• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did prohibition change US society in the 1920s?

Extracts from this document...


Assignment 1: Objective 2 Question 2: How did prohibition change US society in the 1920s? After prohibition became the 18th amendment to the constitution in 1919 and prohibition became a nation wide law, it is a true fact that alcohol consumption and drunkenness declined sharply. In addition, medical statistics recorded a drop in the number of treatments for diseases associated with alcoholic psychoses. However, the negative impact of the law was so large, disaster in the US society was created by the deadly law of prohibition. Drinking became secretive and more expensive as it was against the law to sell, make or transport alcoholic drinks, but alcohol consumption didn't stop. 'Bootleggers' brought illegal liquor supplies to the cities and was sold at basement bars locked behind doors called, 'speakeasies.' ...read more.


People viewed prohibition as an unrealistic and unworkable law thus there was the lack of public support. This was because there were many loopholes in the law itself. For example, doctors could sell alcohol for medical uses, rabbis could use alcohol for their religion and the consumption of alcohol; the law didn't really outlaw this thus many people were open to breaking the law. People were ignoring the law, in fact they were breaking the law and didn't seem to care whether they became disreputable or not. Therefore, the respect for the law was low and prohibition was not very successful especially in north eastern cities. The illegal liquor business led to a rapid increase in organised crime and gangsters. ...read more.


Also, the fact the Capone's men were dressed as policemen made the crime seem even more wicked. Producing, selling and transporting alcohol was banned nevertheless there was still a high and rising demand for alcoholic drinks. Suppliers saw the profits in this business and liquor production rose by 400%. However, breweries and saloons were shut down so there was a rapid increase in speakeasies. More people were breaking the law thus more people were criminals and there was an increase in crime. Also, the strictness of alcohol related crime were harsher thus police and other authorities had more people to arrest. On the whole, although prohibition reduced the alcohol consumption; from 7.1 gallons per capita to even less than a gallon in 1934, and thus also reduced drunkenness, it led to disastrous results in the US society in the 1920s and 1930s. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    The defence of provocation which has similarities results in conviction of a lesser offence. Intoxication is also available to murder but again results in guilty of a lesser offence of murder. Self defence should produce a conviction for a lesser offence 2.

  2. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    5(b), The Banking Regulation Act, 11949]. It may be emphasized that the primary function of a banking company consists of accepting of deposits for the purpose of lending or investing the same. If the purpose of accepting of deposits is not to lend or invest, e.g., where a trader accepts

  1. On 5th May, 1920, Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were arrested and interviewed about the ...

    During the trial the prosecution emphasized the men's radical political beliefs. Vanzetti and Sacco were also accused of unpatriotic behaviour by fleeing to Mexico during the First World War. The trial lasted seven weeks and on 14th July, 1921, both men were found guilty of first degree murder and sentenced to death.

  2. Hot Hollie vs Gangster Greg's Gang and the Pirated TAT.

    In this case Hollie was lost her entire fortune on this fashion line. The possibilities of this business venture were endless and there is no reason why Hollie would not sue Gangster Gregg and his gang for everything they are worth, and by reviewing the profiles of the gang members, that is quite a hefty sum.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work