• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Freedom of Religion is among the most basic of Human Rights and deserves fullest protection of the

Extracts from this document...


"Freedom of Religion is among the most basic of Human Rights and deserves fullest protection of the law." To what extent if any is the principle recognised in the law of England and Wales? Article 9 states that everyone has the right to the freedom of thought, conscience and religion. Recently the EU has taken steps to ensure that all member states have antidiscrimination laws in place to protect religious diversity that is apparent in society today. There are two stages in considering the above statement; to consider the law protects freedom of religion and assessing its effectiveness. Blasphemy is an indictable common law offence, which has a spectrum of arguments for and against the retention of the law. It is a draconian law consisting of blasphemous libel and blasphemy, that latter of which took over from heresy. Lord Scarman defined blasphemous libel in a case in 1979 of Whitehouse v Lemon, where he stated that anything using scurrilous, abusive or offensive language would amount to blasphemous libel. ...read more.


This has been manifested through the Salman Rushdie Case where it was held that Muslims could not bring a case because their religion was not Christian. This case has been the focal point of the ongoing debate as to whether the law should be extended to include other religions. However it has been argued that it would impossible to extend the law because it cannot be defined as noted by the Law Commission. Moreover, the debate queries whether other sacred institutions should be included, which included Manchester United Football club as a possibility. In essence, the fact that only Christianity is protected doubtlessly proves to be a limitation to the protection of religion. We should also consider that Lord Denning stated blasphemy was a 'dead letter.' Yet the law was used some twenty years in Whitehouse v Lemon. In this case it seems that the state system was not interested in this blasphemous libel case, and it took Mary Whitehouse to bring a private prosecution, therefore this shows that prosecutions are a rarity, which in turn doesn't allow the law the opportunity to be effective in providing protection. ...read more.


It is as the Law Commission stated, it is virtually impossible to extend the law due to the lack of a definition for religion. Secondly, Genuine Occupational Requirements (GOR) will allow for interferences, for example if a faith based care home can show it can only employ people who practice this faith, it is a GOR. In its defence, these will be subject to tight controls and very limited circumstances and GOR's can only be deemed so by an employment tribunal. Finally, this regulation is only available within the workplace, which is perhaps its biggest flaw. It will not protect anyone who is subject to discrimination, harassment or victimisation on the street. But given these issues, it is undeniable that the regulation is a step in the correct direction to ensure the fullest protection for religion. In response to the question, the extent to which the principle is recognised is to an extent limited, as there are many flaws and limitations in the protection of freedom of religion. However, the EER 2003 is possibly signalling a change in the level of which protection is given to various religions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Identify ONE Human Rights issue and assess the effectiveness of both international and domestic ...

    Similarly, nearly half of the 400,000 estimated sex workers in Indonesia are children under 18 years old."2 In addition, the media file, "Human trafficking ring busted 17 August, 2006," supports the fact that is a protocol isn't ratified, it is ultimately of no use.

  2. What is an indictable offence and how is it brought to trial?

    can make or unmake any law on any subject whatever, without any legal restriction. This idea was generally accepted as reality a hundred years ago, or even fifty years ago, but there must now be some doubt as to its truth.

  1. It is a matter of record there is no such thing as a right ...

    However a century later, in Argyll v Argyll9 the court intervened again to grant an injunction to prevent the revelation of a legal marital confidence, thus demonstrating that personal information is covered. This case has very recently been developed in light of case of A v B & C (which will be discussed later).

  2. To what extent has the Human Rights Act 1998 strengthened the rule of law ...

    of the ECHR, which is mirrored by Section 11 of the HRA. This was in spite of a 'Derogation Order' created by the Government, based upon Section 15 of the ECHR, loosely reflected in Section 14 of the HRA.20 It was intended that the Government would be able to justify

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    Furthermore, since certification constitutes acceptance of an instrument under the Uniform Commercial Code, a bank can never revoke certification against an HDC regardless of whether the HDC has changed position in reliance on the certification. Relevant Case SAM GOODY, INC.

  2. Critically evaluate the changes which have been made since 1990 to the definition of ...

    include the person who 'could not care less' about consent, that is a 'person who fails to take all the steps which are reasonable in the circumstances to find out if there is free agreement on the occasion in question.'28 Along side this proposals were made to determine whether the

  1. Tort Project 2003

    A had the intended malice to commit a tort against B but in tort law C cannot bring an action against A for battery. Although it is clear that criminal cases do not lay down rules or guidelines for civil law that should be adhered to yet in this instance it appears that in one eye of the law (ie)

  2. Do we have enough freedom?

    To avoid chaos or that is at least what we are made to believe. So by my definition any rules are removing ones freedom. Is that correct? So I came up with another definition of freedom. A person is free if they can do what they want within reason.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work