• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Is Law Affected By Morality And Justice?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Is Law Affected By Morality And Justice? Over the years, the legal personnel of the English Legal System have tried to separate law from morality and justice. This has proven to be quite a hard task considering the fact that even the House of Lords judges allow their morals to influence their decisions on certain cases. I think it is difficult to separate morality from law because most of the laws in Britain are an example of enacted morality, such as the law on manslaughter and murder, which echoes the commandment "Thou shalt not kill." Separating justice from law is just as hard. The dictionary definition of justice is 'the normative idea of the proper outcome to a case.' People seem to misinterpret this and understand it as the actual outcome of the case and so having been through the process of law and not getting the outcome they expected they say that justice was not done. Moral principles can prove to be justificatory, that is they provide reasons for actions rather than excuses; they are concerned with the rights of those other than the originator of the principle. ...read more.

Middle

Another judge working alongside Lord Templeman, known as Lord Slynn disagreed and argued that there was nothing in the law saying these men had done wrong. He argued that the judges should think of the law and not of their feelings towards this particular subject. And so there you have it; morals cause conflict between judges during cases. It is hard even for them to separate morals and law in certain cases. The main difference between law and morality is that morality changes according to people, slowly and only at the will of the people. It cannot be deliberately changed whereas law can and is deliberately changed by legislation. Another variation is that morality is voluntary; people do not have to comply with moral rules but they do have to meet the terms of law. If somebody does something considered morally wrong they will not be faced with official sanctions although they may feel guilty or ashamed. However if somebody does something wrong by the law they will be faced with legal proceedings. ...read more.

Conclusion

Why play with fire if you don't want to be burnt? Mr Revill knew exactly what he was letting himself in for, no sane person will let somebody walk in and take their possessions. Maybe he didn't expect to be shot at and maybe using a gun is kind of drastic but what other means of protection has an elderly man got against a 21 year old? Yes he could have a guard dog but dogs need caring for, maybe Mr Newberry felt he wouldn't be able to take the dog on walks or feed him properly. Maybe he could have phoned the police but the burglars may have taken off by then. All is possible. I don't think it was a very just decision to make Mr Newberry pay damages when clearly the trouble was brought to him. It is cases like these where law and justice come into conflict. I think it is important to understand the fact that both morality and justice are separate to law however all three concepts do overlap in the sense that a lot of laws are on the basis of morals and morals are each individuals idea of justice. Rajveer Khera - Law ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Law essays

  1. Criminal Law (Offences against the person) - revision notes

    This was a miss-direction and he appealed. Judge said that Watson would have seen the mans age and frailty and therefore the jury should know this fact to. R v Ball (1989) - Ball had a dispute with a neighbour and had a shotgun, he also carried around blanks and live rounds in his pockets.

  2. Property, Liberty, and the Law

    Texas Corp, Intirtool patent was found invalid due to the fact that the description they filed in their patent paperwork was not up to standards and did not cover every aspect of the pliers, and Intirtool still sold the tools to Texas Corp.

  1. The Law Relating to Negotiable Instruments

    notary at his leisure; and when the protest is drawn up it relates back to the date of noting. [Sec. 100] Protest for better security: Where the acceptor of a bill has become insolvent, or has suspended payment, or his credit has been publicly impeached, before the maturity of the

  2. Lay People

    These 12 people will then form a panel and will be taken to see a case. If any of the jury members know each other or any one in the case they have been assigned, then they must let the court know as soon as possible so the panel can be remade or assigned to another case.

  1. Critically discuss different possible meanings of justice and explore the relationship between law and ...

    Another interpretation put forward was "Corrective Justice". Aristotle believed that if someone or the state suffers, due to the actions of someone else, this argues that there needs to be some correction to make up for it. If the injured party is left as they are, this is not just.

  2. In the context of the theoretical proposition on the issue of law and morality, ...

    Dying seems not so much a legal matter as a personal even intimate experience affected by bodily conditions, human relationships and social and medical practise. 4Hence taking this into consideration pro euthanasia groups believe in the individual right to die as well as the individual right to live so they

  1. Effectiveness of the law in gaining justice for society.

    The results of this were that the penalty for aggravated sexual assault in company was increased to penal servitude for life. This was largely imposed due to pressure from a considerable majority of people within multiple communities. Another aspect of the law where growing frustration existed amongst the community was

  2. civil law, criminal law and habeas corpus

    and the requisite mental state with which the act is done (the mens rea, 'guilty mind'). For example, in murder the actus reus is the unlawful killing of a person, while the mens rea is 'malice aforethought' (the intention to kill or cause grievous injury).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work