• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do these sources confirm the view that the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act was cruel in its implementation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sam James 8097 Walton High School Mr Corrigan How far do these sources confirm the view that the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act was cruel in its implementation? Sources 1, 2 and 5 go furthest in confirming the view that the poor law amendment act was cruel in its implementation. Source 1 written by Frederick Engels, strongly supports this view by showing evidence of cruelty to children, in the second paragraph. It states how 'a boy of five years old was punished by being shut in a dead room, where he had to sleep upon the lids of the coffins.' This being a very demoralising punishment for a child. A further example is given by Engels where he talks of an investigation revealing a nurse treating 'sufferers' who 'were tied fast with cords passed over the covering and under the bedstead, to save the nurse the trouble of sitting up at night.' Again this shows extreme cruelty under the poor law. This can be backed up by my own knowledge that there were various scandals such as the Andover Workhouse Scandal 1845-6, which showed extreme cases of cruelty. ...read more.

Middle

The bread to be not less than 24 nor more than 48 hours old." This shows unnecessary cruelty as I would be possible for the bread to be eaten fresh. However contradicting this source 3 states 'Although the workhouse food be more ample in quantity and better quality than that of which the labourer's family partakes.' The evidence stated goes as far as to suggest the workhouse was poor and small in quantity, but not necessarily cruel as it was enough to survive. Source 2 also talks of oakum picking. Oakum picking was a common task in workhouses where workers would pick rope fibres from old tarred rope. This would lead to 'nails broken and fingers bleeding,' as stated on victorianengland.org. Nowadays this work could be seen as extremely brutal and cruel. However compared to some of the work and injuries obtained by the hard manual work that labourers did outside the workhouse, this type of work could be seen as mild in brutality. Maybe as source 6 suggest 'workhouses were depressing and life inside of them was monotonous.' ...read more.

Conclusion

Cruelty is also evident in the sources 2 and 4 where segregation is shown. It was not necessary for the workhouse to enforce segregation in order to function properly, so therefore could be seen as cruel as it is separating families. However this again I feel was to make the workhouse seem a less desirable place to work as intended, as if it were desirable more of the able bodied poor would opt to work in the workhouse than find their own work. This is also the case I feel in the type of work conducted such as oakum picking. There is evidence of unnecessary cruelty such as that which happened in the Andover workhouse and as highlighted in source 1. However these 'scandals' are few and far between and are more to do with cruelty committed by individuals, than that created by the poor law as a whole. So this can not be generalised. On the whole I feel the implementation of the cruel law was not intentionally cruel, however was enforced in such a way to encourage the able bodied poor to look for work themselves. Word Count: 1129 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    of Intention or Recklessness (Subjective) to do harm, whereas s18 is only Intention to commit GBH. Intention for s18 S18 is the most serious non-fatal offence which can be committed short of killing the victim and facing a subsequent murder charge.

  2. The aims and principles of the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act.

    (Winston Churchill, Liberalism and the Social Problems, 1909, p. 209). Many administrators were outraged at the idea of Central Government becoming involved in the Amendment Act because as far as they were concerned the old system was more than sufficient for the needs of the poor.

  1. What were the principles underlying the Poor Law Amendment Act and how far did ...

    It had impressed many foreigners with its success. Parishes looked after their own people and, while people still lived in hardship, they did not have to starve or sleep out in the cold, as food and shelter would be provided for them.

  2. The Poor Law was a system established since the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, ...

    Payment of allowances was thought to encourage reckless breeding and immorality and the inflated poor-rates were a grievance burden on agriculture, hindering investment and enterprises, crushing the small tenant or freeholder. Farmers no longer had to pay their labourers decent wages when they could get relief from the parish.

  1. Should Capital Punishment be enforced

    If this is properly conducted, it can be considered humane. This is carried out by breaking the neck, and the time taken for death varies depending on the free-fall distance. Intoxicating one with poisonous gas, or otherwise known as the lethal gas method is currently used in six states, including California and Arizona.

  2. Fifth Amendment

    The courts rejected their claim though. The courts stated that Twining and Cornell confirming or denying the validity of the statements was part of the "due process of law" in the fifth amendment and fourteenth amendment.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    holder before maturity that he has no fixed residence, and that he will call in a few days to see if the bill has been paid by the acceptor. 2. When the drawer has countermanded payment. This is so because he has made it impossible for the holder to obtain payment.

  2. Recognition of States and

    Charter or the respect paid to such matters as the rule of law, democratic principles and human rights. These are not criteria for recognition in international law however, but rather preconditions of a political nature that have been formulated with a view to the commencement of relations between states.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work