer who tries to knockout his opponent certainly has the intention to cause serious harm, which is sufficient mens rea for murder and in the case of R vs. Brown 1993 all Lordships accepted that boxing was lawful. In this case two youths aged 17 and 18 decided to settle and argument with fists. One had sustained a bloody nose and bruised face. The other was found guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm. In the Attorney-General's Reference (No. 6 1980) it was stated: '...It is not in the public interest that people should try to cause or should cause each other ABH for no good reason. Minor struggles are another matter. So, in our judgement, it was immaterial whether the act occurs in private or in public; it is an assault if ABH is intended and/or caused. This means that most fights will be unlawful regardless of consent.' Is there a defence of consent when the charge is one of GBH caused by rough and undisciplined play? ...read more.

Conclusion

This shows the changing influence of public policy. However in the case of Brown and others 1993 this was deemed not to be the case. In this case Anthony Brown and other appellants belonged to a group of sadomasochistic homosexuals who, over a 10-year period willingly and enthusiastically participated in acts of violence against each other in order to gain sexual pleasure. Most of these acts were taken place in rooms that was designed as torture chambers. Activities included branding with hot metal or wire that was heated by a blow-lamp and genital torture. There was no complaints to the police, no medical attention was ever needed and there was no permanent injuries where sustained. The police discovered the activities by accident. All members were charged with various offences, including ABH under S.47 and wounding under S.20. They were convicted, and there appeal was dismissed. It was held that in the opinion of the majority, public policy requires the conviction of men participating in consensual sadomasochistic homosexual encounters resulting in ABH and wounding, so to protect society against a cult of violence with the danger of corruption of young men. This case shows that even though all men had consented to what they was doing there was still no defence to what they had taken part in. As it was said above crimes that affect and could influence the society is a crime that should be convicted of. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Law - Resulting trusts

    4 star(s)

    The Law Society in the same month published 'Cohabitation: The Case for Clear Law: Proposals for Reform.' 30 Here the Law Society proposes two-fold statutory reforms. Cohabitants should be defined as two people living together as a couple, including same-sex.

  2. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    Charged with unlawful act 1. MR? Yes (for a crime) 2. Crime? Yes 3. Was it dangerous? He said no because he thought she was already dead The jury was directed it was an objective test and concluded it was.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Since sufficient evidence of emotional distress and damage to their reputation was presented (for example, several criminal prosecutions against them for writing checks against insufficient funds), the Kendalls were able to recover for them. The court stated: "[It) was entirely foreseeable that the dist-:- of the Corporation's checks would reflect

  2. Is Diminished Responsibility Relevant?

    concerning the battered woman syndrome on their reasoning , and in the remaining cases we can but speculate as to what the outcome might have been in the absence of such evidence " 4 There is then a natural tension that develops between the theory and the practice and only

  1. Using actual situations describe the elements of actus

    If the defendant is imprisoned, he or she will usually be released after serving a proportion of the sentence, on parole. For longer-serving prisoners this release is not automatic; a parole board examines the prisoner's disciplinary record in prison, and decides how likely it is that he or she will reoffend.

  2. The Inchoate (Incomplete) Offences - Essay Notes

    Actus Reus: - Encouraging other to do something which is a crime may be spoken, written or by some sign - Needs real encouragement, not merely suggestion - D need not incite a particular person - maybe addressed to group or people in general - R v MOST (1881)

  1. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    The judge then gives any necessary directions and sets a date for the trial proper. If only legal issues are in dispute this will be a trial before a judge alone, but disputed facts (other than details relevant only to sentencing)

  2. Hot Hollie vs Gangster Greg's Gang and the Pirated TAT.

    In this case Hollie was lost her entire fortune on this fashion line. The possibilities of this business venture were endless and there is no reason why Hollie would not sue Gangster Gregg and his gang for everything they are worth, and by reviewing the profiles of the gang members, that is quite a hefty sum.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work